Sertularella patagonica d'Orbigny 1842

Sertularella patagonica (d’Orbigny, 1842) Fig. 15 A-E; Table 20 Sertularia patagonica d’Orbigny, 1842: pl. 11 figs 3-5; 1847: 25. – Hartlaub, 1905: 643, figs H4, J4. – Nutting, 1904: 81, pl. 16 fig. 3. Sertularella striata Stechow, 1923b: 10 ( syn. nov. ). – Stechow, 1925: 470, fig. 30. – Millard, 1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Galea, Horia R., Schories, Dirk, Häussermann, Verena, Försterra, Günter
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6029754
https://zenodo.org/record/6029754
Description
Summary:Sertularella patagonica (d’Orbigny, 1842) Fig. 15 A-E; Table 20 Sertularia patagonica d’Orbigny, 1842: pl. 11 figs 3-5; 1847: 25. – Hartlaub, 1905: 643, figs H4, J4. – Nutting, 1904: 81, pl. 16 fig. 3. Sertularella striata Stechow, 1923b: 10 ( syn. nov. ). – Stechow, 1925: 470, fig. 30. – Millard, 1964: 47, fig. 15. – (?) Blanco, 1974: 44, figs 2-8. – Millard, 1975: 304, fig. 97E-F. – Genzano, 1990: 45, figs 11-12. – Blanco, 1994: 201. – Genzano & Zamponi, 2003: 308. non Sertularella striata. – Gili et al ., 1989: 104, fig. 29A. Sertularella mogotesensis El Beshbeeshy, 2011: 20 [new name for both Blanco’s (1967, p. 115) record of Sertularella atlantica Stechow, 1920 and her 1974 record (p. 44) of Sertularella striata Stechow, 1923b; nomen nudum ]. Sertularella atlantica. – Blanco, 1967: 115, pl. 3 figs 8-12, pl. 4 figs 1-4 [non Sertularella atlantica Stechow, 1920: 21, fig. 2A]. Description: Colonies composed of either stolonal hydrothecae or short (up to 11 mm high), erect shoots arising from sinuous, smooth-walled stolon. Cauli thick, monosiphonic, usually unbranched, occasionally sparingly branched (1-3 short, roughly alternate side branches), smooth or with a reduced number (up to 3-4) of basal wrinkles; divided into internodes of varied length, though generally short, by means of rather indistinct, oblique nodes slanting in alternate directions. Proximal end of internodes provided with a couple of spiral twists, distally a hydrotheca. Side branches, when present, arising laterally from below the base of a stem hydrotheca. The latter close to one another, fusiform, free from the corresponding internodes for more than half their adaxial length; walls with 6-8 transverse ridges encircling their whole surface; aperture provided with 4 short, triangular cusps separated by shallow embayments; no submarginal, intrathecal cusps; a 4-flapped operculum. Perisarc thick throughout the colonies. Gonothecae arising from below the hydrothecal bases, broadly ovoid, walls provided with ca . 10 transverse ridges on nearly the whole surface, apically 3-4 minute spines surrounding the aperture, female with acrocysts. Dimensions: See Table 20. Remarks: One of the original illustrations by d’Orbigny (1842, pl. 11 fig. 5) can be misleading when attempting to compare this species with contemporary records from the study area, as the hydrothecae are figured with a decidedly scaly appearance. However, a similar illustration was provided by Hincks (1868) for S. rugosa (Linnaeus, 1758), while recent and more accurate drawings ( e.g. Cornelius, 1995; Schuchert, 2001) show a quite common condition of the hydrothecae, typical of a species with transversely ringed walls. Type material of S. patagonica is likely lost, as no mention of it was made by Van Praët (1979) in his catalogue of the type specimens housed in the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle of Paris, France. The typically short internodes, twisted basally, and the transversely annulated hydrothecae emphasized by d’Orbigny (1847) are characters also noted in Blanco’s (1967, as S. atlantica Stechow, 1920) account, and it is therefore assumed that both hydroids are conspecific. The latter nominal species, however, originates from the northern hemisphere, and is probably a synonym of S. tenella (Alder, 1857) (Picard, 1956; Cornelius, 1995). In a subsequent paper, Blanco (1974) considered her earlier record as conspecific with her newly-obtained material assignable to S. striata Stechow, 1923b. Finally, Blanco (1994) recognized S. striata as a synonym of S. patagonica but, curiously, kept the former as the valid binomen. According to the accounts of both Stechow (1925) and Millard (1964), S. striata exhibits the same morphological characters as S. patagonica , and their respective measurements are highly concordant (see Table 20 herein). For this reason, both nominal species are considered here as coterminous, with d’Orbigny’s hydroid name having priority. The Namibian and South African records by Gili et al . (1989) most probably do not belong here, owing to the large size of the hydrothecae in their material. The morphological similarity between S. patagonica and S. rugosa Linnaeus, 1758 invoked by both