Symplectoscyphus subarticulatus Coughtrey 1875

Symplectoscyphus cf. subarticulatus (Coughtrey, 1875) (Plate 3 D; Fig. 7 K–M; Table 10) Material examined . Corral, Chaihuin/Huiro, lat. -39.95000, long. - 73.61667, 08.viii.2012, 14 m, sample 10: a few broken stems up to 2.2 cm high, some fragments bearing gonothecae (MHNG-INVE- 86228). Description...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Galea, Horia R., Schories, Dirk, Försterra, Günter, Häussermann, Verena
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6143198
https://zenodo.org/record/6143198
Description
Summary:Symplectoscyphus cf. subarticulatus (Coughtrey, 1875) (Plate 3 D; Fig. 7 K–M; Table 10) Material examined . Corral, Chaihuin/Huiro, lat. -39.95000, long. - 73.61667, 08.viii.2012, 14 m, sample 10: a few broken stems up to 2.2 cm high, some fragments bearing gonothecae (MHNG-INVE- 86228). Description . Colony coplanar; stems monosiphonic, geniculate (Pl. 3 D), perisarc smooth or with up to 3 annulations above origin from stolon, followed by a portion bearing a few alternate hydrothecae; remainder of stem divided into internodes by oblique constrictions of the perisarc sloping alternately in opposite directions. Internodes of irregular length, composed of a succession of 2–20 subopposite hydrothecae, the last followed on the opposite side by a short apophysis supporting a cladium, and an axillar hydrotheca (Fig. 7 K); number of hydrothecae per internode increasing generally from basal part of stems upwards, though exceptions occur towards their middle and upper parts. Cladia borne of corresponding stem apophyses, delimited from the latter by constrictions of the perisarc; straight, undivided into internodes, composed of a varied number of subopposite hydrothecae, more approximate than those of the stem; may occasionally rebranch once. Hydrothecae (Fig. 7 L) tubular, immersed in the stem and cladia for about two-thirds their adaxial length, distally bent outwards; free adcauline wall almost straight, but tilted adaxially just below aperture; adnate part slightly curved; abcauline wall concave in middle; aperture with three pointed cusps separated by moderately deep embayments; operculum of three triangular flaps. Gonothecae, female in present material, given off from cladia, below the hydrothecal bases; ovoid in overall shape, back side flat to concave, being closely pressed against the cladium; walls with 8–9 independent, circular ribs with thickened free margin, not spirally arranged; distally, a small plateau giving rise in its centre to a short, trumpet shaped terminal neck, bearing an aperture distally (Fig. 7 M). Remarks . The present specimens are fragmentary and monosiphonic, and do not display neither the characteristic growth form illustrated by Trebilcock (1928, pl. 7 Fig. 7), nor the regularity in the structure of stem, as described and depicted by Ralph (1961), thus explaining the description given above. The Patagonian S. divaricatus (Busk, 1852), whose type was rediscovered by Totton (1930) and redescribed by Ralph (1961), somehow resemble the present species. According to the latter author, it is a less robust species, has smaller and more spaced hydrothecae, and their marginal cusps are more sharply pointed. Distribution in Chile . Chiloé (Leloup 1974) and Corral (present report). World records . New Zealand (Vervoort & Watson 2003), Lord Howe Island (Briggs 1918), southern Australia (Whitelegge 1899), Kerguelen (Millard 1977). TABLE 9 . Comparison of Symplectoscyphus semper sp. nov. with congeners provided with transversely-ribbed gonothecae. The abbreviations used for the hydrotheca are as follows: Fad = free adaxial side, Aad = adnate adaxial side, Ab = abcauline side, Ap = diameter at aperture; and for the gonotheca: L = length, W = maximum width. All measurements are given in µm and, when not available, the abbreviation N.A. is used. Colony, stem and Internodes (of both stem Hydrotheca Gonotheca Geographical Reference(s) Species branches/cladia and branches) Shape and size Terminal tube distribution bathyalis Colony likely coplanar, Long, slender, each Large, cylindrical, facing Pear-shaped, with ca . 