Lindaspio Blake and Maciolek 1992

Lindaspio Blake and Maciolek, 1992 Diagnosis emend. Gender feminine. Prostomium incised, developed into two frontal lobes or weak horns; caruncle present or absent; occipital tentacle absent. Peristomial wings absent. Notopodia of setigers 2–4 with fascicles of heavy spines. Anterior neuropodial spi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bellan, Gérard, Dauvin, Jean-Claude, Laubier, Lucien
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4653162
https://zenodo.org/record/4653162
Description
Summary:Lindaspio Blake and Maciolek, 1992 Diagnosis emend. Gender feminine. Prostomium incised, developed into two frontal lobes or weak horns; caruncle present or absent; occipital tentacle absent. Peristomial wings absent. Notopodia of setigers 2–4 with fascicles of heavy spines. Anterior neuropodial spines present. Dorsal branchiae from setiger 2; ventral branchiae from an anterior segment, branchiae closely associated with parapodial lamellae, continuing to posterior end. Setiger 1 reduced, with notopodia reduced to single lamellae lacking notosetae; notopodia and neuropodia with capillaries and hooded hooks. Pygidium simple, conical, lacking cirri. Table 3 charts differences between the three species of Lindaspio recognized here. From a morphological point of view, it is rather clear that these three species are very similar, even if we could consider the minute differences are significant. For example, L. dibranchiata and L. sebastiena have in common their width and the number of anterior heavy spines; L. southwardorum and L. sebastiena share the same number of the heavy spines and the level of appearance of the first neuro-hooks. However, differences in depth and geographical location at which L. sebastiena has been collected compared with the two other Lindaspio species are striking, and do not permit synonymy with either of them. Another point to consider is the large and unusual size of the branchiae, chiefly the ventral ones, in Lindaspio species. In a recent paper, Hourdez et al. (1998) observed that polychaetes from hydrothermal vents (alvinellids and polynoids) and from cold seeps (orbiniids) exhibit increased specific gill surface area which could be anatomical and physiological adaptations to hypoxyia. This observation could be applied to spionids such as Lindaspio . Another important point is the felting present on the branchiae of L. sebastiena which could be correlated with the environment, organically enriched in hydrocarbons and barium. Such a felting could represent an analogy with the bacterial accumulation on the posterior part of the body of Alvinella caudata Desbruyères and Laubier, 1986. It is of some interest to recall that L. sebastiena was collected together with an undescribed species of Vesicomyidae, Vesicomyarum sp. (Cosel and Salas, in preparation), and that various Vesicomyids are associated with symbiotic sulpho-oxidizing bacteria. : Published as part of Bellan, Gérard, Dauvin, Jean-Claude & Laubier, Lucien, 2003, The genus Lindaspio (Annelida: Polychaeta: Spionidae), and a new species from an oil field off Congo, western Africa, pp. 2413-2424 in Journal of Natural History 37 (20) on pages 2420-2423, DOI: 10.1080/00222930210155666, http://zenodo.org/record/4653292 : {"references": ["BLAKE, J. A. and MACIOLEK, N. J., 1992, Polychaeta from deep-sea hydrothermal vents in the eastern Pacific. III. A new Genus and two new Species of Spionidae from the Guaymas Basin and Juan de Fuca Ridge with comments on a related species from the Western North Atlantic, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 105 (4), 723 - 732.", "HOURDEZ, S., WEBER, R. E., LALLIER, F. H. and FISHER, C. R., 1998, Adaptations to chronic hypoxia from hydrothermal vents and cold-seeps, American Zoologist, 38, 161 A.", "DESBRUYERES, D. and LAUBIER, L., 1986, Les Alvinellidae, une famille nouvelle d'annelides polychetes infeodees aux sources hydrothermales sous-marines: systematique, biologie et ecologie, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 64 (10), 2227 - 2245."]}