Supplemental Material for Smith et al., 2020
Document S1: Detailed description of library preparation, RNA bait design, and targeted sequence capture methods. Document S2: Map information, phenotypes, and genotypes used for QTL and sex locus mapping. Table S1: The lake trout linkage map and sequences of mapped RAD loci. Table S2: Centromere ma...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
GSA Journals
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.25387/g3.11908326.v1 https://gsajournals.figshare.com/articles/Supplemental_Material_for_Smith_et_al_2020/11908326/1 |
Summary: | Document S1: Detailed description of library preparation, RNA bait design, and targeted sequence capture methods. Document S2: Map information, phenotypes, and genotypes used for QTL and sex locus mapping. Table S1: The lake trout linkage map and sequences of mapped RAD loci. Table S2: Centromere mapping intervals for each linkage group Table S3: Candidate genes identified for significant QTL peaks. Table S4: Estimated recombination rates for each linkage group Figure S1: Alignments of lake trout linkage groups with Arctic char chromosomes. Figure S2: Alignments of lake trout linkage groups with rainbow trout chromosomes. Figure S3: Alignments of lake trout linkage groups with Atlantic salmon chromosomes. Figure S4: Dot plot grid comparing the lake trout linkage map with the Arctic char genome assembly. Figure S5: Dot plot grid comparing the lake trout linkage map with the rainbow trout genome assembly. Figure S6: Dot plot grid comparing the lake trout linkage map with the Atlantic salmon genome assembly. Figure S7: MapComp dot plot grid comparing the lake trout linkage map with the brook trout linkage map from Sutherland et al. (2016). Figure S8: Centromere mapping using half tetrad analysis. Figure S9: Boxplots of recombination rate estimated for each linkage group for males and females. |
---|