Quantifying Landscape Connectivity: A Gis-Based Approach

Landscape connectivity combines a description of the physical structure of the landscape with special species- response to that structure, which forms the theoretical background of applying landscape connectivity principles in the practices of landscape planning and design. In this study, a resident...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Siqing S. Chen
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2010
Subjects:
GIS
Moe
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1056497
https://zenodo.org/record/1056497
Description
Summary:Landscape connectivity combines a description of the physical structure of the landscape with special species- response to that structure, which forms the theoretical background of applying landscape connectivity principles in the practices of landscape planning and design. In this study, a residential development project in the southern United States was used to explore the meaning of landscape connectivity and its application in town planning. The vast rural landscape in the southern United States is conspicuously characterized by the hedgerow trees or groves. The patchwork landscape of fields surrounded by high hedgerows is a traditional and familiar feature of the American countryside. Hedgerows are in effect linear strips of trees, groves, or woodlands, which are often critical habitats for wildlife and important for the visual quality of the landscape. Based on geographic information system (GIS) and statistical analysis (FRAGSTAT), this study attempts to quantify the landscape connectivity characterized by hedgerows in south Alabama where substantial areas of authentic hedgerow landscape are being urbanized due to the ever expanding real estate industry and high demand for new residential development. The results of this study shed lights on how to balance the needs of new urban development and biodiversity conservation by maintaining a higher level of landscape connectivity, thus will inform the design intervention. : {"references": ["Andr\u00e9n, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals\nin landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. -\nOikos 71:355-366.", "Taylor, P.D., Fahrig, L. Henein, K. and Merriam,G. 1993. Connectivity is\na vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68(3): 571-572.", "Chen, S. 2009. Integrating Hedgerow into Town Planning: A Framework\nfor Sustainable Residential Development. Proceedings of World\nAcademy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 41 May 2009.\npp. 134-143.", "Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M., 1985. Landscape Ecology. Wiley, New\nYork, 619 pp.", "McGarigal, K., SA Cushman, MC Neel, and E Ene. 2002. FRAGSTATS:\nSpatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. Computer\nsoftware program produced by the authors at the University of\nMassachusetts.", "Alexander, W. B. (1932). The bird population of an Oxfordshire farm.\nJournal of Animal Ecology 1, 58-64.", "Altieri, M. A. (1999). The ecological role of biodiversity in\nagroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 74, 19-31.", "Baltensperger, B. H. (1987). Hedgerow distribution and removal in\nnon-forested regions of the Midwest. Journal of Soil and Water\nConservation 42, 60-64.", "Barr, C. J., Bunce, R. G. H., Clark R. T., Fuller, R. M., Gillespie, M. K.,\nGroom, G. B., et al. (1993). Countryside Survey 1990, Main Report.\nLondon: Department of the Environment.\n[10] Battershill, M. R. J. and Gilg, A. W. (1997). Socio-economic constraints\nand environmentally friendly farming in the southwest of England.\nJournal of Rural Studies 13, 213-228.\n[11] Beedel, J. and Rehman, T. (2000). Using socialpsychology models to\nunderstand farmers- conservation behaviour. Journal of Rural Studies 16,\n117-127.\n[12] Gerry Barnes and Tom Williamson, 2006. Hedgerow history: ecology,\nhistory and landscape character /.\n[13] Birks, P.E. Kaland and D. Moe (Editors), The Cultural Landscape: Past,\nPresent and Future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 53-77.\n[14] Braekevelt, A. (1988). Evolution of the spatial structure of hedgerows in\nthe Hautland (NWBelgium). Connectivity in landscape ecology. In\nProceedings of 2nd International Seminar of IALE (S. K.F, ed.),\nM\u252c\u00bfunstersche Geographische Arbeiten 29, 153-161.\n[15] Buckley (Editors), Hedgerow Management and Nature Conservation.\nWye College Press, Wye, pp. 47-57.\n[16] Burel, F. (1996). Hedgerows and their role in agricultural landscapes.\nCritical Review in Plant Sciences 15, 169-190.\n[17] Burel, F. and Baudry, J., 1994. Control of biodiversity in hedgerow\nnetwork landscapes in western France. In: T.A. Wah, and G.P.\n[18] Burel, F., 1989. Landscape structure effects on carabid beetles- spatial\npatterns in Western France. Landscape Ecol., 2: 215-226.\n[19] Burel, F., 1992. Effect of landscape structure and dynamics on carabids-\nbiodiversity in Brittany, France. Landscape Ecol., 6: 161-194.\n[20] Burel, F., Baudry, J. and Lefeuvre, J.C., 1993. Landscape structure and\nwater fluxes. In: M.G. Pao1ettiandG.G. Lorenzoni (Editors), Landscape\nEcology and Agroecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.\n[21] Clergeau, P. and Burel, F. (1997). The role of spatio-temporal patch\nconnectivity at the landscape level: an example in a bird distribution.\nLandscape and Urban Planning 38, 37-43.