Tripartite periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System from a systemic perspective
In 1959, twelve countries with a strong record of interest in Antarctica signed a Treaty allowing accessibility to all signatories wishing to conduct peaceful scientific research. The Antarctic Treaty established science and international cooperation as its cornerstones but raised controversies beca...
Published in: | Relaciones Internacionales |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.24215/23142766e054 https://doaj.org/article/cba5300f13364bcd8c97c9fafcc373ed |
Summary: | In 1959, twelve countries with a strong record of interest in Antarctica signed a Treaty allowing accessibility to all signatories wishing to conduct peaceful scientific research. The Antarctic Treaty established science and international cooperation as its cornerstones but raised controversies because of its hosting of sovereignty claims over Antarctic territory. This research aims to fill a gap in literature proposing a strict periodization of the Antarctic Treaty System under a systemic perspective. The paper also examines Brazil's accession into the Treaty. Using as indicators of legitimacy the increase in membership and the transparency of decision-making processes, the author argues that the Antarctic Treaty System has become recognized as a legitimate international regime. |
---|