Exploring Tree Growth Variables Influencing Carbon Sequestration In The Face Of Climate Change

One of the major problems being faced by human society is that the global temperature is believed to be rising due to human activity that releases carbon IV Oxide (CO2) to the atmosphere. Carbon IV Oxide is the most important greenhouse gas influencing global warming and possible climate change. Wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. S. Eguakun, P. O. Adesoye
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1109139
https://zenodo.org/record/1109139
Description
Summary:One of the major problems being faced by human society is that the global temperature is believed to be rising due to human activity that releases carbon IV Oxide (CO2) to the atmosphere. Carbon IV Oxide is the most important greenhouse gas influencing global warming and possible climate change. With climate change becoming alarming, reducing CO2 in our atmosphere has become a primary goal of international efforts. Forest lands are major sink and could absorb large quantities of carbon if the trees are judiciously managed. The study aims at estimating the carbon sequestration capacity of Pinus caribaea (pine) and Tectona grandis (Teak) under the prevailing environmental conditions and exploring tree growth variables that influences the carbon sequestration capacity in Omo Forest Reserve, Ogun State, Nigeria. Improving forest management by manipulating growth characteristics that influences carbon sequestration could be an adaptive strategy of forestry to climate change. Random sampling was used to select Temporary Sample Plots (TSPs) in the study area from where complete enumeration of growth variables was carried out within the plots. The data collected were subjected to descriptive and correlational analyses. The results showed that average carbon stored by Pine and Teak are 994.4±188.3 Kg and 1350.7±180.6 Kg respectively. The difference in carbon stored in the species is significant enough to consider choice of species relevant in climate change adaptation strategy. Tree growth variables influence the capacity of the tree to sequester carbon. Height, diameter, volume, wood density and age are positively correlated to carbon sequestration. These tree growth variables could be manipulated by the forest manager as an adaptive strategy for climate change while plantations of high wood density species could be relevant for management strategy to increase carbon storage. : {"references": ["Akindele, S.O. and Abayomi, J.O. 1993. Stem diameter distribution in a\npermanent sample plot of Nauclea diderichi de wild in Southwestern\nNigeria. Proceedings of IUFRO conference held in Copenhagen. 14-17\nJune. Vanclay, J. K., Skovsgaard, J.P and Gertner, G.Z Eds. 188-193.", "Baker, T. R., Phillips, O. L., Malhi, Y., Almeida, S., Arroyo, L., Di\nFiore, A., Erwin, T., Killeen, T. J., Laurance, S. G., Laurance, W. F.,\nLewis, S. L., Lloyd, J., Monteagudo, A., Neill, D. A., Patino, S., Pitman,\nN. C. A., Silva, J. N. M. and Vasquez Martinez, R. 2004. Variation in\nwood density determines spatial patterns in Amazonian forest biomass.\nGlobal Change Biology 10:545\u2013562.", "Cloughesy M. 2006. Preface in forest, carbon and climate change: a\nsynthesis of science findings. Portland. 181. Available:\nhttp//www.oregonforests.org/assets/uploads//forcarbon-fulrpt.pdf\n(October 10, 2009)", "Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), 2010. Global Forest\nResource Assessment. 2010. Main report Retrieved 4 October, 2010\nfrom http://www/fao.org/forestry/fra/fra2010/en.", "Goers, L., Ashon, M.S, and Tyrell M.L. 2012. Managing Forest Carbon\nin a Changing Climate. Springer. 1-4", "Huston, M.A., Marland, G. (2003): Carbon management and\nbiodiversity. \u2013 J. of Environmental Management (Online). Available\nfrom: http://www.elsevier.com/ (2002, December, 22)", "Intergovermental Panal on Climate Change (IPCC), 2000. Land Use,\nLand-Use Change, and Forestry, Cambridge University Press, New\nYork. 1-20", "IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis.\nSummary for Policymakers, Paris. (Online). ttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/\nshared/bsp/hi/pdfs/02_02_07_climatereport.pdf (Accessed on February\n6, 2007)", "Korner C., Asshoff R., Bignucolo O., Hattenschwiler S., Keel S.G.,\nPelaez-Riedl S., Pepin S., Siegwolf R.T.W. and Zotz G. 2005. Carbon\nflux and growth in mature deciduous forest trees exposed to elevated\nCO2. Science. 309 (5739) 1360-1362\n[10] Marchetti, M. and Blasi, C. 2010. Old growth forest in Italy: towards a\nfirst network. Italian journal of forest and mountain Environment. 65\n(6), 679 \u2013 698.\n[11] Masera, O. R., J. F. Garza-Caligaris, M. Kanninen, T. Karjalainen, J.\nLiski, G. J. Nabuurs, A. Pussinen, B. H. J. d. Jong, and G. M. J.\nMohrenf. 2003. Modeling carbon sequestration in afforestation,\nagroforestry and forest management projects: the CO2FIX V.2 approach.\nEcological Modeling 164:177-199.\n[12] Percy, K.E., Jandl, R., Hall, J.P. and Lavigne M.2003.The Role of\nForests in Carbon Cycles, Sequestration, and Storage. Newsletter No.1\nhttp://iufro.boku.ac.at/iufro/taskforce/hptfcs.htm\n[13] Petit J. R., J. Jouzel, D. Raynaud, N. I. Barkov, J.-M. Barnola, I. Basile,\nM. Bender, J. Chappellaz, M. Davis, G. Delaygue, M. Delmotte, V. M.\nKotlyakov, M. Legrand, V. Y. Lipenkov, C. Lorius, L. P\u00c9pin, C. Ritz, E.\nSaltzman & M. Stievenard 1999. Climate and atmospheric history of the\npast 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core in Antarctica. Nature: 429-\n436.\n[14] Piovesan, G., Di Filippo, A., Alessandriri, A., Biondi, F., Schirone, B.,\nand White, P.S. 2010. Structure, dynamics and dendroecology of an old\ngrowth Fagus forest in Apennines. Journal of vegetation forest. 16 (1)\n13-28.\n[15] Stegen James C., Nathan G. Swenson, Renato Valencia, Brian J. Enquist\nand Jill Thompson. 2009. Above-ground forest biomass is not\nconsistently related to wood density in tropical forests. Global Ecology\nand Biogeography.1-8\n[16] Swenson, N.G. and Enquist, B.J. 2007. Ecological and evolutionary\ndeterminants of a key plant functional trait: wood density and its\ncommunity-wide variation across latitude and elevation. American\nJournal of Botany, 94, 451\u2013459.\n[17] Tagupa1, C., A. Lopez, A., Caperida, F., Pamunag, G. and Luzada A.\n2010.Carbon dioxide (co2) sequestration capacity of Tampilisan forest.\nE-International scientific research journal. ISSN: 2094-1749 volume: 2\nissue: 3, 2010\n[18] Terakunpisut, J. Gaajaseni, N. And Ruankawe N. (2007). Carbon\nsequestration potential in aboveground biomass of Thong Pha Phum\nNational Forest, Thailand. Applied Ecology and Environmental\nResearch. 5(2): 93 \u2013 102\n[19] Tschakert, P. 2001. Human dimensions of carbon sequestration: a\npolitical ecology approach to soil fertility management and\ndesertification control in the Old Peanut Basin of Senegal. Arid Lands\nNewsletter May\u2013June 2001.\n[20] Van kooten G.C., Eagle A.J., Manley J., Smo -lak T. 2004.How costly\nare carbon offsets? A meta \u2013 analysis of carbon forest sinks.\nEnvironmental Science & Policy.7, 239."]}