Figure 12 in Colonization of the ancient southern oceans by small-sized Phocidae: new evidence from Australia
Figure 12. Size range of extant Monachinae, vs. small-sized Neogene southern phocids (below dashed line). Extant total length values from King (1983); where different values for each sex was availble, the larger sex is shown. Estimated total length of Homiphoca capensis from Churchill et al. (2015)...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Still Image |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300502 https://zenodo.org/record/5300502 |
| Summary: | Figure 12. Size range of extant Monachinae, vs. small-sized Neogene southern phocids (below dashed line). Extant total length values from King (1983); where different values for each sex was availble, the larger sex is shown. Estimated total length of Homiphoca capensis from Churchill et al. (2015) and Australophoca changorum from Valenzuela-Toro et al. (2016). Estimated total length for Kawas benegasorum and NMV P232849 from this study. Light grey indicates monachines, dark grey phocines. Asterix (*) indicates species within, or from the margins of, the Southern Ocean. : Published as part of Rule, James P, Adams, Justin W & Fitzgerald, Erich M G, 2021, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 191 (4) on page 1160, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa075, http://zenodo.org/record/5300479 |
|---|