\n[22] Cooper, A. and McCann. (1997). Northern Ireland Countryside Survey\n2000 Field Handbook. Coleraine: University of Ulster.\n[23] Cronon, William. 1983. Changes in the land, Indians, colonists and the\necology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang.\n[24] Corner, J. 2003. Landscape Urbanism, in Mostafavi, Mohsen and Najle,\nCiro (ed). Landscape urbanism: a manual for the machinic landscape.\nArchitectural Association, London, 2003.\n[25] Cox , Thomas, R. 1985. This well-wooded land : Americans and their\nforests fromcolonial times to the present.\n[26] Delattre, P., De Sousa, B., Fichet-Calvet, E., Qu'er'e, J. P. and Giraudoux,\nP. (1999). Vole outbreaks in a landscape context: evidence from a 6-year\nstudy of Microtus arvalis. Landscape Ecology 14, 401-412.\n[27] Dramstad et al. 1996, Landsacpe Ecology Principles and applications in\nLandscape Architecture. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University\nPress.\n[28] Dmowski, K. and Koziakiewicz, M. 1990. Influence of a shrub corridor\non movements of passerine birds to a lake littoral zone. Landscape\nEcology 4, 98-108.\n[29] Man, A., R. Law, and N. V. C. Polunin. 1995. Role of marine reserves in\nrecruitment to reef fisheries: a metapopulation model. Biological\nConservation 71: 197-204.\n[30] Forman, R. R. T. 1996. Land Masaic. Cambridge Univeristy Press.\n[31] Erickson, D. L., R. L. Ryan, and R. De Young. 2002. Woodlots in the\nrural landscape: Landowner motivations and management attitudes in a\nMichigan case study. Landscape and Urban Planning , 58: 101-112.\n[32] Fabos, J.G., 1991. From parks to greenways into the 21st century. In:\nProceedings from Selected Educational Sessions of the 1991 ASLA\nAnnual Meeting, Kansas City, MO.\n[33] Forman, R. T. T. and Baudry, J. (1984).Hedgerows and hedgerow\nnetworks in landscape ecology. Environmental Management 8, 499-510.\n[34] Lindhult, M., J. Fabos, P. Brown, and N. Prince, 1988. Using Geographic\nInformation Systems to Assess Conflicts Between Agriculture and\nDevelopment,\" Landscape and Urban Planning , December 1988, Vol. 16,\npp. 333-343.\n[35] Marc Antrop. Why landscapes of the past are important for the future.\nLandscape and Urban Planning 70 (2005) 21-34.\n[36] Marshall, E. J. P. and Arnold,G.M. (1995). Factors affecting field weed\nand field margins flora on a farm in Essex, UK. Landscape and Urban\nPlanning 31, 205-216.\n[37] Meeus, J., van der Ploeg, J.D. and Wijermans, M., 1988. Changing\nagricultural landscapes in Europe: continuity, deterioration or rupture?\nIFLA Conference, Rotterdam, 104 pp.\n[38] Merriam, G. and Lanoue, A., 1990. Corridor use by small mammals: field\nmeasurement for three experimental type of Peromyscus leucopus.\nLandscape Ecol., 4(2): 123-133.\n[39] Nabhan, G. P. and Sheridan, T. E. (1977). Living fencerows of the Rio\nSan Miguel, Sonora, Mexico: traditional technology for floodplain\nmanagement. Human Ecology 5, 97-111.\n[40] Nassauer, J. and Westmacott,R., 1987. Progressiveness among farmers as\na factor in heterogeneity of farmed landscapes. In: M.G. Turner (Editor),\nLandscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. Springer-Verlag. New York,\npp. 199-210.\n[41] Opdam, P., van Apeldoom, R., Schotman, A. and Kalkhoven J., 1993.\nPopulation responses to landscape fragmentation. In: C.C. Vos and P.\nOpdam (Editors), Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment. IALE\nStudies in Landscape Ecology 1. Chapman and Hall, London.\n[42] Oreszczyn, S. and Lane, B. (1999). How hedgerows and field margins are\nperceived by different interest groups. Aspects of Applied Biology 54,\n29-36.\n[43] Oreszczyn, S. and Lane, B. (2000). The meaning of the hedgerows in the\nEnglish landscape: different stakeholder perspectives and the implications\nfor future hedge management. J of Environ Management 60, 101-118.\n[44] Oreszczyn, S. M. and A. B. Lane (2001). Hedgerows of different cultures:\nimplications from a Canadian and English cross-cultural study. in C. Barr\nand S. Petit (eds.) Hedgerows of the World: their ecological functions in\ndifferent landscapes. Proceedings of the 2001 Annual IALE (UKL)\nConference, University of Birmingham. IALE, UK.\n[45] Paoletti, M.G. and Pimentel, D., 1992. Biotic Diversity in Agree\ncosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 356 pp.\n[46] Rippon, Stephen, 2004. Historic landscape analysis: deciphering the\ncountryside. Council for British Archaeology.\n[47] Rackham, O. and Moody, J. (1996). The Making of the Cretan Landscape.\nManchester: Manchester University Press.\n[48] Pollard, E., Hooper,M.D. and Moore, N. W. (1974). Hedges. London: W.\nCollins and Sons.\n[49] Dramstad, W.E., J.D. Olson, R.T.T. Forman, 1996. Landscape ecology\nprinciples in landscape architecture and land-use planning. Island Press.\n[50] Ryan, R. L. and J. T. Hansel Walker. 2004. Protecting and managing\nprivate farmland and public open spaces in the urban fringe: Lessons for\ngreenway implementation. Landscape and Urban Planning 68 (2-3):\n183-198.\n[51] Space based ornithology: on the wings of migration and biophysics, NASA,\n2005; Wetlands International, 2005; United Nations Environment Program,\n2006.\n[52] Saunders, D.A. and Hobbs, R.J. (Editors), 1991. The role of Corridors.\nSurrey Beatty, Chipping Norton. Australia, 442 pp.\n[53] Hansen, A. J., and D. L. Urban. 1992. Avian response to landscape\npattern: the role of species- life histories. Landscape Ecology 7: 163-180."]}