Data from: Effects of food abundance and early clutch predation on reproductive timing in a high Arctic shorebird exposed to advancements in arthropod abundance ...

• Main Authors: Reneerkens, Jeroen, Schmidt, Niels Martin, Gilg, Olivier, Hansen, Jannik, Hansen, Lars Holst, Moreau, Jérôme, Piersma, Theunis
• Format: Dataset
• Language: English
• Published: Dryad 2017
• Subjects: Calidris alba; Aranea; Vulpes lagopus; timing; Sanderling; nest survival; chick growth; mismatch; trophic mismatch; clutch predation; bird migration; Holocene; Hemiptera; Diptera; Arctic; Greenland; Climate change; Zackenberg
• Online Access: https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3dk6r; https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.3dk6r

Climate change may influence the phenology of organisms unequally across trophic levels and thus lead to phenological mismatches between predators and prey. In cases where prey availability peaks before reproducing predators reach maximal prey demand, any negative fitness consequences would selectively favor resynchronization by earlier starts of the reproductive activities of the predators. At a study site in northeast Greenland, over a period of 17 years, the median emergence of the invertebrate prey of Sanderling Calidris alba advanced with 1.27 days per year. Yet, over the same period Sanderling did not advance hatching date. Thus, Sanderlings increasingly hatched after their prey was maximally abundant. Surprisingly, the phenological mismatches did not affect chick growth, but the interaction of the annual width and height of the peak in food abundance did. Chicks grew especially better in years when the food peak was broad. Sanderling clutches were most likely to be depredated early in the season, ... : Reneerkens et al 2016 Ecol&Evol -Clutch survivalTable of histories of Sanderling (Calidris alba) clutches in Zackenberg, northeast Greenland, 2007-2013. Columns contain data about (1) “Date found”, the day of the breeding season on which the nest was found; (2) “Date last checked when alive”, the last day the clutch was checked when alive; (3) “Date last checked”, the last day the clutch was checked; (4) “Fate”, the fate of the nest (0 = successfully hatched, 1 = depredated) and (5) “Hatch date”, the date of hatch, which was observed in case the clutch was successful, or estimated based on egg flotation, in case the clutch was not successful. Dates are scaled such that 10 June is day 1, the earliest date at which a clutch was found. Further information is found in the methods section of the publication.Reneerkens et al 2016 Ecol&Evol - Arthropod abundanceTable of arthropod abundance in Zackenberg in the years 1996-2013 (excluding 2010). Columns contain data about Year, Date (day of year), and the ...