Differences Between the CMIP5 and CMIP6 Antarctic Sea Ice Concentration Budgets

Abstract Compared to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) climate models, the Antarctic sea ice area (SIA) has been improved in Phase 6 (CMIP6). However, the lack of knowledge about the reliability of sea ice dynamic and thermodynamic processes in the CMIP6 models still limits t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Yafei Nie, Xia Lin, Qinghua Yang, Jiping Liu, Dake Chen, Petteri Uotila
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
Antarctic
sea ice
budgets
CMIP6
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
The Antarctic
Antarc*
Sea ice
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105265
https://doaj.org/article/b3f73a3d03334d5fb581edc035279a66
Description
Summary:Abstract Compared to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) climate models, the Antarctic sea ice area (SIA) has been improved in Phase 6 (CMIP6). However, the lack of knowledge about the reliability of sea ice dynamic and thermodynamic processes in the CMIP6 models still limits the accuracy of Antarctic sea ice projections. Here, by using a novel and systematic statistical metric, the performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models with near‐realistic SIAs was assessed. We found improvements in CMIP6 models relative to CMIP5. Moreover, forcing the sea ice‐ocean model with atmospheric reanalysis led to excessive ice convergence compared to the fully coupled ocean‐sea ice‐atmosphere model, although the SIA bias could be much smaller. This prevalent insufficient ice divergence in the models is highly correlated with the negative ice thickness bias, highlighting the importance of ice thickness in the correct simulation of sea ice dynamics.

Similar Items