Offshore is Onshore: Scalability, Synchronization, and Speed of Decision in Arctic SAR

With its massive size, small population, and extreme climate, the Arctic is a highly relevant case for studying Search and Rescue (SAR) in remote and challenging environments. Climate change leads to increased shipping, tourism, and oil and gas exploration in the Arctic, creating new risks that need...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies
Main Authors: Rasmus Dahlberg, Morten Thanning Vendelø, Birgitte Refslund Sørensen, Kristian Cedervall Lauta
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Scandinavian Military Studies 2020
Subjects:
U
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.52
https://doaj.org/article/01fabae6e8e649c2b1fa3b4af6ecf006
Description
Summary:With its massive size, small population, and extreme climate, the Arctic is a highly relevant case for studying Search and Rescue (SAR) in remote and challenging environments. Climate change leads to increased shipping, tourism, and oil and gas exploration in the Arctic, creating new risks that need to be mitigated. The three major challenges to Arctic SAR are: (i) limited SAR capabilities, (ii) a multi-jurisdictional context with multiple Danish/Greenlandic and civilian/military authorities involved, and (iii) the need for coordination of a diverse set of organizational units operating both onshore and offshore. We use the case of a large-scale SAR exercise, LIVEX 2016, held off the west coast of Greenland, to explore these challenges from a three-tier analytical approach: 'Scalability', which investigates surge capacity in crisis management, 'Synchronization', which focuses on challenges related to the creation and maintenance of a situational picture during a SAR operation, and 'Speed of decision', which looks at how complex matters are managed in a multi-jurisdictional context under time pressure. Our findings show: (i) that surge capacity requires more focus on integration than activation, (ii), that actors must question information and challenge their own interpretations to maintain a synchronized situational awareness, and (iii) that urgency may result in a decrease of speed in decision-making.