Three‐liquid‐phase salting‐out extraction of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)‐rich oils from Euphausia superba

Abstract The TLPSOES parameters were optimized by response surface methodology using Box–Behnken design, which were 16.5% w/w of ammonium citrate, 17.5% w/w of ethanol, and 46% w/w of n‐hexane at 70 min of stirring time. Under optimized conditions the extraction efficiency attained was 90.91 ± 0.97%...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Engineering in Life Sciences
Main Authors: Liaqat Zeb, Xin‐Nan Teng, Muhammad Shafiq, Shu‐Chang Wang, Zhi‐Long Xiu, Zhi‐Guo Su
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley-VCH 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202000098
https://doaj.org/article/e82068b0369443c9abdd0a73925e5fa9
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e82068b0369443c9abdd0a73925e5fa9
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e82068b0369443c9abdd0a73925e5fa9 2023-05-15T13:38:06+02:00 Three‐liquid‐phase salting‐out extraction of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)‐rich oils from Euphausia superba Liaqat Zeb Xin‐Nan Teng Muhammad Shafiq Shu‐Chang Wang Zhi‐Long Xiu Zhi‐Guo Su 2021-10-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202000098 https://doaj.org/article/e82068b0369443c9abdd0a73925e5fa9 EN eng Wiley-VCH https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202000098 https://doaj.org/toc/1618-0240 https://doaj.org/toc/1618-2863 1618-2863 1618-0240 doi:10.1002/elsc.202000098 https://doaj.org/article/e82068b0369443c9abdd0a73925e5fa9 Engineering in Life Sciences, Vol 21, Iss 10, Pp 666-682 (2021) Antarctic krill docosahexaenoic acid eicosapentaenoic acid extraction efficiency fluoride three‐liquid‐phase salting‐out extraction system Biotechnology TP248.13-248.65 article 2021 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202000098 2022-12-31T07:34:34Z Abstract The TLPSOES parameters were optimized by response surface methodology using Box–Behnken design, which were 16.5% w/w of ammonium citrate, 17.5% w/w of ethanol, and 46% w/w of n‐hexane at 70 min of stirring time. Under optimized conditions the extraction efficiency attained was 90.91 ± 0.97% of EPA, 90.02 ± 1.04% of DHA, and 91.85 ± 1.11% of KO in the top n‐hexane phase. The highest extraction efficiency of proteins and flavonoids, i.e. 88.34 ± 1.35% and 79.67 ± 1.13%, was recorded in the solid interface and ethanol phase, respectively. The KO extracted by TLPSOES system consisted of lowest fluoride level compared to the conventional method and whole wet krill biomass. The TLPSOES is a potential candidate for nutraceutical industry of KO extraction from wet krill biomass. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Krill Euphausia superba Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Antarctic Engineering in Life Sciences 21 10 666 682
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Antarctic krill
docosahexaenoic acid
eicosapentaenoic acid
extraction efficiency
fluoride
three‐liquid‐phase salting‐out extraction system
Biotechnology
TP248.13-248.65
spellingShingle Antarctic krill
docosahexaenoic acid
eicosapentaenoic acid
extraction efficiency
fluoride
three‐liquid‐phase salting‐out extraction system
Biotechnology
TP248.13-248.65
Liaqat Zeb
Xin‐Nan Teng
Muhammad Shafiq
Shu‐Chang Wang
Zhi‐Long Xiu
Zhi‐Guo Su
Three‐liquid‐phase salting‐out extraction of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)‐rich oils from Euphausia superba
topic_facet Antarctic krill
docosahexaenoic acid
eicosapentaenoic acid
extraction efficiency
fluoride
three‐liquid‐phase salting‐out extraction system
Biotechnology
TP248.13-248.65
description Abstract The TLPSOES parameters were optimized by response surface methodology using Box–Behnken design, which were 16.5% w/w of ammonium citrate, 17.5% w/w of ethanol, and 46% w/w of n‐hexane at 70 min of stirring time. Under optimized conditions the extraction efficiency attained was 90.91 ± 0.97% of EPA, 90.02 ± 1.04% of DHA, and 91.85 ± 1.11% of KO in the top n‐hexane phase. The highest extraction efficiency of proteins and flavonoids, i.e. 88.34 ± 1.35% and 79.67 ± 1.13%, was recorded in the solid interface and ethanol phase, respectively. The KO extracted by TLPSOES system consisted of lowest fluoride level compared to the conventional method and whole wet krill biomass. The TLPSOES is a potential candidate for nutraceutical industry of KO extraction from wet krill biomass.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Liaqat Zeb
Xin‐Nan Teng
Muhammad Shafiq
Shu‐Chang Wang
Zhi‐Long Xiu
Zhi‐Guo Su
author_facet Liaqat Zeb
Xin‐Nan Teng
Muhammad Shafiq
Shu‐Chang Wang
Zhi‐Long Xiu
Zhi‐Guo Su
author_sort Liaqat Zeb
title Three‐liquid‐phase salting‐out extraction of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)‐rich oils from Euphausia superba
title_short Three‐liquid‐phase salting‐out extraction of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)‐rich oils from Euphausia superba
title_full Three‐liquid‐phase salting‐out extraction of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)‐rich oils from Euphausia superba
title_fullStr Three‐liquid‐phase salting‐out extraction of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)‐rich oils from Euphausia superba
title_full_unstemmed Three‐liquid‐phase salting‐out extraction of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)‐rich oils from Euphausia superba
title_sort three‐liquid‐phase salting‐out extraction of eicosapentaenoic acid (epa) and docosahexaenoic acid (dha)‐rich oils from euphausia superba
publisher Wiley-VCH
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202000098
https://doaj.org/article/e82068b0369443c9abdd0a73925e5fa9
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Krill
Euphausia superba
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Krill
Euphausia superba
op_source Engineering in Life Sciences, Vol 21, Iss 10, Pp 666-682 (2021)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202000098
https://doaj.org/toc/1618-0240
https://doaj.org/toc/1618-2863
1618-2863
1618-0240
doi:10.1002/elsc.202000098
https://doaj.org/article/e82068b0369443c9abdd0a73925e5fa9
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202000098
container_title Engineering in Life Sciences
container_volume 21
container_issue 10
container_start_page 666
op_container_end_page 682
_version_ 1766101476497686528