Traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine evidence map: a methodology to an overflowing field of data and noise
Every day there is criticism about lack of evidence on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM). But is this narrative evidence-based? Are we really missing research about TCIM? Or are we just not looking correctly at the evidence? Evidence maps are a useful method with the dual f...
Published in: | Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English Spanish Portuguese |
Published: |
Pan American Health Organization
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2021.48 https://doaj.org/article/d7f4a51d40a44302b100b9756f1f5bc1 |
Summary: | Every day there is criticism about lack of evidence on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM). But is this narrative evidence-based? Are we really missing research about TCIM? Or are we just not looking correctly at the evidence? Evidence maps are a useful method with the dual function of synthesizing available evidence on a specific topic and identifying knowledge gaps. This article presents a six-step evidence map methodology along with recently published TCIM evidence maps, including one related to COVID-19. TCIM evidence maps are useful instruments to inform decision-making for policymakers, health practitioners, and patients. |
---|