Can seasonal prediction models capture the Arctic mid‐latitude teleconnection on monthly time scales?

• Published in: Atmospheric Science Letters
• Main Authors: Gaeun Kim, Woo‐Seop Lee, Baek‐Min Kim
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2024
• Subjects: Arctic warming; Arctic‐midlatitude teleconnection; seasonal prediction; seasonal Prediction models; warm Arctic Cold Eurasia; Meteorology. Climatology; QC851-999; Arctic; Kara Sea
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1235; https://doaj.org/article/d4f7384d09444b73bb25304e8b2f08a8

Abstract This study explores Arctic warming's effect on Eurasia's temperature variability, notably the warm Arctic–cold Eurasia (WACE) pattern, and assesses seasonal prediction models' accuracy in capturing this phenomenon and its monthly variation. Arctic warming events are categorized into deep Arctic warming (DAW), shallow Arctic warming (SAW), warming aloft (WA), and no Arctic warming (NOAW), based on the temperatures at 2 m and 500 hPa in the Barents–Kara Sea. It is revealed that DAW events are significantly correlated with monthly cold temperature anomalies in East Asia, predominantly occurring in January–February, excluding December. This study evaluates two primary capabilities of seasonal prediction models: their proficiency in forecasting these Arctic warming events, particularly DAW, and their ability to replicate the spatial patterns associated with DAW. Some models demonstrated notable predictive skill for DAW events, with enhanced performance in January and February. Regarding spatial pattern reproduction, models showed limited alignment with the reference dataset over the Northern Hemisphere (above 25° N) in December, whereas a higher degree of concordance was observed in January–February. This indicates their capability in capturing the atmospheric circulation patterns associated with DAW, pointing to areas where model performance can be enhanced.