Neoischyrocerus Conlan, 2021, n. comb.
Genus Neoischyrocerus n. comb. Supplementary Table S3 Type species. N. claustris J.L. Barnard, 1969 Diagnosis. (with differences from Ischyrocerus in bold). Body length at maturity 1–2 mm (usually), rarely 4–6 mm. Tropical and warm temperate distribution, collected from algae, sponges, corals or fro...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4534334 https://zenodo.org/record/4534334 |
| Summary: | Genus Neoischyrocerus n. comb. Supplementary Table S3 Type species. N. claustris J.L. Barnard, 1969 Diagnosis. (with differences from Ischyrocerus in bold). Body length at maturity 1–2 mm (usually), rarely 4–6 mm. Tropical and warm temperate distribution, collected from algae, sponges, corals or from a spiny lobster, 0–16 m, 9– 40°N and 5– 34°S. Pereon : dorsally smooth (most species), ridged or carinate (some species). Antenna 1 : accessory flagellum 2 articles (second minute), projecting forward or flush with the flagellum; antennae 1 and 2 peduncles subequal in width or antenna 2, 10% wider (based on comparison of antenna 1 peduncle article 2 with antenna 2 peduncle article 4), peduncular setae and setal pattern similar to antenna 1, or slightly shorter, not plumose. Gnathopod 2, adult male : 190–350% the length of gnathopod 1, basis and propodus especially elongate coxa 1, 60–110% the depth of coxa 2; basis concave or sinuous ischium anteriorly rounded; propodus often slender (posterior length 180–400% of central width), palm nearly the full length of the propodus, often with a bulge or tooth defining it proximally at the junction of the carpus (sometimes palm continuous with the carpus), sometimes centrally toothed instead and with shallow bulge or teeth at the junction of the dactyl dactyl half or nearly the full length of the propodus. Gnathopod 2, juvenile male : shorter than the adult male gnathopod 2, palm bearing 1–2 strong spines about midway along the length of the propodus, dactyl ending at the spines. Gnathopod 2, female : only slightly larger than gnathopod 1, palm of the propodus convex (usually) or shallowly concave (rarely). Pereopods 3 and 4 : propodus, posterior margin bearing spines or setae coxa 4, posterior margin straight, not shallowly concave. Pereopod 5, male : similar to but shorter than pereopods 6 and 7 or variously modified with posteriorly concave basis or posteriorly expanded and spinose merus. Uropod 1 : peduncle with short ventrodistal spinous process underlying the rami, length ~15–35% of the outer ramus length. Uropod 3 : peduncle bearing 1–2 rows of spines dorsally, ending in a single spine at the distal margin, but without a corona of spines around the margin or setae; rami without spines mid-dorsally , outer ramus subequal to or shorter than the inner and bearing 3–8 minute dorsal cusps apically, without (rarely with) a small apical straight spine . Component species (with transferred species in bold). Ischyrocerus longimanus (Haswell, 1879) (Australia); I. parvus Stout, 1913 (California); I. carinatus K.H. Barnard, 1916 (South Africa); I. gorgoniae K.H. Barnard, 1940 (South Africa); I. ctenophorus Schellenberg, 1953 (South Africa); Coxischyrocerus inexpectatus (Ruffo, 1959) (Mediterranean, Red Sea?); N. claustris J.L. Barnard, 1969 (California); N. lilipuna J.L. Barnard, 1970 (Hawaii); I. oahu J.L. Barnard, 1970 (Hawaii); I. oahu oahu J.L. Barnard, 1970 (Hawaii); N. chinipa J.L. Barnard, 1979 (Galapagos Islands and Panama); I. oahu armatus Ledoyer, 1979 (Madagascar); Tropischyrocerus socia (Myers, 1989) (Bora Bora); I. mediodens Myers, 1995 (Papua New Guinea); I. parma Myers, 1995 (Papua New Guinea); I. apiensis Myers, 1997 (Samoa); N. vidali Ortiz & Lalana, 2002 (Cuba); C. rhombocoxus Just, 2009 (Australia); T. pugilus Just, 2009 (Australia). Remarks. Species of Ischyrocerus were transferred to Neoischyrocerus if they demonstrated at least one key character (grossly enlarged and pendulous male gnathopod 2 similar in shape to that of others in the genus; dactyls with comb-like striae as noted in J.L. Barnard (1970), Conlan (1995) and Ortiz & Lalana (2002); similar spination on uropod 3). Presence or absence of these striae were not mentioned by other authors, therefore questioning as to whether this character had been looked for. Mouthpart characteristics were not widely described, but may be useful for generic definition, especially