Small Innovative Launcher for Europe: Achievement of the H2020 Project SMILE
Today's market for small satellites is expanding, but there is little capacity for affordable, dedicated launches. Launch costs of less than €50,000 per kg are required to compete with piggyback options and ride-shares; hence, cost reduction is essential. Fourteen European companies and institu...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference Object |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://elib.dlr.de/119479/ https://iafastro.directory/iac/paper/id/37468/summary/ |
| Summary: | Today's market for small satellites is expanding, but there is little capacity for affordable, dedicated launches. Launch costs of less than €50,000 per kg are required to compete with piggyback options and ride-shares; hence, cost reduction is essential. Fourteen European companies and institutes have joined forces in a Horizon2020 project called "SMall Innovative Launcher for Europe" (SMILE). The project aims at designing a launcher for satellites up to 70 kg and a European launch facility in northern Norway. Furthermore, the readiness level of critical technologies on propulsion, avionics, and cost-effective manufacturing is increased. As the development time of small satellites can be quite short, the launch rate (time-to-launch) is considered a key requirement. An effective and efficient organisation, including supply chain, is needed to maintain the launch cadence and to reduce operational cost, both of which are needed to deliver a commercially viable service. Both liquid and hybrid rocket engines are considered for this small launcher: a high-performance LOX/kerosene engine and a low-cost H2O2/HTPB engine. The reusable liquid engine, for which hot firing tests are scheduled in 2017, uses a ceramic-based, transpiration cooled combustion chamber and a 3D-printed injector. The H2O2/HTPB hybrid engine technology offers simplicity of the architecture and uses green, storable propellants. Upgrades from the existing engine are then considered, notably by increasing the performances and reducing the dry mass. With a choice of two types of engines, different configurations are analysed in a two- or three-stage set-up using a multidisciplinary design approach including steps from geometry set-up to trajectory optimisation. Preliminary cost estimations and readiness levels are used as complementary metrics. A trade-off is performed to select materials and structural elements to withstand the most demanding loading cases. To minimise the mass, composite sandwich structures are proposed. A suitable automated ... |
|---|