Baltic and Finnic linguistic relations reflected in geolinguistic studies of the Baltic languages

The article provides insight into the reflection of Baltic and Finnic language contacts in geolinguistic studies of the Baltic languages. These contacts have a rather long history, and are particularly intense between the Latvian language and Finnic languages (especially Livonian and Estonian). In L...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics
Main Author: Anna Stafecka
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Estonian
Published: University of Tartu Press 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2014.5.2.06
https://doaj.org/article/e09627c1567441c798276dc096cb8708
_version_ 1821736907083612160
author Anna Stafecka
author_facet Anna Stafecka
author_sort Anna Stafecka
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
container_issue 2
container_start_page 117
container_title Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics
container_volume 5
description The article provides insight into the reflection of Baltic and Finnic language contacts in geolinguistic studies of the Baltic languages. These contacts have a rather long history, and are particularly intense between the Latvian language and Finnic languages (especially Livonian and Estonian). In Lithuanian, Finnic borrowings have mostly appeared through Latvian, and fall into the dialectal Lithuanian vocabulary. The analysed material makes it possible to distinguish several areas of Finnic influences in Latvian sub-dialects. They are as follows: 1) the territory of the Livonian dialect which originated from Latvian-Livonian contact; 2) the sub-dialects along the Estonian border; 3) the sub-dialects around Gulbene and Alūksne; 4) the territory of the krieviņi (descendants of people who spoke Votic) in the Zemgale region; and 5) the sub-dialects in the Latgale region around Ludza. Geolinguistic research on language contacts may be helpful in solving certain problems of ethnic history. Kokkuvõte. Anna Stafecka: Balti ja läänemeresoome keelesuhete kajastus balti keelte geolingvistilistes uurimustes. Artikkel esitab ülevaate balti ja läänemeresoome keelesuhete kajastamisest balti keelte geolingvistilistes uurimustes. Neil kontaktidel on küllaltki pikk ajalugu ja need on eriti tugevad läti ja läänemeresoome keelte (eriti liivi ja eesti keele) vahel. Leedu keelde on läänemeresoome laenud saadud peamiselt läti keele vahendusel ja need kuuluvad leedu murdesõnavarasse. Analüüsitud materjal võimaldab eristada Läti murrakutes mitut läänemeresoome mõjupiirkonda: 1) läti-liivi kontaktide mõjul kujunenud liivipärase murde ala; 2) Eesti piiri äärsed murrakud; 3) Gulbene ja Alūksne ümbruse murrakud; 4) kreevinite (vadja keele kõnelejate järglaste) ala Zemgales ja 5) Ludza ümbruse murrakud Latgales. Keelekontaktide geolingvistiline uurimine võib kaasa aidata etnilise ajaloo küsimuste lahendamisele. Märksõnad: dialektoloogia, geolingvistika, balti-läänemeresoome keelekontaktid, murdeatlased
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre votic
genre_facet votic
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e09627c1567441c798276dc096cb8708
institution Open Polar
language English
Estonian
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
op_container_end_page 137
op_doi https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2014.5.2.06
op_relation https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/15130
https://doaj.org/toc/1736-8987
https://doaj.org/toc/2228-1339
doi:10.12697/jeful.2014.5.2.06
1736-8987
2228-1339
https://doaj.org/article/e09627c1567441c798276dc096cb8708
op_source Eesti ja Soome-ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri, Vol 5, Iss 2 (2014)
publishDate 2014
publisher University of Tartu Press
