On the fraudulently awarded PhD. Issue 2: LTU case of deliberately violating all rules when awarding PhD for doctoral thesis mostly consisting of stolen and/or plagiarized results. ...
Abstract: Irrefutable facts and evidence of fraudulence while awarding PhD to Evgeniya Burtseva at Luleå University of Technology (LTU) in Sweden, are presented. Although it may be hard to believe, but what is presented here is the true case of research/academic fraudulence committed by a group of c...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference Object |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10428636 https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10428636 |
| Summary: | Abstract: Irrefutable facts and evidence of fraudulence while awarding PhD to Evgeniya Burtseva at Luleå University of Technology (LTU) in Sweden, are presented. Although it may be hard to believe, but what is presented here is the true case of research/academic fraudulence committed by a group of colluding accomplices. In particular, the presented case can be characterized by the following keywords/phrases: thefts and plagiarism in Burtseva’s PhD thesis, as well as forgery committed by E.Burtseva; the lying and thieving impostor-supervisor L.Maligranda; opponent-marionette L.Skrzypczak; dummy-co-supervisors S.Ericsson and I.Söderqvist; dummy-experts-evaluators T.Tossavainen, A.Holmbom and P.Jonsén; illegitimate member of the grading committee R.Pluciennik; concealment of the PhD thesis before the defence, during the defence and even up to 3 days after its fraudulent defence; keeping secret the link to the so-called public PhD defence procedure online; chairperson of the PhD defence act and the so-called ... |
|---|