FIGURE 9. a–f in Andeepia ingridae a new genus and species of Pardaliscidae (Crustacea, Amphipoda) from the Antarctic deep-sea and short redescription of Nicippe unidentata K. H. Barnard, 1932 ...
FIGURE 9. a–f. Main diagnostic differences between Nicippe unidentata (a, c, e) and Nicippe tumida (b, d, f, redrawn from Karaman, 1993). a, b) urosome, left aspect: development of dorsal process on urosomite 1 and position of distal process of uropod 2 peduncle; c, d) length of distal article of ma...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Still Image |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Zenodo
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.185184 https://zenodo.org/record/185184 |
Summary: | FIGURE 9. a–f. Main diagnostic differences between Nicippe unidentata (a, c, e) and Nicippe tumida (b, d, f, redrawn from Karaman, 1993). a, b) urosome, left aspect: development of dorsal process on urosomite 1 and position of distal process of uropod 2 peduncle; c, d) length of distal article of mandibular palp; e, f) distal margin of uropod 3 peduncle. ... : Published as part of Coleman, Tapati Biswas Charles Oliver & Hendrycks, Ed A., 2009, Andeepia ingridae a new genus and species of Pardaliscidae (Crustacea, Amphipoda) from the Antarctic deep-sea and short redescription of Nicippe unidentata K. H. Barnard, 1932, pp. 21-38 in Zootaxa 1977 on page 36, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.185176 ... |
---|