Cecidophyes borealis Lindroth 1904 ...
10. Cecidophyes borealis (Lindroth 1904) Lindroth 1904 — Acta Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn., 26: 8; Liro 1940 — Ann. Zool. Soc. Zool. Bot. Fenn. Vanamo, 8(1): 5–6, fig. 3 (schematic drawing) –4 (symptoms); Roivainen 1951— Acta Entomol. Fenn., 8: figs 18‒19; Liro & Roivainen 1951 — Anim. Fenn., 6: 158,...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Zenodo
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6178694 https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.6178694 |
Summary: | 10. Cecidophyes borealis (Lindroth 1904) Lindroth 1904 — Acta Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn., 26: 8; Liro 1940 — Ann. Zool. Soc. Zool. Bot. Fenn. Vanamo, 8(1): 5–6, fig. 3 (schematic drawing) –4 (symptoms); Roivainen 1951— Acta Entomol. Fenn., 8: figs 18‒19; Liro & Roivainen 1951 — Anim. Fenn., 6: 158, fig. 75. Type data. Draba norvegica Gunnerus (= D. rupestris R. Br. as reported by Lindroth 1904), Norvegian draba; Kilpisjärvi, Lapponia enontekiöensis, Finland. Further recorded hosts. Draba incana L., D. nivalis Liljebl. General distribution. Palaearctic (Finland; Hungary; Russia). Relation to the host. The mite is associated with marginal leaf rolling. Remarks. Davis et al. (1982) and Amrine and Stasny (1994) missed the fact that three different mites were involved under the name borealis [Tegonotus, Cecidophyes, Coptophylla]. Roivainen (1951) erroneously combined Eriophyes borealis Liro 1940 and Phyllocoptes borealis Liro 1940 (on Viola biflora L.) jointly under Coptophylla. Both species belong in the ... : Published as part of Monfreda, Rosita & Lillo, Enrico De, 2012, Eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) on Brassicaceae: a new species of Metaculus from Turkey and remarks on other species associated with brassicaceous plants, pp. 47-60 in Zootaxa 3154 on page 57, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.210175 ... |
---|