7 Short, flaring distally Occurs in Vervoort Vervoort, stems monosiphonic, bearing a distal outward and slightly upward, annular ridges, L = 1350 – scattered (1972, 1993) 1972 slender, cladia given hydrotheca, and adnate for less than 1 / 3 rd, Fad = 1480, W = 1010–1150 localities in the off irregularly occasionally a lateral 595–675, Aad = 285–310, Ab = Atlantic and apophysis below 610–675, Ap = 350–375 Pacific raised fluted frills, measurements N.A. exsertus Colony likely coplanar, Of varied length Long, tubular, facing upward, Ovoid, provided with ca . 7 Short, greatly Only known Allman Allman, stems monosiphonic, adnate for 1 / 3 rd, measurements annular ridges, expanding distally from Heard (1888) 1888) ramified irregularly N.A. measurements N.A. Island and subdichotomously …….. Continued to the next page TABLE 9. ( Continued ) Species Colony, stem and Internodes (of both stem Hydrotheca Gonotheca Geographical Reference(s) branches/cladia and branches) Shape and size Terminal tube distribution filiformis Colonies coplanar, in dense, Of varied length, though Tubular, facing outwards and Sexually dimorphic, female Short and wide in Scattered records Totton (1930), Allman, 1888 parallel assemblages, stems with generally 2–3 slightly upwards, nearly half usually with additional females, tubular and from various Galea (2007) indistinct, monosiphonic, hydrothecae between adnate, Fad = 242–280, Aad = annulations and wider distal slender in males subantarctic branching consecutive branches 247–269, Ab = 335–385, Ap = tube, L = 1213–1596 (♀), localities pseudodichotomous 154–165 824–989 (♂); W = 740–894 (♀), 632–742 (♂) alternate hydrothecae and a lateral 235, Aad = 335–380, Ab = 290 – upturned flanges, L = 1815 – to aperture apophysis 315, Ap = 215–225 1975, W = 640–705 Colony coplanar, stems Short, comprising 3 Tubular, deeply immersed, for at Ovoid, narrowing basally, Up to 225 µm long, New Zealand, Ralph (1961), subarticulatus branched, polysiphonic, hydrothecae and a lateral least 2 / 3 rd, Fad = 72–140, Aad = with 5–8 conspicuous widest distally in southern Australia, Vervoort & Coughtrey, cladia regularly alternate apophysis 350–390, Ab = 225–255, Ap = deeply flared annulations, L females Chile Watson (2003)) 170–175 = 1315–1475 (♀), 1150– 1230 (♂); W = 835–870 (♀), 900–985 (♂) tricuspidatus Colonies coplanar, stems Short, geniculate, bearing Tubular, straight to slightly Ovoid, with 7–9 deep Short, gradually Circumpolar in Hincks (1868), Alder, 1856) monosiphonic, alternately a hydrotheca distally, curved outward, adnate for 1 / 3 rd transverse ridges, L = ca . expanding from base northern Atlantic Calder (1970), branched or divided occasionally a lateral to 2 / 3 rd, Fad = 391–465, Aad = 1000, W = ca . 700 to aperture and Pacific Schuchert (2001) dichotomously apophysis below 227–258, Ab = 492–565, Ap = 232–269 tuba Totton, Colonies straggling Varied in length, though Short, contracting from base to Ovoid, with 8–10 deep, 160–192 µm long, New Zealand, New Totton (1930), multipinnate, stems mostly long, slender, margin, sometimes almost upturned flanges, L = 1120 – trumpet-shaped, with Caledonia Watson (2003) monosiphonic slightly geniculate, each tubular, directed upwards, almost 1200, W = 760–800 wide (240–280 µm) bearing a hydrotheca, half adnate, sometimes free part aperture occasionally a lateral shorter, Fad = 248–312, Aad = apophysis below 296–360, Ab = 416–440, Ap = 192–216 Sertularia unilateralis Lamouroux, 1824: 615, pl. 90 Figs 1 –3.― Van Praët, 1979: 903, Fig. 55 A, B. Sertularella unilateralis ― Hartlaub, 1901 b: 42, Fig. 20; 1905: 628, Fig. T 3.― Billard, 1909 a: 1065; 1909 b: 315, Figs 3, 4; 1910: 36. Sertularella pulchella Jäderholm, 1904: viii; 1905: 30, pl. 12 Figs 4 –7. Sertularella macrogona Trebilcock, 1928: 11, pl. 1 Fig. 4 ( syn.nov. ). Symplectoscyphus macrogonus ― Millard, 1957: 219.― Ralph, 1961: 798, Fig. 14 A, B.― Millard, 1964: 51; 1975: 316, Fig. 102 D–G.― Gili et al ., 1989: 105, Fig. 29 B.― Vervoort & Watson, 2003: 264, Fig. 62 A, B. Sertularella rentoni Bartlett, 1907: 43, Fig. ( syn.nov. )― Mulder & Trebilcock, 1914: 9, pl. 1 Fig. 4, pl. 3 Fig. 1.― Bale, 1919: 337, pl. 16 Fig. 2.― Trebilcock, 1928: 10, pl. 1 Fig. 3. Symplectoscyphus rentoni ― Stechow, 1922: 148; 1923: 172.― Ralph, 1961: 804, Fig. 16 A–C.