Tripartite periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System from a systemic perspective

In 1959, twelve countries with a strong record of interest in Antarctica signed a Treaty allowing accessibility to all signatories wishing to conduct peaceful scientific research. The Antarctic Treaty established science and international cooperation as its cornerstones but raised controversies beca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Relaciones Internacionales
Main Author: Mônica Heinzelmann Portella de Aguiar
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Nacional de La Plata 2019
Subjects:
J
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.24215/23142766e054
https://doaj.org/article/cba5300f13364bcd8c97c9fafcc373ed
Description
Summary:In 1959, twelve countries with a strong record of interest in Antarctica signed a Treaty allowing accessibility to all signatories wishing to conduct peaceful scientific research. The Antarctic Treaty established science and international cooperation as its cornerstones but raised controversies because of its hosting of sovereignty claims over Antarctic territory. This research aims to fill a gap in literature proposing a strict periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System under a systemic perspective. The paper also examines Brazil's accession into the Treaty. Using as indicators of legitimacy the increase in membership and the transparency of decision-making processes, the author argues that the Antarctic Treaty System has become recognized as a legitimate international regime.