Extreme original data yield extreme decline effects.

Clements et al. respond to Munday's claim that his "reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies". They contend that extreme data reported in early studies authored by Dixson and Munday indeed result in an "extreme" decline effe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLOS Biology
Main Authors: Jeff C Clements, Josefin Sundin, Timothy D Clark, Fredrik Jutfelt
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023
Subjects:
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ocean acidification
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001996
https://doaj.org/article/ea361d70f0e3413ba62a12d1ebb10060
Description
Summary:Clements et al. respond to Munday's claim that his "reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies". They contend that extreme data reported in early studies authored by Dixson and Munday indeed result in an "extreme" decline effect in this field, and conclude that the decline effect is primarily driven by papers by particular authors.

Similar Items