the clavate vs slenderer shape of the mandibular palp and the presence/absence of a long apical seta on the maxilla 1 inner plate. Excluded but uncertain generic status . Ischyrocerus kapu J.L. Barnard, 1970 from Hawaii. The author based the generic assignment on a single male specimen. He noted its resemblance to N. lilipuna but also considered that it should be in a new genus. On balance, though, he assigned it to Ischyrocerus but noted that this was based on limited information because the specimen lacked antennae and pereopods and the female was also unknown. The male’s gnathopod 2 is unusual in having a long conical extension of the merus underneath the propodus, a feature that is not known for either Ischyrocerus or Neoischyrocerus . Myers (1995) stated that I. kapu is congeneric with other species being transferred to Neoischyrocerus . The male’s propodus is wider than in other members of Neoischyrocerus , but its uropod 3 resembles other species of Neoischyrocerus rather than Ischyrocerus . Further material demonstrating the species’ complete morphology is required before it can be confidently transferred to Neoischyrocerus or to a new genus. Genus Ischyrocerus n. comb. Supplementary Table S4 Type species. Ischyrocerus anguipes Krøyer, 1838 Diagnosis (with differences from Neoischyrocerus in bold). Body length at maturity 2–18 mm , though most species are> 5 mm long at adulthood. Primarily known from the Northern Hemisphere in cold temperate to polar waters from 32°N (La Jolla, California; J.L. Barnard 1969) to 81°N in the Arctic Ocean (Stephensen 1944), collected from algae, hydroids, crabs or substrate unknown, 1 to ~ 2000 m. Widely known in Europe but not in the Southern Hemisphere, although one species was found at 42°S off of Chile (J.L. Barnard 1964). Pereon : dorsally smooth (most species), ridged or carinate (some species). Antenna 1 : accessory flagellum 2 articles (second minute), flush with the flagellum or rarely projecting forward; antenna 2 peduncle article 4, 115–170% wider than antenna 1 peduncle article 2 (or rarely equal width), setae and setal pattern similar to antenna 1 or setae shorter, occasionally plumose. Gnathopod 2, adult male : 100–220% the length of gnathopod 1, basis usually not especially elongate, propodus elongate and slender or short and broad (rarely similar to gnathopod 1) coxa 1 70–140% the depth of coxa 2; basis concave or straight ischium anteriorly rounded or straight; propodus variably shaped, slender or broad (posterior length 120–290% of central width), palm only on the distal portion of the propodus or nearly the full length of the propodus, without a bulge or tooth defining it proximally at the junction of the carpus, palm variously toothed dactyl 33–75% the length of the propodus. Gnathopod 2, juvenile male : shorter than the adult male gnathopod 2, palm bearing 1–2 strong spines about midway along the length of the propodus, dactyl ending at the spines. Gnathopod 2, female : only slightly larger than gnathopod 1, palm of the propodus convex or concave. Pereopods 3 and 4 : propodus, posterior margin bearing setae but not spines; c oxa 4, posterior margin straight to shallowly concave. Pereopod 5, male : similar to but shorter than pereopods 6 and 7 or basis posteriorly concave; merus not differing. Uropod 1 : peduncle with short ventrodistal spinous process underlying the rami, length ~25–50% of the outer ramus length. Uropod 3 : peduncle bearing 0–2 rows of spines dorsally, ending in a corona of spines at the distal margin ( rarely a single seta or single spine) rami with 0–1 spines (outer), 0–4 spines (inner), outer ramus subequal to a third shorter than the inner and bearing 0–9 cusps, occasionally with 1–2 apical spines that are straight or dorsally recurved . Component species. Ischyrocerus anguipes Krøyer, 1838 (N. Europe and Arctic Ocean); I. latipes Krøyer, 1842 (Arctic Ocean); I. minutus Liljeborg, 1851 (N. Europe); I. megacheir (Boeck, 1871) (40°N– 80°N, Atlantic to Arctic Ocean); I. brevicornis (Sars, 1879) (E. Greenland, Arctic Ocean); I. tuberculatus (Hoek, 1882) (Barents Sea, 71°N– 77°N); I. tenuicornis (Sars, 1885) (N. Europe); I. nanoides (Hansen, 1887) (Arctic, Baffin Bay and W Greenland, 61°N – 81°N); I. megalops Sars, 1894 (N. Europe); I. commensalis Chevreux, 1900 (E. Atlantic Canada and Saguenay Fjord); I. brusilovi Gurjanova, 1933 (Russian