Platyscelus Bate 1861

Genus Platyscelus Bate, 1861 (Figs 49–50) Typhis Risso, 1816: 122.— Guérin 1825: 755.— Milne-Edwards 1830: 395.— Milne-Edwards 1838: 285.— Lucas 1840: 239.— Milne-Edwards 1840: 71 (key), 94–96.— Lucas 1846: 57.— Dana 1852: 316.— Dana 1853: 1008. Dithyrus Dana, 1852: 316.— Dana 1853: 1008 –1010. Plat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zeidler, Wolfgang
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6069348
https://zenodo.org/record/6069348
Description
Summary:Genus Platyscelus Bate, 1861 (Figs 49–50) Typhis Risso, 1816: 122.— Guérin 1825: 755.— Milne-Edwards 1830: 395.— Milne-Edwards 1838: 285.— Lucas 1840: 239.— Milne-Edwards 1840: 71 (key), 94–96.— Lucas 1846: 57.— Dana 1852: 316.— Dana 1853: 1008. Dithyrus Dana, 1852: 316.— Dana 1853: 1008 –1010. Platyscelus Bate, 1861: 4.— Bate 1862: 329.— Thomson 1879: 244.— Stebbing 1888: 1462.— Spandl 1924a: 35.— Chevreux & Fage 1925: 419 (incl. key).— Schellenberg 1927: 646 –647.— Spandl 1927: 227 (key), 227–228.— Hurley 1955: 187 (key), 189.— Bowman & Gruner 1973: 55 (incl. key).— Zeidler 1978: 39 (incl. key).— Vinogradov et al . 1982: 439 (key), 439– 440.— Shih & Chen 1995: 225 (key), 226.— Vinogradov 1999: 1200 (key), 1201. Eutyphis Claus, 1879: 4 (key), 5.— Claus 1880: 558.— Carus 1885: 424.— Claus 1887: 31 (key), 31-35.— Gerstaecker 1886: 482.— Pirlot 1929: 156. Eutyphes — Bovallius 1887: 45. Type species. Typhis ovoides Risso, 1816 by monotypy. Type material could not be found at the MNHN or any other major European museum (see acknowledgments). Despite Risso’s limited description and figure, Platyscelus ovoides is a well-established species in the literature. The type locality is the Mediterranean Sea, near Nice, France. Type species of synonyms. Bate (1861) instituted Platyscelus because Typhis is preoccupied by a genus of molluscs (Monfort 1810). Thus, the type species is as above. The type species of Dithyrus is D. faba Dana, 1853, by subsequent designation. Type material could not be located in any major North American museum and is considered lost (see Evans 1967). Despite the loss of type material it is clear from Dana’s description and figures that D. faba is a species of Platyscelus , most likely P. armatus . The type locality is the north-west Atlantic, off the Canary Islands, from stomach of Bonito, 27 September 1838. The type species of Platyscelus is P. serratus Bate, 1861 by monotypy. Type material could not be found at the NHM or MNHN and is considered lost. The type locality is “unknown. Taken by M. Morrisse of Havre”. However, it is clear from the description and figures of Bate that his species is synonymous with P. ovoides . Thus, there is no problem with accepting Typhis ovoides Risso, 1816 as the type species of the genus. Claus (1879) also designates T. ovoides as the type species of his genus Eutyphis . Diagnosis. Head round. Eyes occupying most of head surface; grouped in two fields on each side of head. Antennae 1 of males with 2-articulate peduncle; flagellum with large, crescent-shaped callynophore, with aesthetascs arranged in two-field brush medially, with three smaller articles inserted on antero-dorsal corner. Antennae 1 of females with 3-articulate peduncle; callynophore narrowly rectangular, with two smaller articles inserted terminally. Antennae 2 of males 5-articulate; strongly zig-zagged, with all articles folded back on each other, extending anteriorly under head and posteriorly between the gnathopoda to pereonite 2; basal article distinctly inflated, about half or less the length of following article; articles 2 & 3 sub-equal in length; terminal two articles of similar length, much shorter than preceding one; terminal article pointing anteriorly. Antennae 2 of females 5-articulate, with very small terminal article. Mandibular incisor relatively broad, straight with several teeth, with small distal lobe medially; in male orientated more or less parallel to palp. Maxillae 1 consisting of elongate plates with few bifid, robust setae, distally on medial margin. Maxillae 2 consisting of curved, pointed plates, with rounded medial bulge. Maxilliped with inner lobes completely fused; medial margin of outer lobes without fringe of setae or membranous fringe. Coxae all separate from pereonites. Gnathopods 1 & 2 chelate; carpal process knife-shaped, armed with prominent teeth. Pereopods 3 & 4 distinctly shorter than pereopods 5 & 6. Pereopod 5; basis very broad, more-or-less oval-shaped, almost almost twice as long as broad; articles 3–7 inserted sub-terminally on basis. Pereopod 6; basis very broad, bean-shaped, with rounded or relatively straight distal margin, maximum width about 0.4 x maximum