Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements

Methane (CH4) fluxes emitted by wetlands at high latitudes remain one of the largest sources of uncertainties in global methane budgets. At these latitudes, flux estimation approaches, such as atmospheric inversions, are impacted by improper characterisation of atmospheric transport due to challengi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Langot, Félix, Crevoisier, Cyril, Lauvaux, Thomas, Abdallah, Charbel, Pernin, Jérôme, Xin, Lin, Saunois, Marielle, Guedj, Axel, Ponthieu, Thomas, Roiger, Anke-Elisabeth, Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk, Fiehn, Alina
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Copernicus Publications 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elib.dlr.de/209431/
https://editor.copernicus.org/EGUsphere/ms_records/egusphere-2024-3559
_version_ 1835017045425520640
author Langot, Félix
Crevoisier, Cyril
Lauvaux, Thomas
Abdallah, Charbel
Pernin, Jérôme
Xin, Lin
Saunois, Marielle
Guedj, Axel
Ponthieu, Thomas
Roiger, Anke-Elisabeth
Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk
Fiehn, Alina
author_facet Langot, Félix
Crevoisier, Cyril
Lauvaux, Thomas
Abdallah, Charbel
Pernin, Jérôme
Xin, Lin
Saunois, Marielle
Guedj, Axel
Ponthieu, Thomas
Roiger, Anke-Elisabeth
Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk
Fiehn, Alina
author_sort Langot, Félix
collection Unknown
description Methane (CH4) fluxes emitted by wetlands at high latitudes remain one of the largest sources of uncertainties in global methane budgets. At these latitudes, flux estimation approaches, such as atmospheric inversions, are impacted by improper characterisation of atmospheric transport due to challenging meteorological conditions and a lack of measurements. Here, we assess the performances of ERA5 reanalysis, mesoscale simulations from WRF-Chem, and various atmospheric transport models from several global and regional inversion systems using meteorological and CH4 in-situ measurements collected during the MAGIC2021 campaign near Kiruna, Sweden. Over six measurements days in August 2021, ERA5 exhibited better agreement with observations than WRF-Chem thanks to data assimilation. Nevertheless, WRF-Chem demonstrated proficiency in simulating local atmospheric dynamics. Among global simulations of atmospheric concentrations of CH4, inversion-optimised simulations of CH4 concentrations yielded the best performances, particularly near the surface, with CAMS v21r1 marginally outperforming PYVAR-LMDz-SACS ensemble inversions. WRF-Chem regional simulations revealed performance disparities among CH4 products, with positive biases in the boundary layer indicative of an overestimation of wetland emissions by selected wetland flux models. All transport models exhibited a vertically delayed gradient of CH4 mixing ratios near the tropopause, resulting in a positive bias in the stratosphere. The high vertical resolution of CAMS hlkx facilitated a better representation of the vertical structure of CH4 profiles in the stratosphere. Despite the limited spatiotemporal scope of MAGIC2021, we were able to identify the best performing transport models and to evaluate fluxes from different biogeochemical model parametrisations using the MAGIC2021 high-resolution dataset.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Kiruna
genre_facet Kiruna
geographic Kiruna
geographic_facet Kiruna
id ftdlr:oai:elib.dlr.de:209431
institution Open Polar
language unknown
op_collection_id ftdlr
op_relation Langot, Félix und Crevoisier, Cyril und Lauvaux, Thomas und Abdallah, Charbel und Pernin, Jérôme und Xin, Lin und Saunois, Marielle und Guedj, Axel und Ponthieu, Thomas und Roiger, Anke-Elisabeth und Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk und Fiehn, Alina (2024) Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions (AMTD). Copernicus Publications. ISSN 1867-8610. (eingereichter Beitrag)
publishDate 2024
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdlr:oai:elib.dlr.de:209431 2025-06-15T14:33:05+00:00 Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements Langot, Félix Crevoisier, Cyril Lauvaux, Thomas Abdallah, Charbel Pernin, Jérôme Xin, Lin Saunois, Marielle Guedj, Axel Ponthieu, Thomas Roiger, Anke-Elisabeth Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk Fiehn, Alina 2024 https://elib.dlr.de/209431/ https://editor.copernicus.org/EGUsphere/ms_records/egusphere-2024-3559 unknown Copernicus Publications Langot, Félix und Crevoisier, Cyril und Lauvaux, Thomas und Abdallah, Charbel und Pernin, Jérôme und Xin, Lin und Saunois, Marielle und Guedj, Axel und Ponthieu, Thomas und Roiger, Anke-Elisabeth und Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk und Fiehn, Alina (2024) Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions (AMTD). Copernicus Publications. ISSN 1867-8610. (eingereichter Beitrag) Atmosphärische Spurenstoffe Zeitschriftenbeitrag NonPeerReviewed 2024 ftdlr 2025-06-04T04:58:09Z Methane (CH4) fluxes emitted by wetlands at high latitudes remain one of the largest sources of uncertainties in global methane budgets. At these latitudes, flux estimation approaches, such as atmospheric inversions, are impacted by improper characterisation of atmospheric transport due to challenging meteorological conditions and a lack of measurements. Here, we assess the performances of ERA5 reanalysis, mesoscale simulations from WRF-Chem, and various atmospheric transport models from several global and regional inversion systems using meteorological and CH4 in-situ measurements collected during the MAGIC2021 campaign near Kiruna, Sweden. Over six measurements days in August 2021, ERA5 exhibited better agreement with observations than WRF-Chem thanks to data assimilation. Nevertheless, WRF-Chem demonstrated proficiency in simulating local atmospheric dynamics. Among global simulations of atmospheric concentrations of CH4, inversion-optimised simulations of CH4 concentrations yielded the best performances, particularly near the surface, with CAMS v21r1 marginally outperforming PYVAR-LMDz-SACS ensemble inversions. WRF-Chem regional simulations revealed performance disparities among CH4 products, with positive biases in the boundary layer indicative of an overestimation of wetland emissions by selected wetland flux models. All transport models exhibited a vertically delayed gradient of CH4 mixing ratios near the tropopause, resulting in a positive bias in the stratosphere. The high vertical resolution of CAMS hlkx facilitated a better representation of the vertical structure of CH4 profiles in the stratosphere. Despite the limited spatiotemporal scope of MAGIC2021, we were able to identify the best performing transport models and to evaluate fluxes from different biogeochemical model parametrisations using the MAGIC2021 high-resolution dataset. Article in Journal/Newspaper Kiruna Unknown Kiruna
spellingShingle Atmosphärische Spurenstoffe
Langot, Félix
Crevoisier, Cyril
Lauvaux, Thomas
Abdallah, Charbel
Pernin, Jérôme
Xin, Lin
Saunois, Marielle
Guedj, Axel
Ponthieu, Thomas
Roiger, Anke-Elisabeth
Gottschaldt, Klaus-Dirk
Fiehn, Alina
Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements
title Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements
title_full Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements
title_fullStr Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements
title_short Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements
title_sort evaluating weather and chemical transport models at high latitudes using magic2021 airborne measurements
topic Atmosphärische Spurenstoffe
topic_facet Atmosphärische Spurenstoffe
url https://elib.dlr.de/209431/
https://editor.copernicus.org/EGUsphere/ms_records/egusphere-2024-3559