waters); I. enigmaticus Gurjanova, 1934 (Kara Sea, 78°58ʹN); I. cristatus Gurjanova, 1938 (Sea of Japan); I. elongatus Gurjanova, 1938 (Sea of Japan); I. rhodomelae Gurjanova, 1938 (Sea of Japan); I. serratus Gurjanova, 1938 (Sea of Japan); I. hanseni Stephensen, 1944 (64°N, between Iceland and Greenland); I. albanovi Gurjanova, 1946 (Arctic Ocean); I. laptevi Gurjanova, 1946 (Arctic Ocean); I. chamissoi Gurjanova, 1951 (Russian waters); I. dezhnevi Gurjanova, 1951 (Russian waters); I. krascheninnikovi Gurjanova, 1951 (Russian waters); I. stephenseni Gurjanova, 1951 (Russian waters); I. pelagops J.L. Barnard, 1962 (California); I. hortator J.L. Barnard, 1964 (off Chile); I. malacus J.L. Barnard, 1964 (California); I. gurjanovae Kudrjaschov, 1975 (Kurile Islands); I. tzvetkovae Kudrjaschov, 1975 (Kurile Islands); I. fractus King & Holmes, 2004 (Ireland). Remarks. Species were retained in Ischyrocerus if they lacked the key characters noted above for Neoischyrocerus in the appearance of the male gnathopod 2, pereopod dactyls or uropod 3 spination pattern. Ischyrocerus fractus is the only species known in this genus where the male’s gnathopod 2 propodus is very little different from the female’s. It is also the smallest known at adulthood for this genus (2 mm). Excluded, but uncertain generic status. Ischyrocerus camptonyx Thurston, 1974b from subantarctic Signy Island is not Ischyrocerus . It is possibly an undescribed species of Jassa or synonymous with J. alonsoae , in which case Thurston’s name would take precedence. Jassa thurstoni Conlan, 1990 (called J. falcata form 2 by Thurston) and Pleojassa moorei n. sp. (called J. falcata form 3) are also known from Thurston’s collections there. For I. camptonyx , hallmarks of the genus Jassa, rather than Ischyrocerus are the spines at the tip of the antenna 2, the sinuous palmed gnathopod 2, the strong overlap of the merus over the carpus on pereopods 3 and 4, the typical Jassa -like uropod 3 with long peduncle lacking mid-dorsal spines (but with a corona of spines around the distal margin), a lateral setal brush and the strong hooked spines at the tip of the outer ramus, and the telson with a long seta at each corner rather than a spine. However, Thurston describes the uropod outer ramus “with three stout hooked spines dorsally near apex and a minute comb with five-six teeth laterally”, which does not correspond to his illustration and are not Jassa -like. Possibly, though, his description could be interpreted differently. One of the three spines may be the apically immersed, dorsally recurved spine typical of Jassa , the other two spines are cusps, and the five–six teeth are minute dorsal cusps proximal to the two large ones. If so, then this also speaks of I. camptonyx as being a Jassa , either its own species or synonymous with J. alonsoae . It is not a Pleojassa , even though the male’s second-gnathopod resembles that of P. moorei , because this genus lacks a gill on gnathopod 2 while I. camptonyx possesses one. Thurston considered that the few males available for study were juvenile because they all lacked a thumb as in Jassa . However, some of these specimens were larger than the adult, ovigerous females. The female allotype was 4.5 mm and the male holotype was 5.5 mm. This suggests that the male holotype is actually an adult that will not produce a thumb, in which case it is not Jassa . Therefore, until the range of variation can be assessed in Thurston’s specimens, this species should remain in Ischyrocerus with a question as to its proper generic placement. Uncertain status of Ischyrocerus anguipes in the Southern Hemisphere. Sars’ (1894) excellent illustrations of I. anguipes may have resulted in some mis-identifications by early workers in the Southern Hemisphere. Alternatively, their identifications were correct and I. anguipes was being introduced by shipping if the specimens came from ports. K.H. Barnard’s (1916) “ I. anguipes ” could have been a species of Neoischyrocerus , however, as the specimens were 3 mm and the male’s second gnathopod propodus was 3.5 x longer than wide with the dactyl nearly the full length of the propodus, which is typical of adult male Neoischyrocerus. Schellenberg’s (1953) “ I. anguipes ” from L̹deritzbucht, Namibia was a 4.8 mm male which he stated differed from K.H. Barnard’s (1916) “ I. anguipes ” in its gnathopod 2 morphology. “The