Quantitative polymerase chain reaction in paucibacillary leprosy diagnosis: A follow-up study.

• Published in: PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
• Main Authors: Raquel R Barbieri, Fernanda S N Manta, Suelen J M Moreira, Anna M Sales, José A C Nery, Lilian P R Nascimento, Mariana A Hacker, Antônio G Pacheco, Alice M Machado, Euzenir M Sarno, Milton O Moraes
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019
• Subjects: Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine; RC955-962; Public aspects of medicine; RA1-1270; Arctic
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007147; https://doaj.org/article/5e813dac0e5d496d921953c8e547bf10

OBJECTIVE:The diagnosis of paucibacillary (PB) leprosy cases remains a challenge because of the absence of a confirmatory laboratory method. While quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) has been shown to provide reliable sensitivity and specificity in PB diagnoses, a thorough investigation of its efficacy in clinical practice has not yet been published. The present study evaluated patients with suspected leprosy skin lesions by using qPCR to identify PB individuals in the Leprosy Outpatient clinic at the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. METHODS:One hundred seventy-two suspected PB cases were included in the study. The patients were evaluated by a dermatologist at three different times. The clinical dermato-neurological examination and collected samples were performed on the first visit. On the second visit, the results of the histopathological analysis and PCR assay (DNA-based Mycobacterium leprae qPCR-targeting 16S gene) results were analyzed, and a decision regarding multi-drug therapy was made. A year later, the patients were re-examined, and the consensus diagnosis was established. RESULTS:In 58% (100/172) of cases, a conclusive diagnosis via histopathological analysis was not possible; however, 30% (30/100) of these cases had a positive PCR. One hundred ten patients (110/172) attended the third visit. The analysis showed that while the sensitivity of the histopathological test was very low (35%), a qPCR alone was more effective for identifying leprosy, with 57% sensitivity. CONCLUSION:The use of qPCR in suspected PB cases with an inconclusive histology improved the sensitivity of leprosy diagnoses.