Variation in spawning phenology within salmon populations influences landscape‐level patterns of brown bear activity
Abstract Animal consumers track spatial variation in resource phenology (i.e., resource waves) to prolong their access to ephemeral foods. While recent work has revealed how animals move across landscapes to exploit phenological variation among discrete foraging patches, much less is known about how...
| Published in: | Ecosphere |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2575 https://doaj.org/article/0ef58d5c48764228ab439fb1441dcc5c |
| Summary: | Abstract Animal consumers track spatial variation in resource phenology (i.e., resource waves) to prolong their access to ephemeral foods. While recent work has revealed how animals move across landscapes to exploit phenological variation among discrete foraging patches, much less is known about how variation nested within patches influences the spatiotemporal pattern of foraging opportunities and the behavior of consumers. Local, within‐patch, variation in phenology influences levels of resource ephemerality and could dictate how frequently consumers must move to continuously exploit a pulsed food source. Here, we explore how within‐site (stream) phenological variation relates to the duration of salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) runs and its consequences for brown bear (Ursus arctos middendorffi) foraging behavior. We accurately quantified salmon run duration across a large number of spawning streams (21 site‐year combinations). We found that salmon run duration varied threefold among spawning sites and that the source of prolonged runs was within‐site variation in spawning phenology (i.e., the timing of arrival at spawning grounds). Although the estimated reproductive lifespan varied among sites, a simulation suggested that reproductive lifespan has little influence on salmon run duration. Salmon run duration strongly predicted the duration of site occupancy by bears, demonstrating that phenological variation within salmon populations compliments among‐population variation to alleviate time constraints on salmon consumption. To explore whether within‐population variation in salmon phenology was related to spatial variation in habitat conditions (as is the case with among‐population phenological variation), we monitored water temperature, salmon availability, and bear activity across a longitudinal gradient in Connecticut Creek, the study stream with the most prolonged salmon run. Spawn timing varied spatially, occurring first in cold headwater reaches and later in warmer downstream reaches. Patterns of bear presence ... |
|---|