― Vervoort & Watson, 2003: 227, Fig. 54 A, B. Symplectoscyphus sp. 2 ― Galea & Schories, 2012 a: 56, Fig. 7 J. Material examined . Corral, Chaihuin/Huiro, lat. -39.95000, long. - 73.61667, 09.vii.2012, 5‒ 8 m, sample 10: male colony on seaweed, stems up to 7 mm high (MHNG-INVE- 86238). Remarks . The identification of the present material was facilitated thanks to the account by Billard (1909 b), who re-examined the type of Sertularia unilateralis Lamouroux, 1824. This species is characterized by the following features: 1) the stems are short, monosiphonic, unbranched or rarely branched, divided into very short internodes delimited by oblique nodes; 2) each internode bears a long, tubular hydrotheca, facing up- and outward; 3) there are generally three internal, well-developed, submarginal projections of perisarc; 4) the gonotheca is urnshaped in frontal view, flattened laterally, and bears a short, distal, tronconical tube provided with the aperture distally. After a careful study of the relevant literature, it appears that the characteristic shape of the gonotheca is unique among the genus, and this feature could be exploited confidently to solve the taxonomy of several nominal species. However, the occurrence of submarginal cusps within the hydrotheca proves variable among specimens from various localities around the world. Unlike Vervoort & Watson (2003), who consider that S. macrogonus (Trebilcock, 1928) is a species devoid of intrathecal cusps, we include it in the synonymy of the present species. In doing this, we follow the opinion expressed by Millard (1957, p. 220), who found that the occurrence of cusps “is apparently not a constant feature for the species, for although internal teeth are normally present, they may be absent in several hydrothecae on a stem, or even on a complete stem. It cannot therefore be used to establish a separate species”. It seems thus that the material from southern Africa [(Millard 1957, Gili et al . 1989)] represents a transition between the New Zealand form, not provided with intrathecal projections, and the specimens from around South America that exhibit this feature. We also agree with Billard (1910) that the peculiar gonotheca, as well as the shape of the hydrotheca and the presence of submarginal cusps make the tricuspidate Sertularella pulchella Jäderholm, 1904 indistinguishable from S. unilateralis . Bale (1919) noted obvious similarities between S. rentoni Bartlett, 1907 and S. unilateralis , but refrained from uniting them on the account of the presence of intrahydrothecal cusps in the latter. Based on the conclusions raised by Millard (1957), we now include S. rentoni in the synonymy of the present species. Distribution in Chile . Only known from Chaihuin (present report); this is the first record for the country. World records . New Zealand, Southeast Australia (Vervoort & Watson 2003), South Africa (Millard 1975), Namibia (Gili et al . 1989), Falkland islands (Lamouroux 1824, Jäderholm 1905). : Published as part of Galea, Horia R., Schories, Dirk, Försterra, Günter & Häussermann, Verena, 2014, New species and new records of hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) from Chile, pp. 1-50 in Zootaxa 3852 (1) on pages 37-41, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3852.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/286956 : {"references": ["Coughtrey, M. (1875) Notes on the New Zealand Hydroideae. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 7, 281 - 293.", "Trebilcock, R. E. (1928) Notes on New Zealand Hydroida. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 41 (1), 1 - 31.", "Ralph, P. M. (1961) New Zealand thecate hydroids. Part III. Family Sertulariidae. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 88 (4), 749 - 838.", "Totton, A. K. (1930) Coelenterata. Part V. Hydroida. Natural History Report of the British Antarctic (\" Terra Nova \") Expedition, 1910. Zoology, 5 (5), 131 - 252.", "Leloup, E. (1974) Hydropolypes calyptoblastiques du Chili. Report no. 48 of the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948 - 1949. Sarsia, 55, 1 - 61.", "Vervoort, W. & Watson, J. E. (2003) The marine fauna of New Zealand: Leptothecata (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) (thecate hydroids). NIWA Biodiversity Memoir, 119, 1 - 538.", "Briggs, E. A. (1918) Descriptions of two new hydroids, and a revision of the hydroid-fauna of Lord Howe Island. Records of the Australian Museum, 12 (3), 27 - 47. