Description of continuous data using bar graphs: a misleading approach

INTRODUCTION: With the ease provided by current computational programs, medical and scientific journals use bar graphs to describe continuous data. METHODS: This manuscript discusses the inadequacy of bars graphs to present continuous data. RESULTS: Simulated data show that box plots and dot plots a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
Main Author: Edson Zangiacomi Martinez
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) 2015
Subjects:
Biostatistics
Descriptive statistics
Medical research
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Arctic
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0013-2015
https://doaj.org/article/6a3020d521a945c8931abcb3fffd4dae
Description
Summary:INTRODUCTION: With the ease provided by current computational programs, medical and scientific journals use bar graphs to describe continuous data. METHODS: This manuscript discusses the inadequacy of bars graphs to present continuous data. RESULTS: Simulated data show that box plots and dot plots are more-feasible tools to describe continuous data. CONCLUSIONS: These plots are preferred to represent continuous variables since they effectively describe the range, shape, and variability of observations and clearly identify outliers. By contrast, bar graphs address only measures of central tendency. Bar graphs should be used only to describe qualitative data.

Similar Items