Ischyrocerini Kroyer 1838

Key to genera of the Ischyrocerini 1 Urosome 1 bearing 3 dorsal teeth or cusps (Fig. 35a).................................. Bathyphotis Stephensen, 1944 – Urosome 1 without dorsal teeth although there may be a pair of short setae (Fig. 35b)............................... 2 2 Pereopods 5–7, ischium p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Conlan, Kathleen E.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4534340
https://zenodo.org/record/4534340
Description
Summary:Key to genera of the Ischyrocerini 1 Urosome 1 bearing 3 dorsal teeth or cusps (Fig. 35a).................................. Bathyphotis Stephensen, 1944 – Urosome 1 without dorsal teeth although there may be a pair of short setae (Fig. 35b)............................... 2 2 Pereopods 5–7, ischium posteriorly winged (Fig. 35c). Uropod 3 uniramous, ramus ending in a cluster of spines (Fig. 35e).................................................................................. Alatajassa Conlan, 2007 – Pereopods 5–7, ischium not posteriorly winged (Fig. 35d). Uropod 3 biramous (Fig. 35f)...............................3 3 Pereopods 3–4, propodus prehensile (Fig. 35g)......................................... Isaeopsis K.H. Barnard, 1916 – Pereopods 3–4, propodus rectangular or oval and not expanded distally (Fig. 35h).....................................4 4 Coxa 4 posteriorly excavate (Fig. 35i)........................................................................5 – Coxa 4 not posteriorly excavate (though it may be shallowly concave) (Fig. 35j)......................................7 5 Gnathopod 1, carpus longer than the propodus (carpus:propodus length ~125%). Gnathopod 2, female, propodus massive, length ~175% the length of the propodus of gnathopod 1, palm toothed (Fig. 35k)............. Veronajassa Vader and Myers, 1996 – Gnathopod 1, carpus subequal to or shorter than the propodus (carpus: propodus length ~45–95%). Gnathopod 2, female, propodus not massive, length ~125% the length of the propodus of gnathopod 1, palm not toothed (Fig. 35l)....................6 6 Eyes absent. Maxilla 1, inner plate with a long apical seta (Fig. 36a). Coxa 1 more than half the depth of coxae 2–4. Gnathopod 1, carpus length ~95% the length of the propodus; propodus, palm shallowly excavate (Figs 36c, d)................................................................................................. Myersius Souza-Filho & Serejo, 2014 – Eyes present. Maxilla 1, inner plate without a long apical seta (Fig. 36b). Coxa 1 ± half the depth of coxae 2–4. Gnathopod 1, carpus length ~45–50% the length of the propodus; propodus, palm convex (Figs 36e, f)........... Microjassa Stebbing, 1899 7 Gnathopod 1, carpus ~100% the length of the propodus. Pereopods 3 and 4, dactyl ~175% the length of the propodus (Fig. 36g)................................................................................ Scutischyrocerus Myers, 1995 – Gnathopod 1, carpus shorter than the propodus. Pereopods 3 and 4, dactyl ±90% the length of the propodus (Fig. 36h)........8 8 Uropod 3 with a cluster of distolateral setae beside the outer ramus (Fig. 36i). Jassa group..............................9 – Uropod 3 without a cluster of distolateral setae beside the outer ramus Fig. 36j)......................................13 9 Antenna 1, accessory flagellum absent or scale-like (Fig. 37a)................................ Parajassa Stebbing, 1899 – Antenna 1, accessory flagellum 2 articles, the second minute (Fig. 37b)............................................10 10 Gnathopods and pereopods 3–4 clothed in abundant, long plumose setae (Fig. 3). Gnathopod 2, either sex, propodus, palm bearing a central tooth and a second tooth at the palmar angle, with or without a single large spine at the palmar angle (Fig. 37c)............................................................................................. Plumulojassa n. gen. – Gnathopods and pereopods 3–4, setae simple or finely pectinate except in the palm of the male gnathopod 2 where the setae may be plumose (Figs 17, 22, 25 and 27– 29). Gnathopod 2, either sex, propodus, palm sinuous, concave or with a pronounced thumb defining the palm proximally, spines if present grouped in triplicate or if single, very small (Figs 37 d–f)..................11 11 Gnathopods 1 and 2, propodus, palm defined by 1 spine. Gnathopod 2 without a gill. Pereopod 5, carpus with a cluster of spines posterodistally. Pleopods, rami very short, length ± depth of the pleon (Figs 22–28)....................... Pleojassa n. gen. – Gnathopods 1 and 2, propodus, palm defined by multiple spines (usually 3–4). Gnathopod 2 with a gill. Pereopod 5, carpus not spinose posterodistally. Pleopods, rami long, length> depth of the pleon (Fig. 17)....................................12 12 Gnathopod 2, propodus, both sexes producing a thumb at adulthood, palmar defining spines, if present, at the thumb tip (Fig. 37e), juvenile palm sinuous, without a thumb; pereopods 3 and 4, carpus <25% overlapped by the merus; uropod 3, outer ramus with many minute cusps proximal of the dorsally recurved terminal spine but without additional larger cusps (Figs 17–21)............................................................................................. Hemijassa Walker, 1907 – Gnathopod 2, propodus, only the male producing a thumb at adulthood, palmar defining spines, if present, proximal of the thumb tip (Fig. 37f), juvenile palm concave or sinuous, without a thumb; pereopods 3 and 4, carpus 80–100% overlapped by the merus; uropod 3, outer ramus with 2 (usually) larger cusps in addition to minute cusps proximal of the dorsally recurved terminal spine (Figs 35b,d,f,h, 36 h,i and 37f)................................................................ Jassa Leach, 1814 13 Uropods 1, 2 and/or 3, peduncle with lateral row of setae (Fig. 37g)..................... Ruffojassa Vader and Myers, 19961 – Uropods 1, 2 and/or 3, peduncle without a lateral row of setae...................................................14 14 Antenna 1, accessory flagellum 3–4 articles, the last minute. Uropod 3, outer ramus with one to several medial setae projecting dorsally (Fig. 37h)................................................................ Ventojassa J. L. Barnard, 1970 – Antenna 1, accessory flagellum 1–2 articles, the last minute. Uropod 3, outer ramus without medial setae projecting dorsally.........................................................................................................15 15 Gnathopod 1, carpus longer than the propodus (carpus ~120% of the propodus length). Known only from subantarctic islands and Brazil, 44–1058 m......................................................... Pseudischyrocerus Schellenberg, 1931 – Gnathopod 1, carpus shorter than the propodus (carpus ~50–95% of the propodus length). Various locations and depths......16 16 Mandibular palp, article 3 slender, ventrally convex and broadest centrally, tip acute (Fig. 37i). Antennae 1 and 2, length Ξ85% of the body length (headlobe to end of uropods), antenna 2 not stouter than antenna 1. Pereopods 3 and 4, merus not overlapping the carpus anteriorly. Uropod 2, outer ramus, length 65% of the inner ramus....................... Paradryope Stebbing, 18882 – Mandibular palp, article 3 broad distally, end rounded (Fig. 37j). Antennae 1 and 2, length ±65% of the body length (headlobe to end of uropods), antenna 2 stouter than or similar to antenna 1. Pereopods 3 and 4, merus overlapping 10–100% of the carpus. Uropod 2, outer ramus, length 75–80% of the inner ramus.......................................................17 17 Adult male gnathopod 2 grossly lengthened and pendulate, length 190–350% of the length of gnathopod 1, propodus slender, length 180–400% of its width at the centre, dactyl 50–100% of the length of the propodus (Figs 38 a-c). Uropod 3 with 1–2 rows of mid-dorsal spines but without a corona of multiple spines on the distal margin (Fig. 38d). Warm temperate and tropical, Northern and Southern Hemisphere, known from 9– 40°N and 5– 34°S, 0–16 m depth................... Neoischyrocerus Conlan, 1995 – Adult male gnathopod 2 variable in length but not pendulate, length 100–220% of the length of gnathopod 1, propodus variably slender or stout, length 120–290% of its width at the centre, dactyl 33–75% of the length of the propodus (Figs 38 e-g). Uropod 3 with 1–2 rows of mid-dorsal spines and a corona of numerous spines on the distal margin 3 (Fig. 38h). Cold temperate and polar, primarily Northern Hemisphere, known from 36– 81°N and 42°S, 1–2000 m depth............... Ischyrocerus Krøyer, 1838 : Published as part of Conlan, Kathleen E., 2021, New genera for species of Jassa Leach (Crustacea: Amphipoda) and their relationship to a revised Ischyrocerini, pp. 1-72 in Zootaxa 4921 (1) on pages 61-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4921.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4496015 : {"references": ["Stephensen, K. (1944) Crustacea Malacostraca. VIII. (Amphipoda IV). Danish Ingolf Expedition, 3 (13), 1 - 51.", "Conlan, K. E. (2007) Alatajassa (Amphipoda, Corophiidea), a new genus from the Pacific coast of North America. Crustaceana, 2007, 1339 - 1354. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854007782605574", "Barnard, K. H. (1916) Contributions to the crustacean fauna of South Africa. 5. The Amphipoda. Annals of the South African Museum, 15 (3), 105 - 302. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 10646", "Vader, W. & Myers, A. A. (1996) Amphipods living in association with hermit crabs in SE Australia. I. Five new Ischyroceridae. Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, 20, 263 - 292.", "Souza-Filho, J. F. & Serejo, C. S. (2014) On the phylogeny of Ischyroceridae (Amphipoda, Senticaudata, Corophiida), with the description of a new genus and eight new species from deep-sea Brazilian waters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 170, 34 - 85. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / zoj. 12099", "Stebbing, T. R. R. (1899) Revision of Amphipoda (continued). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 4 (21), 205 - 211. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222939908678185", "Myers, A. A. (1995) The Amphipoda (Crustacea) of Madang Lagoon: Aoridae, Isaeidae, Ischyroceridae and Neomegamphopidae. Records of the Australian Museum Supplement, 22, 25 - 95. https: // doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0812 - 7387.22.1995.121", "Walker, A. O. (1907) Crustacea. III. Amphipoda. National Antartic Expedition 1901 - 1904. Natural History 3, 1 - 39.", "Leach, W. E. (1814) Crustaceology. Edinburgh Encyclopaedia, 7, 385 - 437.", "Barnard, J. L. (1970) Sublittoral Gammaridea (Amphipoda) of the Hawaiian Islands. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 34, 1 - 286. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 00810282.34", "Schellenberg, A. (1931) Gammariden und Caprelliden des Magellangebietes, Sudgeorgiens und der Westantarktis. Further Zoological Results of the Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901 - 1903, 2 (6), 1 - 290.", "Conlan, K. E. (1995) Thumbing doesn't always make the genus: revision of Microjassa Stebbing (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Ischyroceridae). Bulletin of Marine Science, 57, 333 - 377.", "Kroyer, H. (1838) Gronlands amfipoder beskrevne af Henrick Kroyer. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Naturvidenskabelige og Mathematiske Afhandlinger, 7, 229 - 326. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 13747"]}