Hydrography, transport and mixing of the West Spitsbergen Current: the Svalbard Branch in summer 2015

Measurements of ocean currents, stratification and microstructure were made in August 2015, northwest of Svalbard, downstream of the Atlantic inflow in Fram Strait in the Arctic Ocean. Observations in three sections are used to characterize the evolution of the West Spitsbergen Current (WSC) along a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean Science
Main Authors: E. Kolås, I. Fer
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018
Subjects:
G
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-1603-2018
https://doaj.org/article/ac5e1f29ba5e4c53b206ee23720de065
Description
Summary:Measurements of ocean currents, stratification and microstructure were made in August 2015, northwest of Svalbard, downstream of the Atlantic inflow in Fram Strait in the Arctic Ocean. Observations in three sections are used to characterize the evolution of the West Spitsbergen Current (WSC) along a 170 km downstream distance. Two alternative calculations imply 1.5 to 2 Sv (1 Sv = 10 6 m 3 s −1 ) is routed to recirculation and Yermak branch in Fram Strait, whereas 0.6 to 1.3 Sv is carried by the Svalbard branch. The WSC cools at a rate of 0.20 ∘ C per 100 km, with associated bulk heat loss per along-path meter of <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mn><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mn><mo>)</mo><mo>×</mo><msup><mn mathvariant="normal">10</mn><mn mathvariant="normal">7</mn></msup></mrow></math> <svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="79pt" height="15pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="22f92739fae766779ce14d58986af1e6"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="os-14-1603-2018-ie00001.svg" width="79pt" height="15pt" src="os-14-1603-2018-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg> W m −1 , corresponding to a surface heat loss of 380–550 W m −2 . The measured turbulent heat flux is too small to account for this cooling rate. Estimates using a plausible range of parameters suggest that the contribution of diffusion by eddies could be limited to one half of the observed heat loss. In addition to shear-driven mixing beneath the WSC core, we observe energetic convective mixing of an unstable bottom boundary layer on the slope, driven by Ekman advection of buoyant water across the slope. The estimated lateral buoyancy flux is O (10 −8 ) W kg −1 , sufficient to maintain a large fraction of the observed dissipation ...