Validation of MIPAS-ENVISAT NO2 operational data

The Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) instrument was launched aboard the environmental satellite ENVISAT into its sun-synchronous orbit on 1 March 2002. The short-lived species NO 2 is one of the key target products of MIPAS that are operationally retrieved from limb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Ruhnke, J.-P. Pommereau, H. Oelhaf, G. Maucher, M. López-Puertas, D. Ionov, N. Huret, H. Fischer, M. De Mazière, C. Belotti, T. Blumenstock, A. Bazureau, C. Piccolo, M. Pirre, S. Mikuteit, J.-C. Lambert, F. Hendrick, F. Goutail, B. Funke, G. Wetzel, A. Bracher, M. Sinnhuber, G. Stiller, M. Van Roozendael, G. Zhang
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/2887433845df4a4b94939fe084af4cec
Description
Summary:The Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) instrument was launched aboard the environmental satellite ENVISAT into its sun-synchronous orbit on 1 March 2002. The short-lived species NO 2 is one of the key target products of MIPAS that are operationally retrieved from limb emission spectra measured in the stratosphere and mesosphere. Within the MIPAS validation activities, a large number of independent observations from balloons, satellites and ground-based stations have been compared to European Space Agency (ESA) version 4.61 operational NO 2 data comprising the time period from July 2002 until March 2004 where MIPAS measured with full spectral resolution. Comparisons between MIPAS and balloon-borne observations carried out in 2002 and 2003 in the Arctic, at mid-latitudes, and in the tropics show a very good agreement below 40 km altitude with a mean deviation of roughly 3%, virtually without any significant bias. The comparison to ACE satellite observations exhibits only a small negative bias of MIPAS which appears not to be significant. The independent satellite instruments HALOE, SAGE II, and POAM III confirm in common for the spring-summer time period a negative bias of MIPAS in the Arctic and a positive bias in the Antarctic middle and upper stratosphere exceeding frequently the combined systematic error limits. In contrast to the ESA operational processor, the IMK/IAA retrieval code allows accurate inference of NO 2 volume mixing ratios under consideration of all important non-LTE processes. Large differences between both retrieval results appear especially at higher altitudes, above about 50 to 55 km. These differences might be explained at least partly by non-LTE under polar winter conditions but not at mid-latitudes. Below this altitude region mean differences between both processors remain within 5% (during night) and up to 10% (during day) under undisturbed (September 2002) conditions and up to 40% under perturbed polar night conditions (February and March 2004). The ...