Palaeo-sea-level and palaeo-ice-sheet databases: problems, strategies, and perspectives

Sea-level and ice-sheet databases have driven numerous advances in understanding the Earth system. We describe the challenges and offer best strategies that can be adopted to build self-consistent and standardised databases of geological and geochemical information used to archive palaeo-sea-levels...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climate of the Past
Main Authors: A. Düsterhus, A. Rovere, A. E. Carlson, B. P. Horton, V. Klemann, L. Tarasov, N. L. M. Barlow, T. Bradwell, J. Clark, A. Dutton, W. R. Gehrels, F. D. Hibbert, M. P. Hijma, N. Khan, R. E. Kopp, D. Sivan, T. E. Törnqvist
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-911-2016
https://doaj.org/article/c2c07cee44f643a9816a01c45c8175e4
Description
Summary:Sea-level and ice-sheet databases have driven numerous advances in understanding the Earth system. We describe the challenges and offer best strategies that can be adopted to build self-consistent and standardised databases of geological and geochemical information used to archive palaeo-sea-levels and palaeo-ice-sheets. There are three phases in the development of a database: (i) measurement, (ii) interpretation, and (iii) database creation. Measurement should include the objective description of the position and age of a sample, description of associated geological features, and quantification of uncertainties. Interpretation of the sample may have a subjective component, but it should always include uncertainties and alternative or contrasting interpretations, with any exclusion of existing interpretations requiring a full justification. During the creation of a database, an approach based on accessibility, transparency, trust, availability, continuity, completeness, and communication of content (ATTAC 3 ) must be adopted. It is essential to consider the community that creates and benefits from a database. We conclude that funding agencies should not only consider the creation of original data in specific research-question-oriented projects, but also include the possibility of using part of the funding for IT-related and database creation tasks, which are essential to guarantee accessibility and maintenance of the collected data.