An Aerial-Hawking Bat Uses Stealth Echolocation to Counter Moth Hearing ...
(Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) Ears evolved in many nocturnal insects, including some moths, to detect bat echolocation calls and evade capture [1, 2]. Although there is evidence that some bats emit echolocation calls that are inconspicuous to eared moths, it is difficult to dete...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2010
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13467156 https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.13467156 |
| Summary: | (Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) Ears evolved in many nocturnal insects, including some moths, to detect bat echolocation calls and evade capture [1, 2]. Although there is evidence that some bats emit echolocation calls that are inconspicuous to eared moths, it is difficult to determine whether this was an adaptation to moth hearing or originally evolved for a different purpose [2, 3]. Aerial-hawking bats generally emit high-amplitude echolocation calls to maximize detection range [4, 5]. Here we present the first example of an echolocation counterstrategy to overcome prey hearing at the cost of reduced detection distance. We combined comparative bat flight-path tracking and moth neurophysiology with fecal DNA analysis to show that the barbastelle, Barbastella barbastellus, emits calls that are 10 to 100 times lower in amplitude than those of other aerialhawking bats, remains undetected by moths until close, and captures mainly eared moths. Model calculations demonstrate that only bats ... |
|---|