Data from: Residual eDNA detection sensitivity assessed by quantitative real-time PCR in a river ecosystem ...
Several studies have demonstrated that environmental DNA (eDNA) can be used to detect the presence of aquatic species, days to weeks after the target species has been removed. However, most studies used eDNA analysis in lentic systems (ponds or lakes), or in controlled laboratory experiments. While...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Dataset |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dryad
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5rf92 https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.5rf92 |
| Summary: | Several studies have demonstrated that environmental DNA (eDNA) can be used to detect the presence of aquatic species, days to weeks after the target species has been removed. However, most studies used eDNA analysis in lentic systems (ponds or lakes), or in controlled laboratory experiments. While eDNA degrades rapidly in all aquatic systems, it also undergoes dilution effects and physical destruction in flowing systems, complicating detection in rivers. However, some eDNA (i.e. residual eDNA) can be retained in aquatic systems, even those subject to high flow regimes. Our goal was to determine residual eDNA detection sensitivity using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), in a flowing, uncontrolled river after the eDNA source was removed from the system; we repeated the experiment over two years. Residual eDNA had the strongest signal strength at the original source site and was detectable there up to 11.5 hours after eDNA source removal. Residual eDNA signal strength decreased as ... : Appendix S1. Ct values for qRT-PCR efficiency for Salmo salar.Ct values for Figure 2. 10-fold Salmo salar dilution series with Salmo_Mito-951 (d-loop; Karlsson et al. 2012) primer set.Suppl Info - Appendix S1. Ct values for qRT-PCR efficiency.xlsxAppendix S2. Little River 2014 qRT-PCR Ct values.Ct values for Figure 3A. Little River 2014 river samples. Primer set Salmo_Mito-951 (Karlsson et al. 2012).Suppl Info - Appendix S2. Little River 2014 qRT-PCR Ct values.xlsxAppendix S3. Little River 2015 qRT-PCR Ct values.Ct values for Figure 3B. Little River 2015 samples. Primer set Salmo_Mito-951 (Karlsson et al. 2012).Suppl Info - Appendix S3. Little River 2015 qRT-PCR Ct values.xlsx ... |
|---|