I Saw a Light and Came Here / Children’s Experiences of Reincarnation by Erlendur Haraldsson and James G. Matlock

Part 1 of the book comprises the first 166 pages, having been contributed by Erlendur Haraldsson (professor of psychology emeritus at the University of Iceland) (Haraldsson 2017). The remaining 106 pages, Part 2, are from anthropologist James G. Matlock (Parapsychology Foundation, USA). Erlendur Har...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dieter Hassler
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: SSE 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/b70c3aff675349c4b0cd27d5d233c817
Description
Summary:Part 1 of the book comprises the first 166 pages, having been contributed by Erlendur Haraldsson (professor of psychology emeritus at the University of Iceland) (Haraldsson 2017). The remaining 106 pages, Part 2, are from anthropologist James G. Matlock (Parapsychology Foundation, USA). Erlendur Haraldsson may be seen as the doyen of European survival and especially reincarnation research. Among many of his books, he has now, at last, come out with one bringing together, as part of his outstanding lifetime accomplishments, his many relevant articles between two book covers (see references on p. 275) (Haraldsson 2017a). He belongs to the pioneers who around the world investigated cases of children spontaneously claiming to remember a previous life. Part 1 is written in the manner of an empirical field researcher. He lets his cases speak for themselves. Especially the first three examples, but also others farther down, will pose a problem to skeptics to come up with an explanation devoid of reincarnation. The first case is about the Sri Lancan girl Purnima Ekanayake (p. 3). She made 20 statements about her previous life, 14 of which were correct, 3 could not be tested, and 3 were false. Large birthmarks corresponded to the mode of death in her previous life. Before verification, the previous and the current family were not acquainted with each other; they lived far apart. The Lebanese boy Nazih in the second example (p. 13) uttered 17 verifiable statements about his previous life, all of which could be shown to be correct. He was asked 15 questions about very private family matters. He could answer them all to the satisfaction of the researcher. The small boy of only 4 years of age recognized a number of members of the previous family whom he could not have known normally. His case is one of the best documented because there were 9 informants who could contribute information about Nazih before contact was made with the previous family. For verification, 4 persons were available. Example number 3 deals with Duminda ...