Environmental Capacity And Sustainability Of European Regional Airports: A Case Study

Airport capacity has always been perceived in the traditional sense as the number of aircraft operations during a specified time corresponding to a tolerable level of average delay and it mostly depends on the airside characteristics, on the fleet mix variability and on the ATM. The adoption of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gualandi, Nicola, Mantecchini, Luca, Serrau, Davide
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1058510
https://zenodo.org/record/1058510
Description
Summary:Airport capacity has always been perceived in the traditional sense as the number of aircraft operations during a specified time corresponding to a tolerable level of average delay and it mostly depends on the airside characteristics, on the fleet mix variability and on the ATM. The adoption of the Directive 2002/30/EC in the EU countries drives the stakeholders to conceive airport capacity in a different way though. Airport capacity in this sense is fundamentally driven by environmental criteria, and since acoustical externalities represent the most important factors, those are the ones that could pose a serious threat to the growth of airports and to aviation market itself in the short-medium term. The importance of the regional airports in the deregulated market grew fast during the last decade since they represent spokes for network carriers and a preferential destination for low-fares carriers. Not only regional airports have witnessed a fast and unexpected growth in traffic but also a fast growth in the complaints for the nuisance by the people living near those airports. In this paper the results of a study conducted in cooperation with the airport of Bologna G. Marconi are presented in order to investigate airport acoustical capacity as a defacto constraint of airport growth. : {"references": ["B. Graham and C. Guyer, \"Environmental sustainability, airport capacity\nand European air transport liberalization: irreconcilable goals,\" Journal\nof Transport Geography, vol. 7, pp. 165-180, 1999.", "R. Horonjeff, F.X. McKelvey, \"Planning and Design of Airports,\" Ed.\nMcGraw-Hill: New York, 1993.", "K. Hume, M. Gregg, C. Thomas and D. Terranova, \"Complaints Caused\nby Aircraft Operations: an Assessment of Annoyance by Noise Level an\nTime of the Day,\" Journal of Air Transport Management, vol. 9, pp.\n153-160, 2003.", "M. Ignaccolo, \"Environmental capacity: noise pollution at Catania-\nFontanarossa international airport,\" Journal of Air Transport\nManagement, vol. 6, pp. 191-199, 2000.", "The Manchester Metropolitan University, \"The Concept of Airport\nEnvironmental Capacity,\" Department of Environmental and\nGeographical Science, October 2002.", "H. M. E. Miedema and C. G. M. Oudshoorn, \"Annoyance from\ntransportation noise: relationship with exposure metrics DNL and DENL\nand confidence intervals\", Environmental Health Prospectives, vol. 109,\npp. 409-416, 2001.", "R. de Neufville and A. R. Odoni, \"Airport Systems: Planning, Design\nand Management,\" Ed. McGraw-Hill: New York, 2003.", "R. L. Paullin \"Capacity and Noise Relationships for Major Hub\nAirports,\" proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 58, pp. 307-313, March 1970.", "R. Rylander and M. Bj\u00f6rkman, \"Annoyance by aircraft noise around\nsmall airports\", Journal of Sound and Vibration, 205 (4), PP.533-537,\n1997.\n[10] M. J. T. Smith, \"Aircraft Noise\", Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge\nUniversity Press, 1989.\n[11] P. Upham, C. Thomas, D. Gillingwater and D. Raper, \"Environmental\nCapacity and Airport Operations: Current issues and Future Prospects,\"\nJournal of Air Transport Management, vol. 9, pp 145-151, 2003.\n[12] P. Upham, D. Raper, C. Thomas, M. McLellan, M. Lever, A. Lieuwen,\n\"Environmental Capacity and European Air Transport: Stakeholder\nOpinion and Implications for modeling,\" Journal of Air Transport\nManagement, vol. 10, pp 199-205, 2004."]}