length, with relatively small fissure; articles 3–7 inserted subterminally on basis; merus with antero-distal corner slightly extended, overlapping carpus medially. Pereopod 7 reduced in size with large, elongate basis; with only 1–3 terminal articles. Uropods 1 & 2 with articulated exopoda and endopoda. Uropod 3; endopod fused with peduncle. Rami of all uropoda more or less lanceolate, usually with serrated margins. Gills all with folds. Species. Platyscelus ovoides (Risso, 1816); P. armatus (Claus, 1879); P. crustulatus (Claus, 1879) and P. serratulus Stebbing, 1888. Sexual dimorphism. The sexes are remarkably similar in general morphology, and except for the antennae and mandibles, there is no obvious sexual dimorphism. Remarks. This genus is distinguished by the distinct serrations found on the carpus and propodus of the gnathopoda. Also, in males, the last two articles of the second antennae are usually much shorter than half the length of the preceding one. However, it differs most significantly from all the other genera in that coxa 7 is not fused with the pereonite. Records of associations with gelatinous plankton are few. Platyscelus ovoides has been recorded with the medusa Aequoria sp. (Risso 1816), and P. serratulus with the siphonophore Agalma elegans (Laval 1980). An unidentified species of Platyscelus has also been found with the medusa Pelagia noctiluca (Laval 1980). Very little is known about the biology of species. Stephensen (1925) and Thurston (1976) provide some limited biogeographical information. Most species seem to prefer tropical waters, and from the available data, appear to be epipelagic in habit. This genus is desperately in need of taxonomic revision. Only four species are currently recognised (Vinogradov et al . 1982). : Published as part of Zeidler, Wolfgang, 2016, A review of the families and genera of the superfamily PLATYSCELOIDEA Bowman & Gruner, 1973 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Hyperiidea), together with keys to the families, genera and species, pp. 1-136 in Zootaxa 4192 (1) on pages 101-104, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4192.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/166420 : {"references": ["Bate, C. S. (1861) On the morphology of some Amphipoda of the Division Hyperina. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 3, 8 (43), 1 - 16, plates 1 - 2.", "Risso, A. (1816) Histoire naturelle des Crustaces des environs de Nice. Librairie Grecque-Latine-Allemande: Paris, 175 pp., 3 plates.", "Guerin, F. E. (1825) Encyclopedie Methodique Histoire Naturelle. Entomologie, ou histoire naturelle des Crustaces, des Arachnides et des Insectes par M. Latreille. Tome 10. Paris.", "Milne-Edwards, H. (1830) Extrait de recherches pour servir a l'histoire naturelle des Crustaces Amphipodes. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 20, 353 - 399, plates 10 - 11.", "Milne-Edwards, H. (1838) Arachnoides, Crustaces. In: Historie Naturelle des Animaux sans Vertebres \u2026 par. J. B. P. A. de Lamarck. Tome V. (Deuxieme Edition. Par M. M. G. P. Deshayes et H. Milne-Edwards). Paris, 1838, 699 pp.", "Lucas. H. (1840) Histoire Naturelle des Crustaces, des Arachnides et des Myriapodes. P. Dumenil, Paris, 600 pp. + 46 plates (inclusive).", "Milne-Edwards, H. (1840) Histoire naturelle des Crustaces, comprenant l'anatomie, la physiologie, et la classification de ces animaux. Tome 3. Paris, 638 pp., plates 1 - 42. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 16170", "Lucas, H. (1846) Les amphipodes. Histoire naturelle des animaux articules, premiere partie Crustaces, Arachnides, Myriapodes et Hexapodes. Exploration scientifique de I'Algerie pendant les annees 1840, 1841, 1842. Paris, pp. 1 - 88, plates 1 - 8.", "Dana, J. D. (1852) On the classification of the Crustacea Choristopoda or Tetradecapoda. American Journal of Sciences and Arts, series 2, 14 (41), 297 - 316.", "Dana, J. D. (1853) Crustacea, Part II. United States Exploring Expedition, 14, 689 - 1618. [Plates 1 - 96 published in 1855]", "Bate, C. S. (1862) Catalogue of the specimens of Amphipodous Crustacea in the collection of the British Museum. British Museum, Natural History, London, 399 pp., plates 1 - 58.", "Thomson, G. M. (1879) New Zealand Crustacea. Tribe III-Amphipoda. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 11, 235 - 248, plate 10.", "Stebbing, T. R. R. (1888) Report on the Amphipoda collected by H. M. S. ' Challenger' during the years 1873 - 1876. