Deep Learning of Systematic Sea Ice Model Errors From Data Assimilation Increments
Abstract Data assimilation is often viewed as a framework for correcting short‐term error growth in dynamical climate model forecasts. When viewed on the time scales of climate however, these short‐term corrections, or analysis increments, can closely mirror the systematic bias patterns of the dynam...
Published in: | Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2023MS003757 https://doaj.org/article/dda1c37463534851b139ebf9aba0159e |
Summary: | Abstract Data assimilation is often viewed as a framework for correcting short‐term error growth in dynamical climate model forecasts. When viewed on the time scales of climate however, these short‐term corrections, or analysis increments, can closely mirror the systematic bias patterns of the dynamical model. In this study, we use convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to learn a mapping from model state variables to analysis increments, in order to showcase the feasibility of a data‐driven model parameterization which can predict state‐dependent model errors. We undertake this problem using an ice‐ocean data assimilation system within the Seamless system for Prediction and EArth system Research (SPEAR) model, developed at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, which assimilates satellite observations of sea ice concentration every 5 days between 1982 and 2017. The CNN then takes inputs of data assimilation forecast states and tendencies, and makes predictions of the corresponding sea ice concentration increments. Specifically, the inputs are states and tendencies of sea ice concentration, sea‐surface temperature, ice velocities, ice thickness, net shortwave radiation, ice‐surface skin temperature, sea‐surface salinity, as well as a land‐sea mask. We find the CNN is able to make skillful predictions of the increments in both the Arctic and Antarctic and across all seasons, with skill that consistently exceeds that of a climatological increment prediction. This suggests that the CNN could be used to reduce sea ice biases in free‐running SPEAR simulations, either as a sea ice parameterization or an online bias correction tool for numerical sea ice forecasts. |
---|