Sulfur isotope signatures of sulfides from the Khibina and Lovozero massifs (Kola Alkaline Province, Fennoscandian Shield)

• Published in: Vestnik MGTU
• Main Authors: Huber M, Mokrushin A. V.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: Russian
• Published: Murmansk State Technical University 2021
• Subjects: geochemistry; sulfur stable isotope; khibina; lovozero; kola alkaline province; arctic zone of rf; геохимия; стабильные изотопы серы; хибины; ловозеро; кольская щелочная провинция; арктическая зона рф; General Works; A; Arctic; Diablo; Kovdor; Lovozero; Fennoscandian
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.21443/1560-9278-2021-24-1-80-87; https://doaj.org/article/51d84080c07543b3a519484b09e1a4e6

The sulfur isotope geochemistry of the Khibina and Lovozero agpaitic massifs provides an opportunity to understand the role of plume-lithosphere interaction processes responsible for the Paleozoic alkaline igneous activity in the north-eastern part of the Fennoscandian Shield. The stable sulfur isotope δ34S analysis using triple collector isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS) has been carried out on the pentlandite, chalcopyrite and pyrite from nepheline syenites. The δ34S values for pentlandite from Khibina rocks range from +0.69 to +2.06 ‰ relative to the Vienna Canyon Diablo Troillite standard (VCDT), and the pyrite has significantly higher δ34S values up to +4.92 ‰ VCDT. The pentlandite from the Lovozero samples has value +1.48 ‰ VCDT, δ34S values of chalcopyrite is +2.85 ‰ VCDT. The maximum positive δ34S values are obtained for Lovozero pyrite, which vary from +5.41 to +6.30 ‰ VCDT. Comparison of sulfur-geochemical features of Khibina and Lovozero nepheline syenite with δ34S data for the carbonatites from the Khibina, Sallanlatvi, Seblyavr, Vuoriyarvi, Salmagora and Kovdor massifs show later carbonatite formation relatively to associated alkaline rocks. Geochemical sulfur isotope δ34S investigations emphasizes that parental magmas of the Khibina and Lovozero alkaline massifs were derived from a metasomatized subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM). We suggest that high-δ34S signature on the SCLM (δ34S of +1 to +6 ‰ VCDT) can be explained by subduction of the high-δ34S Archaean crust.