Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval Based on Fully Connected Neural Network (FCNN) and a Combine Algorithm of Simplified Aerosol Retrieval Algorithm and Simplified and Robust Surface Reflectance Estimation (SREMARA)

• Published in: IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
• Main Authors: Yulong Fan, Lin Sun
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: IEEE 2023
• Subjects: Aerosol optical depth (AOD); fully connected neural network (FCNN); simplified aerosol retrieval algorithm (SARA); simplified and robust surface reflectance estimation (SREM); Ocean engineering; TC1501-1800; Geophysics. Cosmic physics; QC801-809; Aerosol Robotic Network
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3281777; https://doaj.org/article/34a365ec978d4196bec81b5cfcc9cb6c

Aerosol satellite retrieval can provide detailed aerosol information on a large scale, which becomes one of the main ways of global aerosol research. However, rapid and accrue aerosol retrieval by satellite is challenging, typically requiring radiation transfer models (RTMs) and surface reflectance (SR). An aerosol retrieval algorithm (SEMARA) combining the simplified aerosol retrieval algorithm and simplified and robust surface reflectance estimation can obtain local high-precision aerosol optical depth (AOD) without RTMs and SR datasets, while the method cannot perform large-scale and long-term aerosol retrieval. Hereby, a machine learning (ML) method based on the fully connected neural network (FCNN) and SEMARA was proposed. The new method optimizes the traditional sample construction of the ML and can achieve aerosol retrieval at a larger spatial and temporal scale. Moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer data were applied to AOD retrieval on four typical regions globally. The AOD retrievals were validated using aerosol robotic network measurements in comparison to MOD04_3K AOD and the SEMARA. The accuracy validation indicators of the new method, in which the root-mean-square error (RMSE) was 0.109, mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.072, Pearson correlation coefficient (R) was 0.8983, and approximately 79.69% of the retrievals fell within the expected error (EE), performed better than MOD04_3K (RMSE = 0.1972 MAE = 0.1403, R = 0.7692 and Within EE = 55.24%) and the SEMARA method (RMSE = 0.2465 MAE = 0.1106, R = 0.0.5968 and Within EE = 72.85%) in all study regions, and the AOD retrievals can better reflect the spatial variation of AOD with better spatial continuity and coverage.