Data from: Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? evidence from coastal Atlantic cod ...
The use of genetic markers under putative selection in population studies carries the potential for erroneous identification of populations and misassignment of individuals to population of origin. Selected markers are nevertheless attractive, especially in marine organisms that are characterized by...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Dataset |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dryad
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k718h66 https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.k718h66 |
| Summary: | The use of genetic markers under putative selection in population studies carries the potential for erroneous identification of populations and misassignment of individuals to population of origin. Selected markers are nevertheless attractive, especially in marine organisms that are characterized by weak population structure at neutral loci. Highly fecund species may tolerate the cost of strong selective mortality during early life stages, potentially leading to a shift in offspring genotypes away from the parental proportions. In Atlantic cod, recent genetic studies have uncovered different genotype clusters apparently representing phenotypically cryptic populations that coexist in coastal waters. Here, we tested if a highâgraded SNP panel specifically designed to classify individual cod to population of origin may be unreliable because of natural selection acting on the SNPs or their linked background. Temporal samples of cod were collected from two fjords, starting at the earliest life stage (pelagic ... : datapacketThe data packet is a gzip archive containing three data files (metadata.csv, 25snp_reference.gen, and 25snpNEW.gen) and one text file (datapacket.txt) describing contents of datafiles. ... |
|---|