Classification of Tundra Vegetation in the Krkonoše Mts. National Park Using APEX, AISA Dual and Sentinel-2A Data

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare suitability of aerial hyperspectral data (AISA Dual and APEX sensors) and Sentinel-2A data for classification of tundra vegetation cover in the Krkonoše Mts. National Park. We compared classification results (accuracy, maps) of pixel-based (Maximum L...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Journal of Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Lucie Kupková, Lucie Červená, Renáta Suchá, Lucie Jakešová, Bogdan Zagajewski, Stanislav Březina, Jana Albrechtová
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1274573
https://doaj.org/article/9be87133fe9e4211b8b1c8410c7cc998
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9be87133fe9e4211b8b1c8410c7cc998
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:9be87133fe9e4211b8b1c8410c7cc998 2023-05-15T18:39:55+02:00 Classification of Tundra Vegetation in the Krkonoše Mts. National Park Using APEX, AISA Dual and Sentinel-2A Data Lucie Kupková Lucie Červená Renáta Suchá Lucie Jakešová Bogdan Zagajewski Stanislav Březina Jana Albrechtová 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1274573 https://doaj.org/article/9be87133fe9e4211b8b1c8410c7cc998 EN eng Taylor & Francis Group http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1274573 https://doaj.org/toc/2279-7254 2279-7254 doi:10.1080/22797254.2017.1274573 https://doaj.org/article/9be87133fe9e4211b8b1c8410c7cc998 European Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol 50, Iss 1, Pp 29-46 (2017) Tundra vegetation The Krkonoše Mountains Per-pixel classification Object-based classification Hyperspectral data Sentiel-2A Oceanography GC1-1581 Geology QE1-996.5 article 2017 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1274573 2022-12-31T09:31:02Z The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare suitability of aerial hyperspectral data (AISA Dual and APEX sensors) and Sentinel-2A data for classification of tundra vegetation cover in the Krkonoše Mts. National Park. We compared classification results (accuracy, maps) of pixel-based (Maximum Likelihood, Suport Vector Machine and Neural Net) and object-based approaches. The best classification results (overall accuracy 84.3%, Kappa coefficient = 0.81) were achieved for AISA Dual data using per-pixel SVM classifier for 40 PCA bands. The best classification results of APEX though were only 1.7 percentage points lower. To get comparable results for Sentinel-2A classification legend had to be simplified. With the simplified legend the accuracy using MLC classifier reached 77.7%. Article in Journal/Newspaper Tundra Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles European Journal of Remote Sensing 50 1 29 46
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Tundra vegetation
The Krkonoše Mountains
Per-pixel classification
Object-based classification
Hyperspectral data
Sentiel-2A
Oceanography
GC1-1581
Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle Tundra vegetation
The Krkonoše Mountains
Per-pixel classification
Object-based classification
Hyperspectral data
Sentiel-2A
Oceanography
GC1-1581
Geology
QE1-996.5
Lucie Kupková
Lucie Červená
Renáta Suchá
Lucie Jakešová
Bogdan Zagajewski
Stanislav Březina
Jana Albrechtová
Classification of Tundra Vegetation in the Krkonoše Mts. National Park Using APEX, AISA Dual and Sentinel-2A Data
topic_facet Tundra vegetation
The Krkonoše Mountains
Per-pixel classification
Object-based classification
Hyperspectral data
Sentiel-2A
Oceanography
GC1-1581
Geology
QE1-996.5
description The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare suitability of aerial hyperspectral data (AISA Dual and APEX sensors) and Sentinel-2A data for classification of tundra vegetation cover in the Krkonoše Mts. National Park. We compared classification results (accuracy, maps) of pixel-based (Maximum Likelihood, Suport Vector Machine and Neural Net) and object-based approaches. The best classification results (overall accuracy 84.3%, Kappa coefficient = 0.81) were achieved for AISA Dual data using per-pixel SVM classifier for 40 PCA bands. The best classification results of APEX though were only 1.7 percentage points lower. To get comparable results for Sentinel-2A classification legend had to be simplified. With the simplified legend the accuracy using MLC classifier reached 77.7%.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lucie Kupková
Lucie Červená
Renáta Suchá
Lucie Jakešová
Bogdan Zagajewski
Stanislav Březina
Jana Albrechtová
author_facet Lucie Kupková
Lucie Červená
Renáta Suchá
Lucie Jakešová
Bogdan Zagajewski
Stanislav Březina
Jana Albrechtová
author_sort Lucie Kupková
title Classification of Tundra Vegetation in the Krkonoše Mts. National Park Using APEX, AISA Dual and Sentinel-2A Data
title_short Classification of Tundra Vegetation in the Krkonoše Mts. National Park Using APEX, AISA Dual and Sentinel-2A Data
title_full Classification of Tundra Vegetation in the Krkonoše Mts. National Park Using APEX, AISA Dual and Sentinel-2A Data
title_fullStr Classification of Tundra Vegetation in the Krkonoše Mts. National Park Using APEX, AISA Dual and Sentinel-2A Data
title_full_unstemmed Classification of Tundra Vegetation in the Krkonoše Mts. National Park Using APEX, AISA Dual and Sentinel-2A Data
title_sort classification of tundra vegetation in the krkonoše mts. national park using apex, aisa dual and sentinel-2a data
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1274573
https://doaj.org/article/9be87133fe9e4211b8b1c8410c7cc998
genre Tundra
genre_facet Tundra
op_source European Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol 50, Iss 1, Pp 29-46 (2017)
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1274573
https://doaj.org/toc/2279-7254
2279-7254
doi:10.1080/22797254.2017.1274573
https://doaj.org/article/9be87133fe9e4211b8b1c8410c7cc998
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1274573
container_title European Journal of Remote Sensing
container_volume 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 29
op_container_end_page 46
_version_ 1766228966351306752