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0067 - 1975.12.1918.878", "Whitelegge, T. (1899) List of the marine and fresh-water invertebrate fauna of Port Jackson. Journal of the Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, 23, 163 - 323.", "Millard, N. A. H. (1977) Hydroids from the Kerguelen and Crozet shelves, collected by the cruise MD. 0 3 of the Marion- Dufresne. Annals of the South African Museum, 73 (1), 1 - 47.", "Allman, G. J. (1888) Report on the Hydroida dredged by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873 - 76. Part II. - The Tubularinae, Corymorphinae, Campanularinae, Sertularinae and Thalamophora. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H. M. S. Challenger during the year 1873 - 76, Zoology, 23 (70), 1 - 90.", "Hincks, T. (1868) A history of British hydroid zoophytes. John van Voorst, London, 338 pp.", "Calder, D. R. (1970) Thecate hydroids from the shelf waters of northern Canada. Journal of Fisheries Research, Board of Canada, 27, 1501 - 1547. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1139 / f 70 - 175", "Schuchert, P. (2001) Hydroids of Greenland and Iceland. Meddelelser om Gronland, Bioscience, 53, 1 - 184.", "Lamouroux, J. V. F. (1824) Description des polypiers flexibles. In: Quoy, J. R. C. & Gaimard, J. P. (Eds.), Voyage autour du monde, entrepris par ordre du Roi, execute sur les corvettes de S. M. l'Uranie et la Physicienne, pendant les annees 1817, 1818, 1819 et 1820. Zoologie, Pillet Aine, Paris, pp. 603 - 643.", "Van Praet, M. (1979) Les types de polypes d'Hydraires conserves au Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris. Bulletin du Museum national d'Histoire naturelle de Paris, (4) 1, Section A (4), 871 - 940.", "Hartlaub, C. (1901 b) Revision der Sertularella - Arten. Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiete der Naturwissenschaften, Hamburg, 16 (2) (1), 1 - 143.", "Billard, A. (1909 a) Sur les Hydroides de la collection Lamouroux. Comptes Rendus des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences de Paris, 148, 1063 - 1065.", "Jaderholm, E. (1904) Mitteilungen ueber einige von der Schwedischen Antarctic-Expedition 1901 - 1903 eingesammelte Hydroiden. Archives de Zoologie Experimentale et Generale, 4 (3), 1 - 14.", "Millard, N. A. H. (1957) The Hydrozoa of False Bay, South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum, 43 (4) (6), 173 - 243.", "Millard, N. A. H. (1964) The Hydrozoa of the South and West coasts of South Africa. Part II. The Lafoeidae, Syntheciidae and Sertulariidae. Annals of the South African Museum, 48 (1), 1 - 56.", "Gili, J. M., Vervoort, W. & Pages, F. (1989) Hydroids from the west African coast: Guinea Bissau, Namibia and South Africa. Scientia Marina, 53 (1), 67 - 112.", "Bartlett, G. C. (1907) Notes on hydroid zoophytes. Geelong Naturalist, Series 3, 2, 35 - 45.", "Mulder, J. F. & Trebilcock, R. E. (1914) Victorian Hydroida. With description of new species. Part III. Geelong Naturalist, 6 (1), 6 - 15.", "Bale, W. M. (1919) Further notes on Australian hydroids. IV. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 31 (2), 327 - 362.", "Stechow, E. (1922) Zur Systematik der Hydrozoen, Stromatopoden, Siphonophoren, Anthozoen und Ctenophoren. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, Series A, 88 (3), 141 - 155.", "Galea, H. R. & Schories, D. (2012 a) Some hydrozoans (Cnidaria) from Central Chile and the Strait of Magellan. Zootaxa, 3296, 19 - 67.", "Billard, A. (1909 b) Revision des especes types d'hydroides de la collection Lamouroux conservee a l'Institut Botanique de Caen. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie, Series 9, 9, 307 - 336.", "Billard, A. (1910) Revision d'une partie de la collection des hydroides du British Museum. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie, Series 9, 11, 1 - 67.", "Millard, N. A. H. (1975) Monograph on the Hydroida of southern Africa. Annals of the South African Museum, 68, 1 - 513.", "Jaderholm, E. (1905) Hydroiden aus antarktischen und subantarktischen Meeren gesammelt von der schwedischen Sudpolar- Expedition. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Sudpolar-Expedition 1901 - 1903, 5 (8), 1 - 41."]}