Heterophoxus Shoemaker 1925

Identification key to species of Heterophoxus of the world 1. Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner with an acute projection.................................................... 3 – Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner without projection..............................................................

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrade, Luiz F., Senna, André R.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2020
Subjects:
ren
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3629794
https://zenodo.org/record/3629794
Description
Summary:Identification key to species of Heterophoxus of the world 1. Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner with an acute projection.................................................... 3 – Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner without projection............................................................. 2 2. Uropod 1, rami subequal................................................................................ H. opus Griffiths, 1975 – Uropod 1, outer ramus much shorter than inner............................... H. cephalodens Griffiths, 1975 3. Epimeral plate 3, acute projection medium to long.......................................................................... 4 – Epimeral plate 3, acute projection short............................................. H. videns K.H. Barnard, 1930 4. Pereopod 7, basis reaching apex of merus........................................................................................ 5 – Pereopod 7, basis not reaching apex of merus.................................................................................. 7 5. Uropod 1, rami subequal................................................................................................................... 6 – Uropod 1, inner ramus about twice the length of outer.... H. pellusidus Ren in Ren & Huang, 1991 6. Uropod 2, peduncle longer than inner ramus........................ H. ophthalmicus (Schellenberg, 1925) – Uropod 2, peduncle shorter than inner ramus................................ H. ellisi Jarret & Bousfield, 1994 7. Antenna 2, article 4 without posteroproximal lobe.......................................................................... 8 – Antenna 2, article 4 with posteroproximal lobe.......................................... H. despard Alonso, 2012 8. Pereopod 4, coxa, posterodorsal margin with moderate to strong excavation................................. 9 – Pereopod 4, coxa, posterodorsal margin with weak excavation........ H. pennatus Shoemaker, 1925 9. Epimeral plates 1–3, posterior margin without setules................................................................... 10 – Epimeral plates 1–3, posterior margin covered with setules......................... H. shoemakeri sp. nov. 10. Pereopod 7, merus stout, posterodistal lobe produced................... H. trichosus K.H. Barnard, 1932 – Pereopod 7, merus slender, posterodistal lobe not produced................. H. oculatus (Holmes, 1908) : Published as part of Andrade, Luiz F. & Senna, André R., 2020, A novel species of Heterophoxus Shoemaker, 1925 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Phoxocephalidae) from southeast and southern Brazil, with an identification key to world species of the genus, pp. 1-16 in European Journal of Taxonomy 592 on page 14, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.592, http://zenodo.org/record/3626084 : {"references": ["Griffiths C. L. 1975. The Amphipoda of Southern Africa Part 5. The Gammaridea and Caprellidea of the Cape Province west of Cape Agulhas. Annals of the South African Museum 67 (5): 91 - 181.", "Barnard K. H. 1930. Crustacea. Part XI. Amphipoda. British Antarctic (\" Terra Nova \") Expedition, 1910. Natural History Report, Zoology 8 (4): 307 - 454. Available from https: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 49462829 [accessed 20 Dec. 2019].", "Ren X. & Huang L. 1991. Studies on Gammaridea and Caprellidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from the northwest waters off the Antarctic Peninsula. Studia Marina Sinica 32: 185 - 323.", "Jarret N. E. & Bousfield E. L. 1994. The amphipod superfamily Phoxocephaloidea on the pacific coast of North America. Family Phoxocephalidae. Part II. Subfamilies Pontharpiniinae, Paharpiniinae, Brolginae, Phoxocephalinae, and Harpiniinae. Systematics and distributional ecology. Amphipacifica 3 (4): 71 - 150.", "Alonso G. M. 2012. Amphipod crustaceans (Corophiidea and Gammaridea) associated with holdfasts of Macrocystis pyrifera from the Beagle Channel (Argentina) and additional records from the Southwestern Atlantic. Journal of Natural History 46 (29 - 30): 1799 - 1894. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222933.2012.692825"]}