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H. M. S. ' Challenger' during the years 1873 - 76. Zoology, 29, i - xxiv & 1 - 1737, plates 1 - 210.", "Spandl, H. (1924 a) Expeditionen S. M. Schiff ' Pola' in das Rote Meer. Nordliche und Sudliche Halfte, 1895 / 96 - 1897 / 98. Zoologische Ergebnisse 35. Die Amphipoden des Roten Meeres. Denckschriften Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 99, 19 - 73.", "Chevreux, E. & Fage, L. (1925) Amphipodes. Faune de France, 9, 488 pp., 438 text Figs", "Schellenberg, A. (1927) Amphipoda des Nordischen Plankton, pp. 589 - 722. In: Nordisches Plankton, Zoologischer Teil. Kiel, Leipzig. Volume 3, 722 pp.", "Spandl, H. (1927) Die Hyperiiden (exkl. Hyperiidea Gammaroidea und Phronimidae) der Deutschen Sudpolar-Expedition 1901 - 1903. Deutsche Sudpolar-Expedition 1901 - 1903, Band 19, Zoologie, 11, 145 - 287, plate 10.", "Hurley, D. E. (1955) Pelagic amphipods of the sub-order Hyperiidea in New Zealand waters. I. Systematics. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 83 (1), 119 - 194.", "Bowman, T. E. & Gruner, H. - E. (1973) The families and genera of Hyperiidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, No. 146, 1 - 64. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 00810282.146", "Zeidler, W. (1978) Hyperiidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from Queensland waters. Australian Journal of Zoology, Supplementary Series, No. 59, 1 - 93. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1071 / AJZS 059", "Vinogradov, M. E., Volkov, A. F. & Semenova, T. N. (1982) Amfipody-Giperiidy (Amphipoda: Hyperiidea) Mirovogo Okeanea. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Opredeliteli po Faune SSSR No. 132. Leningrad, 492 pp. [In Russian, English translation, 1996, Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Washington D. C., D. Siegel-Causey, Scientific Editor].", "Shih, C. - T. & Chen, Q. - C. (1995) Zooplankton of China Seas (2) - The Hyperiidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda). China Ocean Press, Beijing, 295 pp.", "Vinogradov, G. M. (1999) Amphipoda, pp. 1141 - 1240. In: Boltovskoy, D. (Ed.), South Atlantic Zooplankton. Vol. 2. Backhuys, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1705 pp.", "Claus, C. (1879) Die Gattungen und Arten der Platysceliden in Systematischer Ubersicht. Arbeiten aus dem Zoologischen Institut der Universitat zu Wien und der Zoologischen Station Triest, 2, 1 - 52 (147 - 198).", "Claus, C. (1880) Grundzuge der Zoologie. 4 th ed. Marburg.", "Carus, J. V. (1885) Prodromus Faunae Mediterraneae sive Descriptio Animalium Maris Mediterranei incolarum quam comparata silva rerum quatenus innotuit adjectis locis et nominibus vulgaribus eorumque auctoribus in commodum Zoologorum congessit Julius Victor Carus. Vol. I. Pars II. Arthropoda. Stuttgart, 1885.", "Claus, C. (1887) Die Platysceliden. Alfred Holder, Vienna, 77 pp., plates 1 - 25.", "Gerstaecker, A. (1886) Dr. H. G. Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Thierreichs, wissenschaftlich dargestellt in Wort und Bilt. 5 (2). Gliederfussler; Arthropoda. Leipzig und Heidelberg, 1886, pp. 417 - 512.", "Pirlot, J. M. (1929) Resultats zoologiques de la croisiere atlantique de'l'Armauer Hansen' (Mai-Juin 1922). 1. Les Amphipodes Hyperides. Memoires de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, serie 3, 15 (2), 1 - 196.", "Bovallius, C. (1887) Systematical list of the Amphipoda Hyperiidea. Bihang till Kungliga Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, 11 (16), 1 - 50.", "Montfort, P. Denys de (1810) Conchyliologie Systematique, et classification methodique des Coquilles; offrant leurs figures, leur arrangement generique, leurs descriptions caracteristiques, leurs noms; ainsi que leur synonymie en plusieurs langues. Tome Second. Paris: F. Schoell, 1808 - 10, 676 pp.", "Evans, F. (1967) Syntypes of Decapoda described by William Stimpson and James Dana in the collections of the British Museum (Natural History). Journal of Natural History, 1, 399 - 411. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222936700770391", "Laval, P. (1980) Hyperiid amphipods as crustacean parasitoids associated with gelatinous plankton. Oceanography and Marine Biology, Annual Review, 18, 11 - 56.", "Stephensen, K. (1925) Hyperiidea-Amphipoda (Part 3: Lycaeopsidae, Pronoidae, Lycaeidae, Brachyscelidae, Oxycephalidae, Parascelidae, Platyscelidae). Report on the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions 1908 - 10 to the Mediterranean and Adjacent Seas, 2 (Biology - D 5), 151 - 252.", "Thurston, M. H. (1976) The vertical distribution and diurnal migration of the Crustacea Amphipoda collected during the SOND Cruise, 1965. II. The Hyperiidea and general discussion. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 383 - 470. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0025315400018981"]}