A Comparison of Gravimetric, Isostatic, and Spectral Decomposition Methods for a Possible Enhancement of the Mantle Signature in the Long-Wavelength Geoidal Geometry
A long-wavelength geoidal geometry characterizes the most pronounced features of the Indian Ocean geoid low and the West Pacific and North Atlantic geoid highs. These large geoid undulations (globally roughly within ±100 m) are mainly attributed to a deep mantle structure and large lithospheric dens...
| Published in: | Remote Sensing |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15194845 https://doaj.org/article/0836bf886ca049aca79641db501d6e86 |
| Summary: | A long-wavelength geoidal geometry characterizes the most pronounced features of the Indian Ocean geoid low and the West Pacific and North Atlantic geoid highs. These large geoid undulations (globally roughly within ±100 m) are mainly attributed to a deep mantle structure and large lithospheric density and geometry variations (such as the African superswell), while maximum geoid modifications by a topographic relief of Himalaya and Tibet are up to ~30 m. To enhance the mantle signature in a long-wavelength geoidal geometry, gravimetric, isostatic, and spectral decomposition methods can be applied. In this study, we demonstrate that isostatic schemes yield isostatic geoid models that closely resemble a long-wavelength geoidal geometry. The gravimetric method, on the other hand, modifies the mantle geoid significantly. Further modifications of the mantle geoid by removing gravitational contributions of lithospheric mantle density and lithospheric thickness variations should (optimally) enhance the signature of the deep mantle in the sub-lithospheric mantle geoid. Our results confirm this assumption by revealing (large-scale) positive anomalies in the Central Pacific and along the Atlantic Ocean that are coupled by two negative anomalies in the East Pacific and South Eurasia. A gravimetric method thus better enhances the mantle signature in the geoidal geometry than isostatic and spatial decomposition methods. Nonetheless, our results also indicate the presence of possibly large errors in geoid modelling results that limit their full implementation in gravimetric studies of the Earth’s mantle density structure without using tomographic images of the mantle and additional geophysical, geothermal, and geochemical constraints. |
|---|