Hemilamprops pterini Shalla & Bishop 2007

Hemilamprops pterini Shalla & Bishop, 2007 Hemilamprops pterini Shalla & Bishop, 2007: 1193–1196, figs 2, 3. Type material. Holotype: NMSZ 2000.249.1644, immature male. Paratypes: NMSZ 1999.238.0278, 1 preparatory female; NMSZ 1999.238.0279, 1 preparatory male; NMSZ 1999.217.01003, 1 pre-pre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gerken, Sarah
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3799321
https://zenodo.org/record/3799321
Description
Summary:Hemilamprops pterini Shalla & Bishop, 2007 Hemilamprops pterini Shalla & Bishop, 2007: 1193–1196, figs 2, 3. Type material. Holotype: NMSZ 2000.249.1644, immature male. Paratypes: NMSZ 1999.238.0278, 1 preparatory female; NMSZ 1999.238.0279, 1 preparatory male; NMSZ 1999.217.01003, 1 pre-preparatory female. Not seen. Diagnosis . Carapace with one lateral ridge, without setae, dorsal crest entire. Pleonites without dorsal crest. Telson 0.8 length of uropod peduncles, with 2–3 pairs lateral setae, 3 terminal setae. Uropod exopod article 1 1.1 length of article 2. Adult male unknown. Depth . 235–1095 m. Distribution . Boreal northeastern Atlantic, 60– 62°N, 0– 3°W. Remarks . Hemilamprops pterini is most similar to H. chilensis , but can be differentiated by the carapace lateral ridges. In H. pterini a lateral ridge sweeps from the pseudorostrum dorsally and connects with the branchial expansions, while in H. chilensis the lateral ridge is short and ventral to the pseudorostral suture, and does not come dorsal of the midline of the body. : Published as part of Gerken, Sarah, 2018, The Lampropidae (Crustacea: Cumacea) of the World, pp. 1-192 in Zootaxa 4428 (1) on page 80, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4428.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/3769771 : {"references": ["Shalla, S. H & Bishop, J. D. (2007) Lampropidae (Crustacea: Cumacea) from the deep North-East Atlantic and the North Sea, with two new species of Hemilamprops and Mesolamprops. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 87, 1191 - 1200. https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0025315407055063"]}