Additional Turkic and Tungusic Borrowings into Yukaghir IV
Continuing on previous research, in this fourth part of a paper series, a total of sixteen newly found suggested borrowings from the Turkic, Tungusic and Mongolic languages into the Yukaghir languages and dialects of far northeastern Siberia are presented as loanword etymologies, as well as ten most...
| Published in: | Journal of Old Turkic Studies |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Erdem UÇAR
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jots/issue/52134/672873 https://doi.org/10.35236/jots.672873 |
| Summary: | Continuing on previous research, in this fourth part of a paper series, a total of sixteen newly found suggested borrowings from the Turkic, Tungusic and Mongolic languages into the Yukaghir languages and dialects of far northeastern Siberia are presented as loanword etymologies, as well as ten most tentative borrowing suggestions from the same sources, tentative only due to numerous semantic or phonological problems. The chronology of the totally twenty-six borrowing suggested is considered again to some degree, and solid phonological and semantic considerations are given for each suggestion, and other possible cognates or borrowings in the surrounding languages are also discussed. The results continue to highlight the extensive historical social contacts between the Yukaghir populations and surrounding tribes. Continuing on previous research, in thisfourth part of a paper series, a total of sixteen newly found suggestedborrowings from the Turkic, Tungusic and Mongolic languages into the Yukaghirlanguages and dialects of far northeastern Siberia are presented as loanwordetymologies, as well as ten most tentative borrowing suggestions from the samesources, tentative only due to numerous semantic or phonological problems. Thechronology of the totally twenty-six borrowing suggested is considered again tosome degree, and solid phonological and semantic considerations are given foreach suggestion, and other possible cognates or borrowings in the surroundinglanguages are also discussed. The results continue to highlight the extensivehistorical social contacts between the Yukaghir populations and surroundingtribes. |
|---|