Pamphilius virescens Malaise 1931 ...
Pamphilius virescens Malaise, 1931 (Figs 130, 131) (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11405328) Pamphilius virescens Malaise, 1931: 62; Gussakovskij, 1935: 174, 375; Verzhutskij, 1966: 27; Beneš, 1974: 303, 311; Shinohara, 1995: 55; Zhelochovtsev & Zinovjev, 1995: 398; Shinohara, 2002b: 426; S...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6903080 https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.6903080 |
| Summary: | Pamphilius virescens Malaise, 1931 (Figs 130, 131) (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11405328) Pamphilius virescens Malaise, 1931: 62; Gussakovskij, 1935: 174, 375; Verzhutskij, 1966: 27; Beneš, 1974: 303, 311; Shinohara, 1995: 55; Zhelochovtsev & Zinovjev, 1995: 398; Shinohara, 2002b: 426; Shinohara, 2004: 263; Shinohara & Lelej, 2007: 936, 942; Taeger et al., 2010: 91; Sundukov & Lelej, 2012: 109; Sundukov, 2017: 106; Lee et al., 2019: 11; Shinohara, 2019: 12; Shinohara, 2020: 20, 249. See Shinohara (1995) for more references. Lectotype designation. Malaise (1931) described this species based on “ 2♂♂ und 2♀♀ aus Klutchi, Kamtchatka ” but did not designate a holotype. We hereby designate the female labeled “Typus” in Malaise’s collection (NHRS), as lectotype. It is labeled “ Kamtschatka, Malaise” “Typus” “ Pamphilius virescens Mal. Type Malaise det.” “818”. It was treated as the holotype by Beneš (1974) and Shinohara (1995) and fully redescribed by Beneš (1974). Material examined. Thirteen ... : Published as part of Shinohara, Akihiko, Kramp, Katja & Taeger, Andreas, 2022, The Pamphiliinae of the Russian Far East and Korea (Hymenoptera, Pamphiliidae), pp. 1-251 in Zootaxa 5167 (1) on page 73, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5167.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/6876483 ... |
|---|