metacarpus of the 2nd gnathopod is shaped in the same way but stronger and exhibits a spination like on the first gnathopod. The palm is evenly finely corrugated (or: “wavy”) along its almost entire length.” ( Der fast gleich geformte, aber stärkere Metacarpus des 2. Gnathopoden zeigt die Bestachelung wie am 1. Gnathopoden. Die Palma ist fast in ihrer ganzen Länge gleichmässig fein gewellt .) (translated from German to English by Jan Beermann, Alfred Wegener Institute, Bremerhaven, Germany). The similarly shaped gnathopods 1 and 2 suggest that this specimen was a female or juvenile, or an adult male of a different species, as adult male I. anguipes have a gnathopod 2 that is more than twice the length of gnathopod 1, with a concave, rather than convex palm. Schellenberg illustrated the uropod 3 outer ramus as 5-cusped, terminating in a basally immersed, dorsally recurved spine similar to Jassa . The corona of spines at the peduncle’s distal margin is typical of Ischyrocerus and Jassa . “ I. anguipes ” captured off the coast of Ceylon in ~ 150 m depth were briefly described by Walker (1904) but not illustrated. One male and one ovigerous female were 2.5 mm long. The male’s gnathopod 2 was similar to that of I. anguipes , but this could also be Neoischyrocerus which has similarly shaped, though more pendulous second gnathopods with the dactyl in the largest males nearly the full length of the propodus. Chilton (1921) described “ I anguipes ” from Lyttelton, New Zealand which were up to 6 mm long, saying that they closely resembled Sars’ (1894) illustrations of that species. His description was minimal, however, and he provided no illustrations. Genus Ischyrocerus n. comb. Supplementary Table S4 Type species. Ischyrocerus anguipes Krøyer, 1838 Diagnosis (with differences from Neoischyrocerus in bold). Body length at maturity 2–18 mm , though most species are> 5 mm long at adulthood. Primarily known from the Northern Hemisphere in cold temperate to polar waters from 32°N (La Jolla, California; J.L. Barnard 1969) to 81°N in the Arctic Ocean (Stephensen 1944), collected from algae, hydroids, crabs or substrate unknown, 1 to ~ 2000 m. Widely known in Europe but not in the Southern Hemisphere, although one species was found at 42°S off of Chile (J.L. Barnard 1964). Pereon : dorsally smooth (most species), ridged or carinate (some species). Antenna 1 : accessory flagellum 2 articles (second minute), flush with the flagellum or rarely projecting forward; antenna 2 peduncle article 4, 115–170% wider than antenna 1 peduncle article 2 (or rarely equal width), setae and setal pattern similar to antenna 1 or setae shorter, occasionally plumose. Gnathopod 2, adult male : 100–220% the length of gnathopod 1, basis usually not especially elongate, propodus elongate and slender or short and broad (rarely similar to gnathopod 1) coxa 1 70–140% the depth of coxa 2; basis concave or straight ischium anteriorly rounded or straight; propodus variably shaped, slender or broad (posterior length 120–290% of central width), palm only on the distal portion of the propodus or nearly the full length of the propodus, without a bulge or tooth defining it proximally at the junction of the carpus, palm variously toothed dactyl 33–75% the length of the propodus. Gnathopod 2, juvenile male : shorter than the adult male gnathopod 2, palm bearing 1–2 strong spines about midway along the length of the propodus, dactyl ending at the spines. Gnathopod 2, female : only slightly larger than gnathopod 1, palm of the propodus convex or concave. Pereopods 3 and 4 : propodus, posterior margin bearing setae but not spines; c oxa 4, posterior margin straight to shallowly concave. Pereopod 5, male : similar to but shorter than pereopods 6 and 7 or basis posteriorly concave; merus not differing. Uropod 1 : peduncle with short ventrodistal spinous process underlying the rami, length ~25–50% of the outer ramus length. Uropod 3 : peduncle bearing 0–2 rows of spines dorsally, ending in a corona of spines at the distal margin ( rarely a single seta or single spine) rami with 0–1 spines (outer), 0–4 spines (inner), outer ramus subequal to a third shorter than the inner and bearing 0–9 cusps, occasionally with 1–2 apical spines that are straight or dorsally recurved . Component species. Ischyrocerus anguipes Krøyer, 1838 (N. Europe and Arctic Ocean); I. latipes Krøyer, 1842 (Arctic Ocean); I. minutus Liljeborg, 1851 (N. Europe); I. megacheir (Boeck, 1871) (40°N– 80°N : Published as part of Conlan, Kathleen E., 2021, New genera for species of Jassa Leach (Crustacea: Amphipoda) and their relationship to a revised Ischyrocerini, pp. 1-72 in Zootaxa 4921 (1) on pages 58-61, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4921.