Kirchenpauer (1884) and Hartlaub (1901) is only superficial, and resides in particular in the ringed condition of the hydrothecal wall. However, the hydrothecal aperture is conspicuously tilted downwards in the latter species (Cornelius, 1995; Schuchert, 2001), thus differing from the illustrations provided by both d’Orbigny (1842) and Blanco (1967). In addition, both species are certainly distinct on the account of their very remote areas of occurrence. Distribution: Argentina – Provincia de Buenos Aires [off Mar del Plata (Blanco, 1967, as S. atlantica Genzano, 1990, as S. striata )]; Provincia de Río Negro [Ensenada de Ros (d’Orbigny, 1847); Barranca final (Blanco, 1974; 1994, both as S. striata )]. Elsewhere – South Africa (Stechow, 1923b; 1925; Millard, 1964; 1975). : Published as part of Horia R. Galea, Dirk Schories, Verena Häussermann & Günter Försterra, 2017, Taxonomic revision of the genus Sertularella (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) from southern South America and the subantarctic, with descriptions of five new species, pp. 255-321 in Revue suisse de Zoologie 124 (2) on pages 294-295, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.893519 : {"references": ["Hartlaub C. 1905. Die Hydroiden der Magalhaensischen Region und chilenischen Kuste. In: Fauna chilensis. Zoologische Jahrbucher Suppl. 6 (3): 497 - 714.", "Nutting C. C. 1904. American hydroids. Part II. The Sertularidae. Special Bulletin of the United States National Museum 4 (2): 1 - 325.", "Stechow E. 1923 b. Neue Hydroiden der Deutschen Tiefsee- Expedition, nebst Bemerkungen uber einige andre Formen. Zoologischer Anzeiger 56 (1 - 2): 1 - 20.", "Stechow E. 1925. Hydroiden der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee- Expedition auf dem Dampfer \" Valdivia \" 1898 - 1899 27: 383 - 546.", "Millard N. A. H. 1964. The Hydrozoa of the south and west coasts of South Africa. Part II. The Lafoeidae, Syntheciidae and Sertulariidae. Annals of the South African Museum 48 (1): 1 - 56.", "Blanco O. M. 1974. Adicion a los hidrozoos argentinos. Neotropica 20 (61): 43 - 47.", "Millard N. A. H. 1975. Monograph on the Hydroida of southern Africa. Annals of the South African Museum 68: 1 - 513.", "Genzano G. N. 1990. Hidropolipos (Cnidaria) de Mar del Plata. Neritica 5 (1): 35 - 54.", "Blanco O. M. 1994. Enumeracion sistematica y distribucion geografica preliminar de los Hydroida de la Republica Argentina. Suborden Athecata (Gymnoblastea, Anthomedusae), Thecata (Calyptoblastea, Leptomedusae) y Limnomedusae. Revista del Museo La Plata (Zoologia) 14 (161): 181 - 216.", "Genzano G. N., Zamponi M. O. 2003. Hydroid assemblages from Mar del Plata, Argentina, at depths between 0 and 500 m. Distribution and biological substrata. Oceanologica Acta 25: 303 - 313.", "Gili J. M., Vervoort W., Pages F. 1989. Hydroids from the west African coast: Guinea Bissau, Namibia and South Africa. Scientia Marina 53 (1): 67 - 112.", "El Beshbeeshy M. 2011. Thecate hydroids from the Patagonian shelf (Coelenterata, Hydrozoa, Thecata). Edited by G. Jarms. Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg 46: 19 - 233.", "Stechow E. 1920. Neue Ergebnisse auf dem Gebiete der Hydroidenforschung. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft fur Morphologie und Physiologie in Munchen 31: 9 - 45.", "Blanco O. M. 1967. Un nuevo aporte al conocimiento de la fauna hidroide Argentina. Revista del Museo de La Plata 10 (77): 97 - 127.", "Hincks T. 1868. A history of British hydroid zoophytes. John van Voorst, London, 338 pp.", "Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria natura, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata. L. Salvii, Holmiae, 823 pp.", "Cornelius P. F. S. 1995. North-west European thecate hydroids and their medusae. Part 2. Sertulariidae to Campanulariidae. Synopses of the British fauna 50: 1 - 386.", "Schuchert P. 2001. Hydroids of Greenland and Iceland. Meddelelser om GrOnland, Bioscience 53: 1 - 184.", "Van Praet M. 1979. Les types de polypes d'Hydraires conserves au Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris. Bulletin du Museum national d'Histoire naturelle de Paris (4) 1, section A (4): 871 - 940.", "Alder J. 1857. A catalogue of the zoophytes of Northumberland and Durham. Transactions of the Tyneside Naturalists' Field Club 3 (2): 93 - 162.", "Picard J. 1956. Les especes et formes mediterraneennes du genre Sertularella. Vie et Milieu 8 (2): 258 - 266.", "Kirchenpauer G. H. 1884. Nordische Gattungen und Arten von Sertulariden. Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiete der Naturwissenschaften, Hamburg 8 (3): 1 - 54.", "Hartlaub C. 1901. Revision der Sertularella - Arten. Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiete der Naturwissenschaften, Hamburg 16 (2) (1): 1 - 143."]}