Deformational history and thermochronology of Wrangel Island, East Siberian Shelf and coastal Chukotka, Arctic Russia
In Arctic Russia, south of Wrangel Island, Jura–Cretaceous fold belt structures are cut by c. 108–100 Ma plutonic rocks and a c. 103 Ma migmatitic complex (U–Pb, zircon) that had cooled by c. 96 Ma ( 40 Ar/ 39 Ar biotite); the structures are unconformably overlain by c. 88 Ma and younger (U–Pb, zirc...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
Figshare
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3741272.v2 https://figshare.com/collections/Deformational_history_and_thermochronology_of_Wrangel_Island_East_Siberian_Shelf_and_coastal_Chukotka_Arctic_Russia/3741272/2 |
| Summary: | In Arctic Russia, south of Wrangel Island, Jura–Cretaceous fold belt structures are cut by c. 108–100 Ma plutonic rocks and a c. 103 Ma migmatitic complex (U–Pb, zircon) that had cooled by c. 96 Ma ( 40 Ar/ 39 Ar biotite); the structures are unconformably overlain by c. 88 Ma and younger (U–Pb, zircon) volcanic rocks. Wrangel Island, with a similar stratigraphy and added exposure of Neoproterozoic basement rocks, was thought to represent the westwards continuation of the Jura–Cretaceous Brookian thrust belt of Alaska. A penetrative, high-strain, S-dipping foliation formed during north–south stretching in Triassic and older rocks, with stretched pebble aspect ratios of c. 2:1:0.5 to 10:1:0.1. Deformation was at greenschist facies (chlorite + white mica; biotite at depth; temperature c. 300–450°C). Microstructures suggest deformation mostly by pure shear and north–south stretching; the quartz textures and lattice preferred orientations suggest temperatures of c. 300–450°C. 40 Ar/ 39 Ar K-feldspar spectra ( n = 1) and muscovite ( n = 3) (total gas ages c. 611–514 Ma) in Neoproterozoic basement rocks are consistent with a short thermal pulse during deformation at 105–100 Ma. Apatite fission track ages ( n = 7) indicate cooling to near-surface conditions at c. 95 Ma. The shared thermal histories of Wrangel Island and Chukotka suggest that the Wrangel deformation is related to post-shortening, north–south extension, not to fold–thrust belt structures. Seismic data (line AR-5) indicate a sharp Moho and strong sub-horizontal reflectivity in the lower and middle crust beneath the region. Wrangel Island probably representsa crustal-scale extensional boudin between the North Chukchi and Longa basins. |
|---|