Data from: Wolves adapt territory size, not pack size to local habitat quality ...
1. Although local variation in territorial predator density is often correlated with habitat quality, the causal mechanism underlying this frequently observed association is poorly understood and could stem from facultative adjustment in either group size or territory size. 2. To test between these...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dryad
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.b21q1 https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.b21q1 |
Summary: | 1. Although local variation in territorial predator density is often correlated with habitat quality, the causal mechanism underlying this frequently observed association is poorly understood and could stem from facultative adjustment in either group size or territory size. 2. To test between these alternative hypotheses, we used a novel statistical framework to construct a winter population-level utilization distribution for wolves (Canis lupus) in northern Ontario, which we then linked to a suite of environmental variables to determine factors influencing wolf space use. Next, we compared habitat quality metrics emerging from this analysis as well as an independent measure of prey abundance, with pack size and territory size to investigate which hypothesis was most supported by the data. 3. We show that wolf space use patterns were concentrated near deciduous, mixed deciduous/coniferous and disturbed forest stands favoured by moose (Alces alces), the predominant prey species in the diet of wolves in ... : Wolf pack size, 95% and 50% territory sizes and quality metricsTable describing wolf packs, territories and quality metrics used to evaluate whether wolves adjust pack size or territory size to match habitat qualityJAE_accepted_final_Table S1_supporting_05032015.xlsx ... |
---|