Dielectric sea-ice properties examined by GNSS reflectometry: Findings of the MOSAiC expedition
The dielectric properties of sea ice differ significantly from the open-water surface when we consider the L-band frequency range of GNSS signals. In contrast to water, the signal's penetration into sea ice can reach several decimeters depending on properties like salinity, temperature and thic...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference Object |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://elib.dlr.de/142427/ https://elib.dlr.de/142427/1/210426_mosaic-ice_semmling_et_al_no_marks.pdf |
| Summary: | The dielectric properties of sea ice differ significantly from the open-water surface when we consider the L-band frequency range of GNSS signals. In contrast to water, the signal's penetration into sea ice can reach several decimeters depending on properties like salinity, temperature and thickness. Exploiting these different dielectric properties is a key to use GNSS for sea-ice remote sensing. For this purpose, GNSS reflectometry measurements have been conducted over the Arctic Ocean during the MOSAiC expedition (Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate). A combined receiver setup was used that allows the here described reflectometry study and another study for atmosphere sounding. The setup was mounted, in close cooperation with the Alfred-Wegener-Institute (AWI), on the German research icebreaker Polarstern that drifted during nine months of the expedition with the Arctic sea ice. Here, an initial study is presented that focuses on the expedition's first leg in autumn 2019 when the ship started drifting at about 85°N to 87°N in the Siberian Sector of the Arctic. Profiles of seaice reflectivity are derived with daily resolution considering reflection data recorded at left-handed (LH) and right-handed (RH) circular polarization. Respective model predictions of reflectivity are assuming a sea-ice bulk medium or a sea-ice slab. The later allows to include the effect of signal penetration down to the underlying water. Results of comparison between LH profiles and bulk model confirm the reflectivity contrast (about 10 dB) between sea ice and water. The particularly low level of LH reflectivity in the late observation period (December 2019) indicates the presence of low-saline multiyear (MY) ice. A bias due to snow accumulating on the ice surface may occur. A snow-extended reflection model, driven by additional snow data, can help in future for clarification. Anomalies of observed reflectivity with respect to bulk model predictions are especially obvious at lowest elevation angles. ... |
|---|