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e09627c1567441c798276dc096cb8708 2025-01-17T01:16:12+00:00 Baltic and Finnic linguistic relations reflected in geolinguistic studies of the Baltic languages Anna Stafecka 2014-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2014.5.2.06 https://doaj.org/article/e09627c1567441c798276dc096cb8708 EN ET eng est University of Tartu Press https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/jeful/article/view/15130 https://doaj.org/toc/1736-8987 https://doaj.org/toc/2228-1339 doi:10.12697/jeful.2014.5.2.06 1736-8987 2228-1339 https://doaj.org/article/e09627c1567441c798276dc096cb8708 Eesti ja Soome-ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri, Vol 5, Iss 2 (2014) dialectology geolinguistics Baltic-Finnic language contacts dialectal atlases Philology. Linguistics P1-1091 Finnic. Baltic-Finnic PH91-98.5 article 2014 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2014.5.2.06 2022-12-31T07:13:24Z The article provides insight into the reflection of Baltic and Finnic language contacts in geolinguistic studies of the Baltic languages. These contacts have a rather long history, and are particularly intense between the Latvian language and Finnic languages (especially Livonian and Estonian). In Lithuanian, Finnic borrowings have mostly appeared through Latvian, and fall into the dialectal Lithuanian vocabulary. The analysed material makes it possible to distinguish several areas of Finnic influences in Latvian sub-dialects. They are as follows: 1) the territory of the Livonian dialect which originated from Latvian-Livonian contact; 2) the sub-dialects along the Estonian border; 3) the sub-dialects around Gulbene and Alūksne; 4) the territory of the krieviņi (descendants of people who spoke Votic) in the Zemgale region; and 5) the sub-dialects in the Latgale region around Ludza. Geolinguistic research on language contacts may be helpful in solving certain problems of ethnic history. Kokkuvõte. Anna Stafecka: Balti ja läänemeresoome keelesuhete kajastus balti keelte geolingvistilistes uurimustes. Artikkel esitab ülevaate balti ja läänemeresoome keelesuhete kajastamisest balti keelte geolingvistilistes uurimustes. Neil kontaktidel on küllaltki pikk ajalugu ja need on eriti tugevad läti ja läänemeresoome keelte (eriti liivi ja eesti keele) vahel. Leedu keelde on läänemeresoome laenud saadud peamiselt läti keele vahendusel ja need kuuluvad leedu murdesõnavarasse. Analüüsitud materjal võimaldab eristada Läti murrakutes mitut läänemeresoome mõjupiirkonda: 1) läti-liivi kontaktide mõjul kujunenud liivipärase murde ala; 2) Eesti piiri äärsed murrakud; 3) Gulbene ja Alūksne ümbruse murrakud; 4) kreevinite (vadja keele kõnelejate järglaste) ala Zemgales ja 5) Ludza ümbruse murrakud Latgales. Keelekontaktide geolingvistiline uurimine võib kaasa aidata etnilise ajaloo küsimuste lahendamisele. Märksõnad: dialektoloogia, geolingvistika, balti-läänemeresoome keelekontaktid, murdeatlased Article in Journal/Newspaper votic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 5 2 117 137
spellingShingle dialectology
geolinguistics
Baltic-Finnic language contacts
dialectal atlases
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Finnic. Baltic-Finnic
PH91-98.5
Anna Stafecka
Baltic and Finnic linguistic relations reflected in geolinguistic studies of the Baltic languages
title Baltic and Finnic linguistic relations reflected in geolinguistic studies of the Baltic languages
title_full Baltic and Finnic linguistic relations reflected in geolinguistic studies of the Baltic languages
title_fullStr Baltic and Finnic linguistic relations reflected in geolinguistic studies of the Baltic languages
title_full_unstemmed Baltic and Finnic linguistic relations reflected in geolinguistic studies of the Baltic languages
title_short Baltic and Finnic linguistic relations reflected in geolinguistic studies of the Baltic languages
title_sort baltic and finnic linguistic relations reflected in geolinguistic studies of the baltic languages
topic dialectology
geolinguistics
Baltic-Finnic language contacts
dialectal atlases
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Finnic. Baltic-Finnic
PH91-98.5
topic_facet dialectology
geolinguistics
Baltic-Finnic language contacts
dialectal atlases
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Finnic. Baltic-Finnic
PH91-98.5
url https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2014.5.2.06
https://doaj.org/article/e09627c1567441c798276dc096cb8708