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4496015 : {"references": ["Barnard, J. L. (1969) Gammaridean Amphipoda of the rocky intertidal of California: Monterey Bay to La Jolla. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 258, 1 - 230. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 03629236.258.1", "Haswell, W. A. (1879) On some additional new genera and species of amphipodous crustaceans. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 4, 319 - 350. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. part. 22854", "Stout, V. R. (1913) Studies in Laguna Amphipoda. Zoologische Jahrbucher. Abteilung fur Systematik, Okologie und Geographie der Tiere, 34, 633 - 659. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. part. 19898", "Barnard, K. H. (1916) Contributions to the crustacean fauna of South Africa. 5. The Amphipoda. Annals of the South African Museum, 15 (3), 105 - 302. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 10646", "Barnard, K. H. (1940) Contributions to the crustacean fauna of South Africa. 12. Further additions to the Tanaidacea, Isopoda and Amphipoda, together with keys for the identification of hitherto recorded marine and fresh-water species. Annals of the South African Museum, 32, 381 - 543.", "Schellenberg A. (1953) Erganzungen zur Amphipodenfauna Sudwest-Afrikas nebst Bemerkungen uber Brutraumbildung. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum f \u02be r Naturkunde in Berlin. Zoologisches Museum und Institut f \u02be r Spezielle (Berlin), 29 (1), 107 - 126. https: // doi. org / 10.1002 / mmnz. 19530290105", "Ruffo, S. (1959) Contributo alla conoscenza degli anfipodi delle grotte sottomarine. Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli, 30 (Supplemento), 402 - 416", "Barnard, J. L. (1970) Sublittoral Gammaridea (Amphipoda) of the Hawaiian Islands. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 34, 1 - 286. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 00810282.34", "Barnard, J. L. (1979) Littoral gammaridean Amphipoda from the Gulf of California and the Galapagos Islands. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 271, 1 - 149. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 00810282.271", "Ledoyer, M. (1979) Les gammariens de la pente externe du Grand Recif de Tulear (Madagascar) (Crustacea Amphipoda). Memoir Del Museo Civico Di Storia Naturale Di Verona, IIa Serie, Sezione Scienze Della Vita, 2, 1 - 149.", "Myers, A. A. (1989) Family Ischyroceridae. In: Ruffo, S. (Ed.), The Amphipoda of the Mediterranean. Part 2. Gammaridea (Haustoriidae to Lysianassidae). Memoires de l'Institut oceanographique, Monaco. No. 13. Musee Oceanographique, Monaco, pp. 432 - 438.", "Myers, A. A. (1995) The Amphipoda (Crustacea) of Madang Lagoon: Aoridae, Isaeidae, Ischyroceridae and Neomegamphopidae. Records of the Australian Museum Supplement, 22, 25 - 95. https: // doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0812 - 7387.22.1995.121", "Myers, A. A. (1997) Amphipoda from the South Pacific: Western Samoa. Records-Australian Museum, 49, 99 - 109. https: // doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0067 - 1975.49.1997.1260", "Ortiz, M. & Lalana, R. (2002) Primer registro para el Mar Caribe y el Archipielago Cubano del genero Neoischyrocerus (Am- phipoda, Ischyroceridae), con la descripcion de una nueva especie de Cuba. Avicennia, 15, 37 - 42.", "Just, J. (2009) Ischyroceridae. Zootaxa, 2260 (1), 463 - 486. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 2260.1.27", "Conlan, K. E. (1995) Thumbing doesn't always make the genus: revision of Microjassa Stebbing (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Ischyroceridae). Bulletin of Marine Science, 57, 333 - 377.", "Kroyer, H. (1838) Gronlands amfipoder beskrevne af Henrick Kroyer. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Naturvidenskabelige og Mathematiske Afhandlinger, 7, 229 - 326. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 13747", "Stephensen, K. (1944) Crustacea Malacostraca. VIII. (Amphipoda IV). Danish Ingolf Expedition, 3 (13), 1 - 51.", "Barnard, J. L. (1964) Some bathyal Pacific Amphipoda collected by the USS Albatross. Pacific Science, 18, 315 - 335.", "Kroyer, H. (1842) Nye nordiske slaegter og arter af amfipodernes orden, henhorende til familien Gammarina. (Forelobigt uddrag af et storre arbejde). Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift, 4, 141 - 166.", "Liljeborg, W. (1851) Bidrag till Norra Rysslands och Norriges fauna, samlade under en vetenskaplig resa i dessa lander 1848. Kongliga Svenska vetenskaps-akademiens handlingar, 1850, 233 - 341.", "Boeck A. (1871) Bidrag til Californiens amphipodefauna. Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-Selskabet i Christiana, 1871, 32 - 51.", "Sars, G. O. (1879) Crustacea et Pycnogonida nova in itinere 2 do et 3 tio expeditionis Norvegicae anno 1877 & 78 collecta (prodromus descriptionis). Archiv for Mathematik og Naturvidenskab. 4, 427 - 476.", "Hoek P. P. C. (1882) Die Crustaceen gesammelt waehrend der Fahrten des \" Willem Barents \" in den Jahren 1878 und 1879. Niederlandisches Archiv f \u02be r Zoologie, Supplementbind, 1 (7), 1 - 75.", "Sars, G. O. (1885) Den Norske Nordhavs-expedition, 1876 - 1878. Zoologi, Crustacea I, Bind 6, 1 - 276.", "Hansen H. J. (1887) Malacostraca marine Groenlandiae occidentalis. Oversigt over det vestlige Gronlands fauna of malakostrake havkrebsdyr Videnskabelige. Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening I Kobenhavn, 4 (9), 5 - 217. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 16332", "Sars, G. O. (1894) Amphipoda. Part XXVII & XXVIII. Podoceridae (concluded), Corophiidae, Cheluridae. An account of the Crustacea of Norway, with short descriptions and figures of all the species, 1, 589 - 628. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 1164", "Chevreux, E. (1900) Amphipodes provenant des campagnes de \" l'Hirondelle \" 1885 - 1888. Resultats des campagnes scientifiques du Prince Albert I de Monaco, 16, 1 - 195.", "Gurjanova, E. (1933) Zur Amphipoden fauna des Karischen Meeres. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 103 (5 - 6), 119 - 128.", "Gurjanova, E. (1934) Neue formen von Amphipoden des Karischen Meeres. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 108, 122 - 130.", "Gurjanova, E. (1938) Amphipoda, Gammaroidea zalikov Siaukhu i Sudzukhe (Yaponskoe More). [Amphipoda, Gammaroidea of Siaukhu Bay and Sudzukhe Bay (Japan Sea)]. Reports of the Japan Sea Hydrobiological Expedition of the Zoological Institute of the Academy of Sciences USSR in 1934, 1, 241 - 404,", "Gurjanova, E. (1946) New species of Isopoda and Amphipoda from the Arctic Ocean. Compendium of results, Drifting Expedition, Icebreaker \" Cedov \", 1937 - 1940, Moscow, 3, 272 - 297.", "Gurjanova, E. (1951) Bokoplavy morei SSSR i sopredelnykh vod (Amphipoda, Gammaridea). [Amphipods of the seas of USSR and adjacent waters (Amphipoda, Gammaridea)]. Opredeliteli po faune SSSR, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, 41, 1 - 1029.", "Barnard, J. L. (1962) Benthic marine Amphipoda of Southern California: Families Aoridae, Photidae, Ischyroceridae, Corophiidae, Podoceridae. Pacific Naturalist, 3 (1), 3 - 72.", "King, R. A. & Holmes, J. M. C. (2004) A new species of Ischyrocerus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from Ireland, with a review of Ischyrocerus anguipes and Ischyrocerus minutus from the North-East Atlantic. Journal of Natural History, 38 (14), 1757 - 1772. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 0022293031000156358", "Thurston, M. H. (1974 b) The Crustacea Amphipoda of Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. British Antarctic Survey Scientific Reports, 71, 1 - 133.", "Conlan, K. E. (1990) Revision of the crustacean amphipod genus Jassa Leach (Corophioidea: Ischyroceridae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 2031 - 2075. https: // doi. org / 10.1139 / z 90 - 288", "Walker, A. O. (1904) Report on the Amphipoda collected by Professor Herdman, at Ceylon, in 1902. In: Report to the Government of Ceylon on the Pearl Oyster Fisheries of the Gulf of Manaar, with supplementary reports upon the marine biology of Ceylon. Part II. The Royal Society, London, pp. 229 - 300.", "Chilton, C. (1921) Some New Zealand Amphipoda. 2. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 53, 220 - 234."]} |
|---|