Prevalence and clinical associations of wheezes and crackles in the general population: the Tromsø study

Abstract Background Wheezes and crackles are well-known signs of lung diseases, but can also be heard in apparently healthy adults. However, their prevalence in a general population has been sparsely described. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of wheezes and crackles in a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Aviles-Solis, C. Jácome, A. Davidsen, R. Einarsen, S. Vanbelle, H. Pasterkamp, H. Melbye
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: figshare 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4663289.v1
https://springernature.figshare.com/collections/Prevalence_and_clinical_associations_of_wheezes_and_crackles_in_the_general_population_the_Troms_study/4663289/1
id ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4663289.v1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdatacite:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4663289.v1 2023-05-15T18:34:55+02:00 Prevalence and clinical associations of wheezes and crackles in the general population: the Tromsø study J. Aviles-Solis C. Jácome A. Davidsen R. Einarsen S. Vanbelle H. Pasterkamp H. Melbye 2019 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4663289.v1 https://springernature.figshare.com/collections/Prevalence_and_clinical_associations_of_wheezes_and_crackles_in_the_general_population_the_Troms_study/4663289/1 unknown figshare https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0928-1 https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4663289 CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 CC-BY Medicine Biotechnology Immunology FOS Clinical medicine 19999 Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified FOS Mathematics Cancer Collection article 2019 ftdatacite https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4663289.v1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0928-1 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4663289 2021-11-05T12:55:41Z Abstract Background Wheezes and crackles are well-known signs of lung diseases, but can also be heard in apparently healthy adults. However, their prevalence in a general population has been sparsely described. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of wheezes and crackles in a large general adult population and explore associations with self-reported disease, smoking status and lung function. Methods We recorded lung sounds in 4033 individuals 40 years or older and collected information on self-reported disease. Pulse oximetry and spirometry were carried out. We estimated age-standardized prevalence of wheezes and crackles and associations between wheezes and crackles and variables of interest were analyzed with univariable and multivariable logistic regressions. Results Twenty-eight percent of individuals had wheezes or crackles. The age-standardized prevalence of wheezes was 18.6% in women and 15.3% in men, and of crackles, 10.8 and 9.4%, respectively. Wheezes were mostly found during expiration and crackles during inspiration. Significant predictors of expiratory wheezes in multivariable analyses were age (10 years increase - OR 1.18, 95%CI 1.09–1.30), female gender (1.45, 1.2–1.8), self-reported asthma (1.36, 1.00–1.83), and current smoking (1.70, 1.28–2.23). The most important predictors of inspiratory crackles were age (1.76, 1.57–1.99), current smoking, (1.94, 1.40–2.69), mMRC ≥2 (1.79, 1.18–2.65), SpO2 (0.88, 0.81–0.96), and FEV1 Z-score (0.86, 0.77–0.95). Conclusions Nearly over a quarter of adults present adventitious lung sounds on auscultation. Age was the most important predictor of adventitious sounds, particularly crackles. The adventitious sounds were also associated with self-reported disease, current smoking and measures of lung function. The presence of findings in two or more auscultation sites was associated with a higher risk of decreased lung function than solitary findings. Article in Journal/Newspaper Tromsø DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology) Tromsø
institution Open Polar
collection DataCite Metadata Store (German National Library of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftdatacite
language unknown
topic Medicine
Biotechnology
Immunology
FOS Clinical medicine
19999 Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified
FOS Mathematics
Cancer
spellingShingle Medicine
Biotechnology
Immunology
FOS Clinical medicine
19999 Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified
FOS Mathematics
Cancer
J. Aviles-Solis
C. Jácome
A. Davidsen
R. Einarsen
S. Vanbelle
H. Pasterkamp
H. Melbye
Prevalence and clinical associations of wheezes and crackles in the general population: the Tromsø study
topic_facet Medicine
Biotechnology
Immunology
FOS Clinical medicine
19999 Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified
FOS Mathematics
Cancer
description Abstract Background Wheezes and crackles are well-known signs of lung diseases, but can also be heard in apparently healthy adults. However, their prevalence in a general population has been sparsely described. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of wheezes and crackles in a large general adult population and explore associations with self-reported disease, smoking status and lung function. Methods We recorded lung sounds in 4033 individuals 40 years or older and collected information on self-reported disease. Pulse oximetry and spirometry were carried out. We estimated age-standardized prevalence of wheezes and crackles and associations between wheezes and crackles and variables of interest were analyzed with univariable and multivariable logistic regressions. Results Twenty-eight percent of individuals had wheezes or crackles. The age-standardized prevalence of wheezes was 18.6% in women and 15.3% in men, and of crackles, 10.8 and 9.4%, respectively. Wheezes were mostly found during expiration and crackles during inspiration. Significant predictors of expiratory wheezes in multivariable analyses were age (10 years increase - OR 1.18, 95%CI 1.09–1.30), female gender (1.45, 1.2–1.8), self-reported asthma (1.36, 1.00–1.83), and current smoking (1.70, 1.28–2.23). The most important predictors of inspiratory crackles were age (1.76, 1.57–1.99), current smoking, (1.94, 1.40–2.69), mMRC ≥2 (1.79, 1.18–2.65), SpO2 (0.88, 0.81–0.96), and FEV1 Z-score (0.86, 0.77–0.95). Conclusions Nearly over a quarter of adults present adventitious lung sounds on auscultation. Age was the most important predictor of adventitious sounds, particularly crackles. The adventitious sounds were also associated with self-reported disease, current smoking and measures of lung function. The presence of findings in two or more auscultation sites was associated with a higher risk of decreased lung function than solitary findings.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author J. Aviles-Solis
C. Jácome
A. Davidsen
R. Einarsen
S. Vanbelle
H. Pasterkamp
H. Melbye
author_facet J. Aviles-Solis
C. Jácome
A. Davidsen
R. Einarsen
S. Vanbelle
H. Pasterkamp
H. Melbye
author_sort J. Aviles-Solis
title Prevalence and clinical associations of wheezes and crackles in the general population: the Tromsø study
title_short Prevalence and clinical associations of wheezes and crackles in the general population: the Tromsø study
title_full Prevalence and clinical associations of wheezes and crackles in the general population: the Tromsø study
title_fullStr Prevalence and clinical associations of wheezes and crackles in the general population: the Tromsø study
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and clinical associations of wheezes and crackles in the general population: the Tromsø study
title_sort prevalence and clinical associations of wheezes and crackles in the general population: the tromsø study
publisher figshare
publishDate 2019
url https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4663289.v1
https://springernature.figshare.com/collections/Prevalence_and_clinical_associations_of_wheezes_and_crackles_in_the_general_population_the_Troms_study/4663289/1
geographic Tromsø
geographic_facet Tromsø
genre Tromsø
genre_facet Tromsø
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0928-1
https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4663289
op_rights CC BY 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4663289.v1
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0928-1
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4663289
_version_ 1766219921903058944