The NEE and CH 4 flux simulated by the CRU-forced run and the RCAO-forced run (uptake: negative, release: positive) ...

Table 1. The NEE and CH 4 flux simulated by the CRU-forced run and the RCAO-forced run (uptake: negative, release: positive). CH 4 values are for the wetland fraction of the study area only. Abstract One major challenge to the improvement of regional climate scenarios for the northern high latitudes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang, Wenxin, Paul A Miller, Benjamin Smith, Rita Wania, Torben Koenigk, Döscher, Ralf
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: IOP Publishing 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1011565.v1
https://iop.figshare.com/articles/dataset/___The_NEE_and_CH_sub_4_sub_flux_simulated_by_the_CRU_forced_run_and_the_RCAO_forced_run_uptake_nega/1011565/1
Description
Summary:Table 1. The NEE and CH 4 flux simulated by the CRU-forced run and the RCAO-forced run (uptake: negative, release: positive). CH 4 values are for the wetland fraction of the study area only. Abstract One major challenge to the improvement of regional climate scenarios for the northern high latitudes is to understand land surface feedbacks associated with vegetation shifts and ecosystem biogeochemical cycling. We employed a customized, Arctic version of the individual-based dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS to simulate the dynamics of upland and wetland ecosystems under a regional climate model–downscaled future climate projection for the Arctic and Subarctic. The simulated vegetation distribution (1961–1990) agreed well with a composite map of actual arctic vegetation. In the future (2051–2080), a poleward advance of the forest–tundra boundary, an expansion of tall shrub tundra, and a dominance shift from deciduous to evergreen boreal conifer forest over northern Eurasia were simulated. Ecosystems continued ...