Engage, understand, listen and act: evaluation of Community Panels to privilege First Nations voices in pandemic planning and response in Australia

Introduction First Nations Peoples of Australia have not been included in the development nor prioritised in pre-2009 pandemic plans despite being a priority population in Australian health policy. Marginalised groups experience amplified barriers and systemic disadvantage in emergencies, however, t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ Global Health
Main Authors: Adrian Miller, Sandra Campbell, Kristy Crooks, Kylie Taylor, Charlee Law
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009114
https://doaj.org/article/76973fc3aae64a1a8984911d82f18ef8
_version_ 1821511858798985216
author Adrian Miller
Sandra Campbell
Kristy Crooks
Kylie Taylor
Charlee Law
author_facet Adrian Miller
Sandra Campbell
Kristy Crooks
Kylie Taylor
Charlee Law
author_sort Adrian Miller
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
container_issue 8
container_start_page e009114
container_title BMJ Global Health
container_volume 7
description Introduction First Nations Peoples of Australia have not been included in the development nor prioritised in pre-2009 pandemic plans despite being a priority population in Australian health policy. Marginalised groups experience amplified barriers and systemic disadvantage in emergencies, however, their voices have not been heard in past pandemic responses. Through effective engagement with disadvantaged and oppressed groups, health authorities can gain a deeper understanding of how to design and implement pandemic control strategies. There have been limited studies with First Nations Peoples that has focused on pandemic planning and response strategies. Deliberative inclusive approaches such as citizens juries have been a way to uncover public perceptions.Methods Qualitative thematic research methods were used to conduct the study. We convened five First Nations Community Panels in three locations in Australia between 2019 and 2020. We used an Indigenist research approach, community-based Participatory Action Research framework and ‘yarning’ to understand whether Community Panels were an acceptable and appropriate way of engaging First Nations Peoples. Forty First Nations participants were purposively recruited through local and cultural networks. Panels heard evidence supporting various pandemic response strategies, and cross-questioned public health experts.Results All 40 participants from the 5 panels verbally indicated strong support of the Community Panels approach as an effective way of engaging First Nations Peoples in making decisions about pandemic planning and response strategies. The main theme of ‘respect’ centred on the overarching principle that First Nations Peoples are important in the context of continuation of culture and ongoing political resistance.Conclusion First Nations Community Panels are a way of enabling active participation of First Nations peoples, increasing knowledge and understanding, and a way for government and policymakers to respectfully listen to First Nations opinions and ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:76973fc3aae64a1a8984911d82f18ef8
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009114
op_relation https://gh.bmj.com/content/7/8/e009114.full
https://doaj.org/toc/2059-7908
doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009114
2059-7908
https://doaj.org/article/76973fc3aae64a1a8984911d82f18ef8
op_source BMJ Global Health, Vol 7, Iss 8 (2022)
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:76973fc3aae64a1a8984911d82f18ef8 2025-01-16T21:53:03+00:00 Engage, understand, listen and act: evaluation of Community Panels to privilege First Nations voices in pandemic planning and response in Australia Adrian Miller Sandra Campbell Kristy Crooks Kylie Taylor Charlee Law 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009114 https://doaj.org/article/76973fc3aae64a1a8984911d82f18ef8 EN eng BMJ Publishing Group https://gh.bmj.com/content/7/8/e009114.full https://doaj.org/toc/2059-7908 doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009114 2059-7908 https://doaj.org/article/76973fc3aae64a1a8984911d82f18ef8 BMJ Global Health, Vol 7, Iss 8 (2022) Medicine (General) R5-920 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009114 2022-12-30T23:14:26Z Introduction First Nations Peoples of Australia have not been included in the development nor prioritised in pre-2009 pandemic plans despite being a priority population in Australian health policy. Marginalised groups experience amplified barriers and systemic disadvantage in emergencies, however, their voices have not been heard in past pandemic responses. Through effective engagement with disadvantaged and oppressed groups, health authorities can gain a deeper understanding of how to design and implement pandemic control strategies. There have been limited studies with First Nations Peoples that has focused on pandemic planning and response strategies. Deliberative inclusive approaches such as citizens juries have been a way to uncover public perceptions.Methods Qualitative thematic research methods were used to conduct the study. We convened five First Nations Community Panels in three locations in Australia between 2019 and 2020. We used an Indigenist research approach, community-based Participatory Action Research framework and ‘yarning’ to understand whether Community Panels were an acceptable and appropriate way of engaging First Nations Peoples. Forty First Nations participants were purposively recruited through local and cultural networks. Panels heard evidence supporting various pandemic response strategies, and cross-questioned public health experts.Results All 40 participants from the 5 panels verbally indicated strong support of the Community Panels approach as an effective way of engaging First Nations Peoples in making decisions about pandemic planning and response strategies. The main theme of ‘respect’ centred on the overarching principle that First Nations Peoples are important in the context of continuation of culture and ongoing political resistance.Conclusion First Nations Community Panels are a way of enabling active participation of First Nations peoples, increasing knowledge and understanding, and a way for government and policymakers to respectfully listen to First Nations opinions and ... Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles BMJ Global Health 7 8 e009114
spellingShingle Medicine (General)
R5-920
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Adrian Miller
Sandra Campbell
Kristy Crooks
Kylie Taylor
Charlee Law
Engage, understand, listen and act: evaluation of Community Panels to privilege First Nations voices in pandemic planning and response in Australia
title Engage, understand, listen and act: evaluation of Community Panels to privilege First Nations voices in pandemic planning and response in Australia
title_full Engage, understand, listen and act: evaluation of Community Panels to privilege First Nations voices in pandemic planning and response in Australia
title_fullStr Engage, understand, listen and act: evaluation of Community Panels to privilege First Nations voices in pandemic planning and response in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Engage, understand, listen and act: evaluation of Community Panels to privilege First Nations voices in pandemic planning and response in Australia
title_short Engage, understand, listen and act: evaluation of Community Panels to privilege First Nations voices in pandemic planning and response in Australia
title_sort engage, understand, listen and act: evaluation of community panels to privilege first nations voices in pandemic planning and response in australia
topic Medicine (General)
R5-920
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
topic_facet Medicine (General)
R5-920
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
url https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009114
https://doaj.org/article/76973fc3aae64a1a8984911d82f18ef8